May 06, 2008
Fighting Democrat Running for Congress 8th CD

James Vaughn for US Representative, 8th Congressional District Would Like to Hear Your Views. I believe that political campaigns should address the issues and voters should challenge the candidates. When we create honost dialogue , we create public awareness and eveyone wins.

(Serving most of King and Pierce Counties)

Veterans, angry over Iraq, run for Congress

Potentially an unprecedented number of ex-service members will be running for office. The fighting Democrats, as some call themselves, say their military experience could give them the credibility to criticize the war without being dismissed out of hand by the GOP as naive and weak on defense, as the Bush administration has often done.

Before our government commits our sons and daughters to harms way, all political avenues need to be exhausted. Unfortunately, this did not happen with our war in Iraq. My initial contention with the war was that United Nation inspectors had not found any weapons of mass destruction and were still investigation when we invaded.
I am angered at the way the Republican leaders have handled the war. We all know the current administration doesn't hesitate to stand in front of the troops when it comes to a photo-op, but never stands behind them when it comes to providing the armor necessary to fight in Iraq, or the benefits promised when they return home.
We all would like to see our troops come home. However, common sense tells us that this is not going to happen overnight. We have lost too many lives in this war and too much is at stake for us not to achieve stabilization and the proper reconstruction of Iraq. I feel a moral conviction to choose the right course of action not only for our country but for the Iraqi citizens.
Given our current deficit, rising gasoline prices, we need Iraq to help us financially in order to continue to help them restore their country. Iraq has the second largest oil deposits in the world and by receiving a portion of the oil we can correct our federal deficit. An option is for us to reach an agreement with the Iraqi government to sell us the oil at a reduced rate for a specified number of years. Iraq government gets paid, our gas prices drop and we pay down the budget deficit. Everyone wins. In addition, by using the oil revenues to reduce our federal deficit, our dollar will strengthen in the global market. As a result, the price of food, imports and other commodities will drop.
Now that we are mired in rebuilding Iraq, a responsible exit strategy is essential. Unfortunately, I hear candidates spouting anti-war rhetoric and an immediate reduction in troops. These comments do nothing but incite the terrorists and place our service members in greater danger. We need to remember the saying, "United We Stand, Divided We fall."
What do we feel about our "American Way of Life and what do we say to our service members when:
• American corporations send jobs overseas.
• $130 Billion was invested in overseas emerging markets last year, rather than investing in the U.S. economy.
• $40 Billion military hardware contract was sent to France.
• They return home to poor employment prospects while our government is gutting our economy and playing E-Bay with our jobs.
• We have done nothing to provide affordable health care for their families.
• Our educational system is loosing ground to other nations.
• Our transportation systems are in disrepair.
• Individuals sit at home intentionally abusing L&I, welfare, and unemployment in order to draw a government check while we go to work each day.
• Our government does not provide adequate care for Veterans.
• Social Security is projected to be bankrupt in the year 2018 and our government spent $21 billion dollars on foreign aid last year and projects to spend $13.2 billion dollars on Pork Barrel Projects.

We need to say, "No More". I am prepared to address the issues and fight the battles but cannot do it alone. In the 2006 election for US Congress, 250,000 people voted and the outcome was determined by 7,341 votes. There are projections that the upcoming election will have a record number of voters. Please join me in an effort to obtain 200,000 voters to unite into one voice. This "Fighting Democrat" needs your support.

If elected my job is to represent the voters. My answer to every question listed below is "YES". How would you answer the following questions?
Agriculture:
1. Should we protect our farm land?
2. Should we deregulate laws that hinder the cultivation of farm land?
3. Should we protect farmland from the eminent domain laws?
4. Do you see agriculture as a critical part of our Homeland Security and economic security?

Economy:
1. Do you believe it is wrong to let someone sit at home and draw a paycheck, while the rest of us go to work?
2. Should we stop investments in overseas emerging markets (last year $130 Billion) and invest in our country?
3. Should we stop earmarking funds (this year we have $13.2 Billion identified as Pork Barrel Projects)?
4. Should we run government like a business and cut out the waste? (For example a loophole that gives sexual predators money for college-has been used to buy clothes, CD players and other questionable items?)
5. Should we dramatically reduce the amount of foreign aid (last year $21 Billion)?

