There is a wild and crazy judicial race in Snohomish County. Five (count 'em, 5) candidates are in a free for all for one vacant seat. No primary, no run off. At a recent forum all the candidates forgot about us, the public, in a forum in Stanwood.
The candidates argued about issues that nobody cared about. The forum was punctuated with snickers after all the candidates attacked Tessandore for stating that Snohomish County voters trust lawyers and judges, and that voters should vote for him based on a poll of Snohomish County lawyers. Even Wilson, Peterson, and Hulbert could be seen chuckling when Tessandore claimed lawyers were trusted. Hulber noted that the Bar Association poll was a "sham." Wilson asserted that the poll was tainted by Tessandore being president of the bar association and through some type of voter misconduct by the Prosecutor's Office.
The other issue that created heat was Tessandore's assertion that David Hulbert was "affidavited more than any Snohomish County Judge." Nobody every explained what "affidavited" means. As the audience chuckled in disbelief, all the candidates argued among themselves. Hulbert got the final word when he stated that none of the candidates had ever "affidavited" him. If being affidavited is bad, why hadn't those attorneys affidavited Hulbert? Peterson was the only candidate to directly respond, stating that he had never affidavited a judge.
Analysis:
David Hulbert: Who really cares if David Hulbert previously was a judge and was voted of office in 2004, or that he failed to win a race against Judge Lucas in 2008. What is a concern is his failure to address issues related to an arrest for drunk driving, and his biggest regret being that his license was suspended for one year for failing to take a breathalyzer. Hulbert appears to be the favorite of conservatives, but there are moderates (Scott Peterson and possibly Scott Lord) that should please both Democrats and Republicans.
Scott Lord: Scott Lord appears to be far to the left, along with Joe Wilson and Rico Tessandore. But a close review of his record reveals some Republican leanings. Its hard to tell, but Scott Lord may be slightly to the right of Tessandore and Wilson, but is solidly in the left wing. Still, Scott Lord may pull a large number of left wing voters, and a good portion of the moderate voters, but not enough to win the election. Tessandore has called Scott Lord his friend, and Scott Lord appears to have ceased to actively campaign. He may have withdrawn from the race.
Scott Peterson: Scott Peterson is virtually unknown locally. He has prevailed in 9 out of 10 appeals in Snohomish County this year, prior to filing for judge. This is the best record of any civil attorney in Snohomish County, and of the other candidates. Peterson claims to have represented hundreds of parties in civil suits, and internet reviews of court records in dicate this is true. Scott Peterson is the only lawyer to acknowledge suing other lawyers. Good asset in our opinion. Scott Peterson's strong point is that he appears to be the only moderate in the race. Tessandore, Wilson, and Lord all appear to be far more liberal than most Snohomish County Democrats. David Hulbert appears to be far too conservative for everybody in Snohomish County, and is probably unelectable due to his reputation on the bench, and misgivings by Republicans about voting for him. Petersons excellent appellate record, and willingness to sue lawyers, makes him the best choice for moderates and conservatives, and everybody except for the few hundred far left wing democrats.
Rico Tessandore: Tessandore is dogged by his lack of candor about his employer. It takes much detective work to learn that the "small business" he claims to work for is one of the largest insurance companies in the United States: Farmers Insurance. Only the Everett Herald has reported this, it certainly is not disclosed in any of Tessandore's materials. The Everett Herald endorsed Joe Wilson, so it should be no surprise that the Herald assisted in "outing" Tessandore. Tessandore lacks the experience of all the other candidates, only ten years as a lawyer. What Tessandore lacks in experience and charisma he attempts to make up in fundraising. Tessandore has outspent all the other candidates combined. Tessandore has many endorsements, but most ring hollow and appear to be political paybacks for supporting Judge Appel against Joe Wilson in 2008. Tessandore also has a skeleton in the closet related to alleged attacks on police officers when he was in the prosecutor's office. Tessandore has not adequately explained his departure from the prosecutor's office. Tessandore was recently served with a cease and desist order by the Elections Office. This order appears to be a dirty trick perpetrated by the Snohomish County Young Democrats. The Young Democrats have openly supported and campaigned for Joe Wilson.
Joe Wilson: Wilson is having a tough time fending off allegations related to numerous DUI arrests and alcohol related negligent driving tickets. Wilson has been sober for many years according to campaign aides, but the issue continues to dog him at every forum. Wilson has a background in civil law, family law, criminal law, and two appeals cases. Wilson has the backing of Democratic leaders, but he appears to be to the left of even the Democratic leaders. Wilson promotes a family tradition of civil service (his father was a judge). Its unsure if voters will accept Wilson's assertion that he acquired his fathers judicial skills through osmosis.
Insiders report fighting between Tessandore and Wilson over the far left wing of the Democratic party leadership. This fighting may damage both candidates. It appears that this fighting will allow Peterson to win the election by taking the some liberal, most moderate and the bulk of conservative votes. This of course depends on the right wingers acknowledging that its better to elect a moderate that is acceptable to the Democrats (Peterson), that to vote for the un-electable conservative (Hulbert).
Early reports from the County Elections Office indicate that this judicial race is leading to a much higher than expected return rate on ballots. That office expects to set records for an election the year after a Presidential election. This is traced solely to this hotly contested judicial election.
If anybody has more inside information, please comment. This race is not getting a lot of publicity. It appears to be more of a campaign of signs. There is not a piece of real estate in Snohomish County that doesn't have a judge campaign sign.
