This one has to be heard to be believed. A Ron Paul campaign worker was carrying about $4,700 in donations in a metal box onto an airplane. The TSA security guys asked him why he had all that money. The RP guy asked if he was required to answer the question.
This seems perfectly reasonable to me. The police may be entitled to ask my name and address, they can ask for my ticket and learn where I am going and from whence I came, but who I work for and why I have money is my own business.
This guy had an mp3 player or smartphone with him, and he turned on the voice recorder. You can hear the audio here:
http://video1.washingtontimes.com/video/tsabierfeldt.mp3
This was chilling. "Answer our questions or we will take you to the police station." "We won't tell you if you are required to answer." "If you don't have anything to hide you should answer." Hello, civil liberties violation.
It is my understanding that if the cops pull you over and start asking personal questions, that you don't have to answer. Simply exercising your constitutional rights does not provide probable cause to detain you in and of itself. How much power does TSA actually have?
It's pretty clear these guys were arrogant, poorly trained, and not very bright. Of course having union member government employees was supposed to protect us from this kind of nonsense. Right.
OK, so you legal eagles out there - are we required to give TSA answers to personal questions? Can we be legally detained or arrested for simply carrying around 5 grand and then refusing to provide answers about it? Can they legally prevent us from getting on a plane if we don't answer personal questions?
Hairy
Oh yeah, and cudos to the Ron Paul supporter for sticking up for his rights. I have had some harsh things to say about RP and is supporters for some of their out there positions, but this guy was absolutely right on. It took a lot of guts and patience to do this.
That TSA cop sure feels important rifling through the guys underwear and smelling the guys socks.
Posted by: swatter on April 7, 2009 07:58 AMJust a thought, this took place in the St. Louis airport. I wonder if Missouri allows the recording of a conversation with permission from only one party. The TSA was unaware they were being recorded. It would be interesting to see what would happen if TSA were to try to prosecute this guy for breaking "wiretap" laws. Or try to shut him up with a threat of prosecution.
But damn,that TSA guy didn't recognize ANY limits to his authority. He clearly felt entitled to ask anything he wanted, and had been taught to "control" the situation by not answering questions from the perp/suspect. What a bully.
Hairy
Posted by: Hairy Buddah on April 7, 2009 09:35 AM