Education: The University of Washington has 2,884 international students and Washington State University has 1,430 international students. Nationwide the numbers of foreign students increased last year to 582,984. Since our tax dollars pay for public universities and community colleges do you believe our citizens should have priority for higher education before allowing admission to foreign students?
Exiting Iraq: We all want our service members home. Unfortunately many candidates are spouting anti-war rhetoric and calling for immediate troop withdrawal that incite the Islamic terrorists and place our service members in greater danger.
1. Do you feel it is wrong for politicians and candidates exploit the service members for their own political gain?
2. Do you believe we should use the oil in Iraq to pay for the cost of the war and to rebuild the country?
Healthcare Issues:
Why are we paying for three types of medical coverage: 1.Medicare-Medicaid 2.Worker's Compensation and 3.Private or personal medical insurance.

Let's Do The Math and see what happens when we combine the three programs together.

American Health Insurance Plans' Center for Policy and Research shows that the average cost for an individual plan in the year 2006 was $2,015 per year.

Consider that the insurance companies are making 40% in commissions and profits the actual amount that goes towards medical coverage is $1,209 .

Census Bureau shows that 53 % of our citizens are employed. 47% are under 18 over 65 or unemployed for various reasons. If every working person pays one non-working citizen we more than cover the costs for universal medical coverage.

If medical costs for one individual costs $1,209, we need to double that cost to cover a second person or come up with $2,418.

1. The average American family spends $702 on Medicare each year.
2. There are 2,080 work hours in a year x $1 per hour paid to L&I = $2,080
3. $2080 paid into L&I plus $702 paid into medicare = $2,782 dollars and we only needed $2,418.
It appears that we are already paying enough into L&I and Medicare to pay for the medical costs for everyone.
With a single pay scenario, people continue to choose their physicians, doctors' clinics and hospitals as they always have. We the citizens of Washington State insure ourselves (24 hours a day) by deducting a set amount from every employee's pay check. Would you be in favor of this concept?
Ask yourself, why this has not been previously addressed.

1. Could the reason be that, this concept will eliminate government agencies and politicians do not want to loose potential votes?
2. Could it be that the insurance companies are one of the largest contributors to political campaigns?
3. Could it be due to insurance lobbyists?

Social Security:
1. Do you believe it is wrong for individuals to be taxed when they receive Social Security benefits?
2. Do you believe citizens receiving Social Security and who continue to work on a temporary or full time basis they should be exempt from paying into the system?
3. Should we get rid of the Pork, Foreign Aid and other programs and put the money back into Social Security where it belongs?
Tax Reform: History of the B&O Tax: At the economic low point of the depression in 1933, Washington enacted the Gross Tax Receipt, now known as the B&O Tax. During this time property and income taxes plummeted and The State Department of Revenue described the tax as "temporary, emergency revenue".
Business and Occupation Tax (B&O): Otherwise know as a Gross Receipt Tax (GRT)
• GRT is a tax on all gross revenues incurred by a business not just the profits.
• GRT is a stealth tax which is hidden from the consumer.
• GRT is a tax on a business whether they make a profit or not.
• GRT is imposed on each stage of the service or product and creates a pyramid effect which is in turn passed on to the consumer.

B&O Tax is politically popular because this pyramid tax is embedded in the cost of the product at each step and so is almost entirely hidden from consumers. Note: Washington State Legislature passed a law banning pyramid schemes and yet the B&O Tax is a pyramid scheme.

This is one of the most biased taxes and undemocratic taxes that I know. For example, the state cut the B&O Tax for Boeing from .004235 to .002956 Boeing use to pay $2,117 and now pays $1,478. Small companies that provide a service pay $7,500. This is not a fair or logical formula for equitable taxation and small business is crippled by this tax.

Rather than going through the costs of conducting an Initiative to eliminate the B&O Tax, would you favor legislation at the national level that bans pyramid taxes? In this scenario our state would have to replace the B&O Tax with a fair corporate tax?

Veteran Issues: Our country created the disaster in Iraq that has cost thousands of lives and crippled many more thousands. We are spending billions to rebuild Iraq and at the same time shuffling the disabled veterans to the bottom of the deck. Currently, we have over 700 seriously disabled service members at Fort Lewis.

With today's technology and the internet, would you support a program that assists our disabled Veterans with a home office and the training so they can work from home in a meaningful profession?
Veterans Families: The service members that leave the military are entitled to medical through the VA Hospitals. However, there is no coverage for the family members. Until the service member can obtain employment and work the required number of days to be eligible for medical coverage, the family members are at risk. Would you support legislation that provides family members one year of medical care from the date the service member was discharged?
Veterans -PTSD: I believe that we need to connect our Veterans returning from Iraq, with Vietnam Veterans and other Veterans that have served in combat. Specifically, we need model Veterans - Citizens in a functional family that have over come the adversity of war that are active and successful in the community. At the very least, we need to listen to them and let them educate us.
Would you support an organization that would create a link between the two generations of Veterans on the lines of the Big Brother concept?





