The early reporting on the Paroline slaying has really bothered me.

The Lib mainstream papers have bent over backwards to try and portray Paroline, the 60 year old victim, as having harassed the girls. The papers all put the lies of the girls at the front of their articles "reporting" that he hit them, that he sprayed them...but now there is video evidence that he simply stayed stoic while they yelled, screamed and hurled objects at the guy!

The official court documents shows that the girls lied from beginning to end. They said they didn't know the perp, but later admitted they did. Therefore, the local reporters should not reprint any "testimony" of these liars. I mean, do they reprint every drunk bum's words who overhears something from an alley?

And another thing: they kept saying these girls were 12. But they were in a car. Who was driving? A 12 year old? Who was the responsible adult who was there in the car already and what is his or her name? And will that person be accused of assault?