Posted by 6p0120a627718c970b at October 27, 2009 09:04 PM | Email This2. Judge Lucas may, or may not, be loony. That issue was decided by the voters in the past 2 races between Lucas and Hulbert. Twice the voters rejected Hulbert.
3. "On the job training" is the canned spiel by Hulbert. Hulbert never mentioned that when he was initially appointed! All the candidates will need training before they are fully functioning judges. Anybody who tells you otherwise is as loony as the prior poster claims Judge Lucas is.
4. The prior poster is putting Hulbert's spin on a situation that confronts Republicans. Should they continue to support a far right wing Republican that has shown in the past two elections that he is not electable? Hulbert's support by Republicans is limited to the far right, not the moderate Republicans.
5. Look at the various candidate websites. Hulberts site provides very limited information for good reason.
Posted by: Ron Wilson on October 28, 2009 10:50 AMI hope the voters read the voters pamphlet and don't let this become an election about signs and money. The battle of the signs and money appears to be between Rico Tessandore and Joe Wilson. That battle is becoming a battle of the idiots, Joe Wilson and Rico Tessandore. The candidates are placing signs 2 inches in front of another candidates signs. It sure appears that there is bad blood between Tessandore and Wilson.
It would be interesting to find out if this is a campaign manager dirty trick or if its directed by the candidates themselves. I hope the voters hold this conduct against the candidates when they vote. If the candidate cannot control their campaign staff, how will they control a courtroom.
While Scott Lord appears to be out of the race, is anybody sure?
Posted by: Bob Rass on October 28, 2009 06:17 PMcan any lawyers tell us why Tessandore left the prosecutors office? i asked a joe wilson supporter and all he would do was smile when i asked what tessandore was hiding.
what is going on?
Posted by: B. Clark on October 31, 2009 06:33 AM(1# Judges or candidates for election to judicial office shall not:
#b# make speeches for a political organization or nonjudicial candidate
or publicly endorse a nonjudicial candidate for public office.
Joe Wilson has his name on campaign material as endorsing two candidates #non judicial)currently running for public office.
Posted by: anonymous on November 1, 2009 03:50 AMbut i am interested in knowing about the integrity of the candidates. do you have candidate names and website to prove that joe wilson is endorsing non-judicial candidates? do you have brochures? if i get the proof, i won't vote for joe. i'll change my ballot. i certainly won't vote for rico tessandore.
so, where is the proof or is this disinterested "anonymous" really a rico tessandore supporter hiding in the cloak of anonymity.
you can change your ballot. just cross of the name of the candidate you no longer want to vote for, and fill in the arrow for the candidate you do want to vote for. i m waiting for the proof. show me the proof, i'll change my ballot.
Posted by: Mukilteo voter on November 1, 2009 04:27 AMbut i am interested in knowing about the integrity of the candidates. do you have candidate names and website to prove that joe wilson is endorsing non-judicial candidates? do you have brochures? if i get the proof, i won't vote for joe. i'll change my ballot. i certainly won't vote for rico tessandore.
so, where is the proof or is this disinterested "anonymous" really a rico tessandore supporter hiding in the cloak of anonymity.
you can change your ballot. just cross of the name of the candidate you no longer want to vote for, and fill in the arrow for the candidate you do want to vote for. i m waiting for the proof. show me the proof, i'll change my ballot.
Posted by: Mukilteo voter on November 1, 2009 04:27 AMOh, and I didn't paraphrase...I cut and pasted directly from the Canon.
Posted by: Dan Johnson on November 1, 2009 11:53 AMOne comment on the forum in Stanwood - whoever posted their comments was not there - Why? because Scott Lord was not there. Where are you getting your facts?????
Left Leaning???? Really - based on what - give me a call sometime and we can sit down and you can figure out who I am rather than base your decision on antidotes, misinformation, lies and scare tactics.
Posted by: Joe Wilson on November 2, 2009 09:33 AMThe current Federal Way judge also has integrity problems and is under investigation.
Maybe we should elect Rico Tessandore for judge in federal way, with all Federal Ways problems he'd fit in perfectly.
Posted by: anonymous on November 2, 2009 12:09 PMFACT: Joe Wilson was also listed on websites in 2008 as endorsing candidates while unsuccessfully running against George Appel for Snohomish County Superior Court.
FACT: In 2008 and 2009 Joe Wilson contributed to nonjudicial candidates campaigns.
Everybody knows if you contribute to a campaign your name is going to be listed as a supporter.
Posted by: anonymous on November 2, 2009 04:01 PMI can't comment on the websites in 2008. Where did you get your information? And if it is true, was it ever brought to Mr. Wilson's attention?
As far as the 2008 and 2009 nonjudicial contributions, after looking further on the PDC, I can only find contributions during periods of time when Mr. Wilson WAS NOT running for office (i.e. April '09 and February '08). As far as I know, he is only forbidden to make contribution DURING a judicial race or WHILE IN JUDICIAL OFFICE. I don't see that he has violated that, either.
Posted by: Wilson Supporter on November 2, 2009 06:10 PMLook at how much money some of these guys have spent on their campaign and how much the job pays. We have big time politics in Snohomish county. LOL
I'm voting for the guy who seems to really want to be a good Judge and hasn't been convicted of any crime.
Posted by: Belinda J. on November 2, 2009 09:37 PMNow, who is that candidate?
Posted by: different anonymous on November 3, 2009 10:07 AM