For the past week or so, I have been pondering if Obama even wanted a filibuster-proof Senate? Why else would he have ignored the Chambliss-Martin runoff in Georgia?
First, to get reelected, Obama will need to govern from the center or center-left of the mainstream American. With a filitbuster-proof Senate, the likes of Reid, Pelsoi and Company will be able to push a liberal and left of left agenda without Obama.
Without the filibuster-proof Senate, they have to work with Obama.
If Obama really wanted to govern from the far left, the filibuster-proof Senate would be just the ticket. And yet, other than his now unemployed fund-raisers, he never helped Martin out.
Off-topic: Chambliss credits Palin for his victory.
Posted by tedtrepanier at December 03, 2008 08:40 AM | Email ThisAs for the filibuster proof Senate, don't think that the 42 or 41 the Republicans will have is strong. It's not going to be hard to sway Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe. Democrats will get almost everything they want through the Congress.
Posted by: Palouse on December 3, 2008 02:42 PMHillary as SOS cries out for explanation too. She's a longtime lawyer whose previous claim to fame was health care, and all the sudden she's a FP expert? She has no military background. As far as I can find out she doesn't even speak any foreign languages.
Posted by: russell garrard on December 4, 2008 01:46 AM