September 06, 2008
A Conservative Case for Supporting the Bellevue Teacher Strike

"The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly. 'Tis dearness only that gives everything its value."--Thomas Paine

Let's establish first that Bellevue is an excellent school district. Education writer Jay Mathews has long put out a list of America's Best High Schools, and in the recent 2008 ranking there are 4 Bellevue high schools in the top 100, including The International School at #10; Sammamish makes the top 200, at #168. Consider, too, the long tradition of excellence that the Bellevue high schools have; by clicking on the plus sign next to the name of the school, you can see how it's rankings have fluctuated over the years. For a different look at the 2007 rankings, click here.

That's one metric; let's go to our state tests for another. Playing around with the school comparison tool at OSPI's website pretty capably demonstrates the good work that Bellevue's high schools are doing; stack Bellevue HS up against others from surrounding districts and see what you find. The "big picture" argument can be found by digging through the 2008 data files, also from the OSPI website. Download "WASL Scores by District", sort by whatever metric means the most to you (I chose reading), and see what you find--no matter how you slice it, the Bellevue SD will come out looking pretty good.


"That government is best which governs least."--Thomas Paine again

So, what's the problem?

Fair question. Let's ask the school district.

This 2007 article on the topic of scripted curriculum in Bellevue is a must-read to understand where the district and the teachers are both coming from, and it directly relates to the issue that I think is going to be the hardest one for the two sides to solve before this strike is over.

From the district perspective, they have an abiding interest in making sure that every child in the district receives the same quality of education. This is as it should be; the line about "the soft bigotry of low expectations" might be the best that President Bush came up with in 8 years, and it speaks to the point that no matter their background, a child at one school should get just as much quality teaching as a child at another school.

A difference, though, is in perspective. The Bellevue School District vision of every child receiving the same lesson from the same script ensures that they'll all receive the same lesson, but it's patently ridiculous to think that the input is the only variable that matters. The underlying assumption in a controlling curriculum like the one that Bellevue has put together is that every child is at the same place at the same time, no matter the events of the day or the make-up of the school or the differences in the children.

It echoes, eerily, the worst aspects of the Napoleonic system of education that was instituted in the 1800s under the Little General. No local control, no classroom differences, no teacher creativity. Consider these stories that the Bellevue Education Association recently put out on their website.


It's important to let our military commanders, who are in the best position, to manage the war on terrorism and to carry out the war on terrorism. They're the ones who are in the best position to call the shots.--Scott McClellan

So the decisions on what to do in the classroom are being made by those the very farthest away from the classroom, in central administration. The teachable moment is lost, the current event must be ignored, because the all-controlling curriculum mandates that it be so.

Here you can throw in all your "Yah, buts..."

"Yah, but the teachers suck!" Some do. Some are quite excellent. Under a system like this excellence is sacrificed for the mean, and that's not right.

"Yah, but striking is no way to protest!" Quite possibly. If the system as designed isn't good for the students, though, what other recourse is there?

"Yah, but the district has been willing to bend on the issue!" How far? The article cited above was from June of last year, 15 months and innumerable bargaining sessions ago, and yet the issue is still hanging out there. Apparently both sides think that the on-line curriculum is worth fighting over.


In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing. The worst thing you can do is nothing.--Teddy Roosevelt

It's a tough call for the teachers. It's a tough call for the district. What it's not, though, is a black/white liberal/conservative union/free market dichotomy. There's room all through the political spectrum to look and say, "You know, the teachers have a point."

Posted by TeacherRyan at September 06, 2008 03:24 PM | Email This
Comments
1. The answer to this is simple: vouchers.

Giving parents the ultimate control over which school their kid goes to will force all members of the educational institution to focus on giving the kids the best classroom experience.

(Illegal) strikes like this will drive kids away and make it a self defeating way of dealing with policy disputes.

(BTW, quoting "great" people of history does not make your argument any better.)

Posted by: blindman on September 6, 2008 09:50 PM
2. Sorry, the teachers have NO point, and their union leaders should be put in prison; while the teachers themselves should be locked up UNTIL THEY AGREE TO GET BACK IN THEIR AND FRICKING TEACH.

My PARROT is more "conservative" then anyone who agrees that breaking the law and holding children hostage to outrageous wage demands for a part time job is in any way justified.

Posted by: Hinton on September 7, 2008 01:50 PM
3. THEIR = THERE

Posted by: hinton on September 7, 2008 01:54 PM
4. THEIR = THERE

Posted by: hinton on September 7, 2008 01:58 PM
5. If the teachers want to strike, let them do it in July, and let them actually LOSE their pay for time off, not just delay their guaranteed loot.

It is illegal for teachers to strike. The first thing these folks need to teach our kids is respect for the law.

Throw them all in jail.

Posted by: Seabecker on September 9, 2008 04:17 PM
6. The only thing that makes these strikes possible is the good will that teachers have with the public. Most people put teachers on a mighty high pedestal. Maybe it's well deserved, maybe not. But it exists. And when they trot out dozens of kindergartners with cutesy homemade signs saying "support our teachers" and such it's just an emotional political game. Awww, who wouldn't support the teachers!? It's for the children--the children!!

Well, in cases like this, the management toward whom the strike is directed against is the school board, elected by voters. The teachers may have legitimate gripes with the policies coming down from above. They should use their good will with the public to work to elect board members who share their views. Let the voters decide. That's the legitimate way to work out these differences.

Posted by: AD on September 10, 2008 03:11 AM
7. I don't think teachers should strike, either, especially since their union got them to this place to begin with. If school districts could fire substandard teachers and reward excellent teachers with higher pay, maybe the districts wouldn't consider implementation of programs such as scripted teaching.

On the other hand, scripted teaching has to be one of the worst ideas I've ever heard of. It seems to me that this would improve the classroom performance of only the poorest teachers, not to mention that it's insulting and demeaning to competent teachers.

Posted by: Paula on September 12, 2008 06:22 AM
8. There is no conservative case for a teachers' strike in Washington state. To strike is illegal. The WEA keeps saying that an appeals court has never ruled against the strikers. Half truth. The WEA has lost every time in the trial court and NEVER has appealed. Get it? No loss in appeals court because they never went there.

Posted by: Ron on September 12, 2008 09:53 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?