Posted by jimvaughnforcongress at May 06, 2008 06:15 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Jim,

Are you sure you are running under the banner of the right party? Your proposals sound allot more Conservative than Liberal and I think you will find it fairly hard to enact any of these changes under the new Democratic banner as seen on moveon.org and the dailykos.

I wish you the best of luck on your endeavor, even though I would like to see Dave Reichert reelected. His office has lent me a hand a few times in the past couple of years and I am not even in his district (I am down in the 3rd CD). It turns out that my Representative's (Baird-D) website claims I am not part of his district (even though I have been since 2000) and so his site will not even except email from me. I am glad to see that you do not feel that pulling out of Iraq is good for the country as I am in Iraq right at this very moment (Here as a civilian contractor working with the troops in a support role) and I can tell you things have gotten much, much better here. Sure there is still a war going on, but it is no where as near as bad as it was even a year ago. We are winning this war and it would be really sad to see all the sacrifices our brave men and women have made be in vain.

Posted by: TrueSoldier on May 6, 2008 11:17 PM
2. Dear True Soldier,

I am with the right party. As a small business owner, I believe that this is where I belong. The democratic party has lost sight of a lot of issues in the name of partisan politics. Actually, I can appreciate your position regarding Dave Reichert. I vote for the person not the party. I vote for the issues not the party. Truth be told, I voted for Dave in the last election and would have done so in this election if he had kept a promise that he made to me. Tells you something about how I feel about Darcy Burner.

Now I am running against Dave because he broke a promise to me and turned his back on the disabled veterans. Here is the rest of the story.

Last spring, I was at a Veteran Fair sponsored by Dave Reichert. I informed Dave that Sally and I have a business that is focused on assisting veterans obtain full time employment, with the priority going to individual returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. I told Dave that we would like to help the seriously disabled veterans. We are spending billions to rebuild Iraq and at the same time shuffling the disabled veterans to the bottom of the deck. At that time we had over 700 seriously disabled service members at Fort Lewis.

With today's technology and the internet, I was seeking money to fund a program to assist our disabled Veterans with a home office and the training so they can work from home in a meaningful profession. Dave told me that if the grant process did not work out that he would submit a bill through appropriations.

Common sense tells me that this would receive unanimous approval in Washington D.C. It would be political suicide to vote against such a bill to assist disabled Veterans. This would have been a huge boost to Congressman Reichert's career. However, repeated e-mails and telephone calls to his office did not result in any action.

Dave Reichert has not passed one piece of legislation. Currently he is ranked 419 out of 439 congressmen, which is below representatives from Guam, Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico that are non-voting members. Dave Reichert has sponsored 32 bills since Jan 4, 2005, of which 28 haven't made it out of committee and zero were successfully enacted.
Typically, new employees have a 90 day probationary period to prove themselves. Dave Reichert has had a two year probationary period. The job is not a good fit for him or for us. The Republican Party wants to keep Dave in office and not because he is a strong congressman. Dave will do whatever the party tells him to do in order to survive. We have seen that he is a yes man for George Bush. I ask you, "If Dave Reichert were in the board room with Donald Trump on the apprentice, what would Donald say?"

Posted by: Jim Vaughn on May 7, 2008 07:28 AM
3. Despite the fact that Dave Reichert was a good law enforcement officer, I have to say he's done a poor job in Congress. If I were in a different situation, I'd be tempted to challenge him!

I don't count number of bills as any sort of success litmus - I want less government intervention, not more - but I'm frustrated with his views on illegal immigration and other issues. Time and again I have sent him polite questions, asking how a law enforcement officer could support lawbreaking and I always receive the same email response, which never addresses my questions, but is just a blanket statement.

I also don't like his focus on the environment; it's obvious that he's taken this tack because he had the fear of God put in him last election and he thinks moderate Dems will keep him in office.

He doesn't have driving principles is what I'm saying. He doesn't take a stand on anything contentious and seems to only curry favour. I don't know why it seems that even decent people are changed by the Beltway (with only a handful of exceptions), but I think Reichert has been negatively changed by it as well.

