January 14, 2009
Does your income double every 10 years?

Washington State Government spending is out of control. But that is nothing new for a government that's been dominated by Democrats for decades. I decided I wanted to understand just how quickly Democrats are exploding this government, and while you'd think that this data would be easily found on the web, it wasn't.

So for your consideration is the growth, or bloat, of this state's spending habits back to 1983. In advance I'll tell you it works out to an average biennial increase of 14.3%, or roughly 7.2% growth every year. That means a doubling of government spending every 10 years. In Washington, the 2008 budget was 5.3 times the size of the budget in 1983, compared to the Federal Government's growth to just under 3.5 times its size in 1983.

Consider this. Washington's 7.2% average annual spending growth rate is 41% higher than the 5.1% average annual growth rate of Federal spending over the same period. Don't you find that as ridiculous as I do?

The numbers below reflect total Washington State Spending. That includes operating and capital funds both within the General Fund (unrestricted) and restricted funds the Legislature can't touch.

Biennium Spending Increase
(Billions)
1983-1985  $12.96
1985-1987 15.02 15.90%
1987-1989 17.18 14.38%
1989-1991 21.41 24.62%
1991-1993 23.99 12.05%
1993-1995 29.55 23.18%
1995-1997 34.10 15.40%
1997-1999 39.40 15.54%
1999-2001 44.54 13.05%
2001-2003 49.53 11.20%
2003-2005 53.46 7.93%
2005-2007 60.52 13.21%
2007-2009 69.18 14.31%

Now if spending is doubling every 10 years, what do you think your taxes are doing every 10 years? Is your income keeping pace? Mine isn't.

Posted by mjc3389 at January 14, 2009 08:48 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Good post--why don't we ever see these numbers in the PI and Times? They repeated the $40 million cost of Ken Starr's investigations of Clinton so many times that I still remember the number 10 years later. But they would never give us these basic budget numbers.

Another question to ask: has your consumption of gov't services doubled?

Posted by: russell garrard on January 14, 2009 11:16 AM
2. When one discusses the issue of media bias, here is another excellent example. Specifically, do you think the media accidentally neglects to inform Americans of facts and trends like this, or could it be part of the Pravda media's efforts to keep Americans in the dark about the left's pursuit of government growth and taxes?

Posted by: Reality on January 14, 2009 11:59 AM
3. I'd like to see a comparison of the change in the number of State employees over the same period.

But, to be fair, what has been the growth of the State population over this same time period?

Posted by: SN on January 15, 2009 09:31 AM
4. I'd like to see a comparison of the change in the number of State employees over the same period.

But, to be fair, what has been the growth of the State population over this same time period?

Posted by: SN on January 15, 2009 09:31 AM
5. I did a quick calculation to adjust for inflation and population growth. If you take the 1983 figure of $12.96 billion and adjust for population growth and inflation, it comes to $42.9 billion. In other words if spending per capita had been held constant over the years, the current biennial budget would be at $42.9 billion, but in fact it is at $69 billion if the OP's figure is right.

So, since 1983, state spending has grown by about 61 percent, adjusted for inflation and population.

Posted by: russell garrard on January 15, 2009 01:41 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?