May 30, 2008
The blogosphere is "Dunkin'" common sense over a scarf

Again, I apologize, I seem to have been missing for another week or so.  Life is like that, sometimes.  Chalk it up to some needed down time and a family reunion.

So one of the 'big' stories on my return to the blog world was the whole Rachel Ray kerfluffle over her scarf?

So initially I assumed there was some dark sinister message hidden in her headgear, but then I saw the picture you see to the right.

And I don't get it.

Oh, I get the fact that it is somewhat similar to a kaffiyeh, the traditional Arab headdress worn by our enemies in the middle east.

But at the same time, it is a scarf, around the neck of a woman who hosts a TV cook show, and who has never to my knowledge made a single political stance on the war or on Islamfacism.

So the accusations that this was something nefarious fell on deaf ears here.

With due respect to the people who have taken a solid offended stance on this, I have to solidly disagree.  This was a much ado over nothing.

What concerns me is that this outcry has only served to once again make conservatives appear weak and shrill, and gives the impression that they will overreact to the slightest provocation.

While I agree that appeasement and Dhimmitide is a problem that needs to be watched,the conservatives appear to have taken it to a level that begins to become a witch hunt.

When we start jumping at shadows and shooting at phantoms, we set ourselves up for ridicule and derision, and like the boy who cried wolf, when the time comes to demand action for a more serious threat to our freedoms, we will not be listened to, and incidents like this will come front and center as the rationale.

Put simply, there are far more obvious and odious things to get worked up over.  This is what it looks like:  A scarf.  Nothing more.

The Bloggers need to save their outrage for a more worthy target.

Michelle Malking notes:

"In post-9/11 America, vigilance must never go out of style"

Sure.  But if we are so busy watching their wardrobe, will we be able to see the bomb in their hands?

Now, Dunkin' Donuts caved and quickly pulled the ad, and Ray's statement about the scarf was more than reasonable, so even Malkin, despite her stance, admits that she thinks this was inadvertant.

But despite that, despite DD's reassurance, and the fact that they were willing to pull the ad to avoid conflict, the donut batter is still on the face of those who saw a scarf and cried kaffiyeh!

I have a lot of reading and blogging to catch up on.  I hope I find something a bit more important to comment on.

Posted by guitarplayr at May 30, 2008 12:38 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Yeah, this one was really stupid. As is Rachel. It was just a style point.

Sometimes a cigar is just a presidential marital aid.

Hairy

Posted by: Hairy Buddah on May 30, 2008 08:15 PM
2. In this entire hullabaloo did anyone just take time out to notice that there is a carbon dioxide emitting sparkling beverage in her hand? The container has paraffin coatings, plastic top and a plastic straw all from carbon based products that are the root cause of 'global warming' and she is doing this pollution with a ‘corporate oil company’ smile on her face.
In addition, we all know that the consumption of donuts takes wheat away from the world’s devastated poor who need the wheat and sugar according to Barak who say he wants to send one half of our Ag production to the countries of the world facing devastation because of the tragedy of climate change.
And so what if she is wearing a scarf that may have been given to her by the much misunderstood and real nice guy Hamas leader Khaled Meshal. As soon as Obama can travel over there and have a heart to heart with Khaled there will be peace in the Middle East and more women in the US can/may have to wear one, too.

Posted by: Bob Snakely on May 30, 2008 09:38 PM
3. I always had a funny feeling about her.

Posted by: C.B.Ross on May 31, 2008 12:07 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?