Politicians have lost their way. They believe that they are infallible and have a right to control us by virtue of being elected. They are more interested in smear than actual progress. Taxes are high, Americans are seeing jobs shipped overseas, we are losing our language and culture and seem content to be the world's punching bag and all politicians seem to do is position themselves more advantageously in preparation for their next election. It's sickening, and it's a shame that Reichert has fallen prey to this.

You are absolutely WRONG on universal health care however, which is why I could never support you. It is not my obligation to pay for someone else; it's just NOT. I didn't have medical insurance for years and then subsequent jobs had mediocre insurance and I picked up the slack, even when I broke my leg and had to have a plate and screws put in, which was not cheap. If I'm not willing to pony up for my own health, why should some stranger be responsible for it? Children are not dying in the streets from lack of care; you only have to look at the spate of hospitals bankrupted by caring for illegals without insurance who aren't even supposed to BE in America to see that's not the case.

Government controlled programmes are NEVER the solution. They are bloated and inefficiently run. If you want to make a difference in health care, allow competition across states.

With regard to Social Security, it was never meant to be someone's retirement nest egg but supplemental to it.

It's unfortunate that you Democrats cannot fathom that a free market capitalistic economy has turned this country into the greatest one on earth in less than 200 years. "From zero to Hero" to paraphrase the Disney 'Hercules' line.

People need to be responsible for themselves; being American doesn't mean your life is devoid of hardship, struggle or sacrifice; it doesn't mean 'the wealthy' pay for your life, comfort and expenses. An entity (the government) three thousand miles away isn't supposed to be your Daddy; you are responsible for your own life. Anyone who claims otherwise is just an elitist who thinks they are smarter than the average American and therefore should control us and limit our choices. I utterly reject that.

Posted by: Hanya on May 7, 2008 10:51 AM
4. I appreciate your position and I think we are very close on a lot of the issues. Particularly agree with your comment that"Politicians have lost their way. They believe that they are infallible and have a right to control us by virtue of being elected. They are more interested in smear than actual progress. Taxes are high, Americans are seeing jobs shipped overseas, we are losing our language and culture and seem content to be the world's punching bag and all politicians seem to do is position themselves more advantageously in preparation for their next election. It's sickening, and it's a shame that Reichert has fallen prey to this."

I heard a quote to the effect that politicians think about the next election and statesmen think about the next generation.

I understand your feelings about universal health care and many people are on your side. You make a good point.

Sally and I have a staffing service that is focused on assisting veterans obtain full time employment. The first priority going to individual returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. If we cannot fill the positions with veterans we open the jobs up to the civilian sector. On numerous occassions we sent individuals to work and the first day on the job they claim an injury. We know that the injury did not occur on the job, but cannot prove otherwise. These individuals have no medical insurance and us an L&I claim to get treated for a pre-existing condition. It raises our L&I rates, which in turn causes us to raise our rates.

We also have approximately 4,000 service members in the National Guard and Reserves that lost their jobs serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. When they return home, the service member has medical for 5 years through the VA, but the family members are without insurance until they get employed. Unfortunately, many employers required the individuals to be with the company for 10 weeks before they are eligible. Even worse, many small companies cannot afford to offer medical insurance. From a personal standpoint, Sally and I pay $903.22 each month for medical insurance. There are months, particularly at tax time when we have to juggle bills because of the insurance.

I want to change the way we are billed for insurance. We are already paying enough into Medicare, Medicaid and L&I to cover the health care costs for everyone. We can reduce the number of government agencies,which reduces taxes and have medical coverage for everyone. I know you disagree and I know you are not alone.

One of the dangers I run in my campaign is that I am addressing the issues, taking a stand (after talking to thousands of voters to get their views)and offer solutions. By doing this, I will loose some votes.

I am frustrated at election time when none of the candidates have said anything substantial. I find myself looking to the independent candidates. Then I have the feeling that if I vote for them, I am throwing away my vote. I realize that most people will not agree with all my positions. I also recognize that I will loose some votes because individuals, like yourself, have a strong feeling about a particular issue that is in contradiction to my position.

I am firm on my health care position. If elected I need to represent everyone and my analysis shows that the majority of voters support health care reform. I suspect what you propose will probably be implemented. It is not a 100% solution but at this time an 80% solution on time is better than a 100% solution 5 years from now.

I undertand that I lost your vote and respect that. I hope by addressing the issues and being upfront I have gained your respect.

Jim


Posted by: Jim Vaughn on May 7, 2008 11:45 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?