I was surfing around and came upon Vanguard News Network with its: "No Jews. Just Right" slogan and got to these inflamatory ideas from the American nazi/white supremist.

David Duke gives campaign advice to Ron Paul. FOR MORE DAVID DUKE GO TO:

http://www.davidduke.com/general/3339_3339.html#more-3339

"I like Ron Paul's campaign, and I think it is good for America and the political process. Why do I think so? It is because people such as Ron Paul shake up the system, and Paul takes a lot of correct positions such as opposition to the Iraq War, opposition to foreign aid to Israel and the rest of the world, as well as having unrelenting support for the civil liberties of the American people. Second, what I will say here cannot hurt the campaign in the liberal media because I will now offer some criticisms showing that I think that Ron Paul does not do enough to defend the heritage and interests of European Americans.

In my opinion, Ron Paul has the right position on the Iraq War, foreign interventionism and foreign aid, monetary policy and American rights and freedoms, but Paul has not been vocal enough on the issues that matter most to the American people, such as immigration, affirmative action, the effects of welfare and medical care for working Americans. And Ron Paul has had a dead wrong opinion on foreign trade in supporting a libertarian policy that basically favors open trade rather than one that would protect American industry and labor. These are issues important to the overwhelming European American majority of the electorate in Iowa, New Hampshire and in the United States as a whole.
Even in dealing with Iraq, Ron Paul has not tapped the real anger of the American electorate. The great sin of the Iraq War to most people is not that it is clearly "unconstitutional." Perhaps, even a President ordering nuclear attack on a nation that has launched nuclear missiles against us might be technically unconstitutional because only Congress can declare war, but Americans, by probably 90 percent, would want the President and the world to know that if we fell under nuclear attack that our President would respond immediately and decisively.

The Iraq War of course posed no imminent danger, and the Constitutional violation is clearer than the hypothetical scenario I just mentioned. However the greatest evil of the Iraq War is far more the fact that it is a war that is against every real interest of the United States. It is a war based entirely on lies. It is a war for Israel led by Jewish extremist Neo Cons (Main Stream Republicans) and their allies in media, a war that has killed over 3,500 of our young military personnel, wounded or maimed at least 50,000 more, will cost us trillions of dollars, and will spur increasing hatred and terrorism against Americans and unrelenting damage to American economic interests.

How can anyone run for President of the United States and not mention the overwhelming power of the Israeli-First, Jewish extremists in American politics and media. Everyone in Washington, D.C. and in practically the entire world knows that the political fundraising process, Presidential policy and Congressional process is firmly under the control of the Zionists who are using the United States as its worldwide hit man, a role that is doing us irreparable harm. Jewish extremists are the political fundraisers and power brokers and they also dominate the mass media, the single greatest influence in politics.
What must Paul do to have any real chance of winning or making a bigger impact? I think he should do exactly what I did in Louisiana (Duke ran for the US Senate and lost), and for Ron Paul to follow exactly the same advice Ron Paul gave in his newsletters for others, take up my campaign issues with passion and purpose."
(End of David Duke's paraphrased remarks)

Now here is what Ron Paul said about the David Duke loss in Louisiana:

"David Duke received 44% of the vote in the Senate Primary race in Louisiana 60 percent of the white vote, and 9 percent of the black vote! This totaled 100,000 more votes than the current governor when he won.
Duke lost the election but he scared the blazes out the Establishment. If the official Republican wouldn't have been ordered to drop out, he might have won. Certainly there would have been a run-off.
Duke's platform called for tax cuts, no quotas, no affirmative action, no welfare, and no busing...

To many voters, this seems like just plain good sense. Duke carried baggage from his past, the voters were willing to overlook that. If he had been afforded the forgiveness an ex-communist gets, he might have won.

...David Broder, also of the Post and equally liberal, writing on an entirely different subject, had it right: 'No one wants to talk about race publicly, but if you ask any campaign consultant or pollster privately, the sad reality that a great many working-class and middle class white Americans are far less hostile to the rich and their tax breaks than they are to the poor and minorities with their welfare and affirmative action programs."

Liberals are notoriously blind to the sociological effects of their own programs. David Duke was hurt by his past. How many more Dukes are waiting in the wings without such a taint?"

Ron Paul 1990 comment quoted in the 'New Republic'.

Gee, sounds like a mutual admiration society between the two of them and their organizations.