January 11, 2008
Dem Pres Candidate calls for a recount in NH.

According to Foxnews.com, Dennis Kucinich has called on NH for a recount of the ballots:

Democrat Dennis Kucinich, who won less than 2 percent of the vote in the New Hampshire primary, on Thursday called for a recount to ensure that all ballots in his party's contest were counted.

He cites "serious and credible reports, allegations and rumors" about the integrity of Tuesday results.

Kucinich alluded to online reports alleging disparities around the state between hand-counted ballots, which tended to favor Barack Obama, and machine-counted ones that tended to favor Hillary Clinton. He also noted the difference between pre-election polls, which indicated Obama would win, and Clinton's triumph by a 39 percent to 37 percent margin.


I guess it is never to earlier to try to find votes.

Posted by TrueSoldier at January 11, 2008 05:33 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Of all the articles or events that caused you to raise you head from over in Iraq, you pick this one.

Kucinich was right. Something is fishy in NH.

Is he still on the ballots?

Posted by: swatter on January 11, 2008 06:55 AM
2. It really is sad that their is so little trust in our election system anymore.

Posted by: TrueSoldier on January 11, 2008 09:33 PM
3. By the way Swatter, I can honestly say that I have never had to duck my head over here in Iraq in the 8+ months I have been here. Only once have I had to wear body armor and that was a precaution in case of a possible attack (which never happened). Things are allot quieter here now than when I was here in 04 and spent allot of time inside of a bunker during rocket and mortar attacks. The only reason I am not on that often is due to the workload that I have and I take seriously as it benefits our fine Men and Women in Uniform.

Posted by: TrueSoldier on January 12, 2008 02:47 AM
4. True Soldier,

Are you having fun babysitting the oil..

Do you know the price of oil per barrel went from 27 dollars to over 100...
I have been lined up at the corporate gouge since 04.
By the way I want you on that wall I need you on that wall...Just another wall not that one.

Posted by: Publicbulldog on January 12, 2008 08:53 AM
5. PublicChihuahua (your bark is much worse than your bite),

I am sooo glad that you are using your freedom of speech (Which is one of the many freedoms the military helps protect) in such a constructive way.

You might want to point out that the Liberal Treehuggers also have not allowed an oil refinery to be built in the last 30 years now, even thought the demand for refined oil (you know gasoline) has increasd dramatically, has allot to do with the price of fuel also.

And yes I am enjoying my time over here being with the troops (who are the real heroes though I doubt you see it that way). I guess you would not be able to understand why these brave men and women do what they do for the little bit of pay they get just so people like you can bad mouth them.

Posted by: TrueSoldier on January 12, 2008 09:21 PM
6. Truesoldier,
You are there to guard the de-jure monoplies interests.Blaming tree huggers for not allowing a refinery is a lame argument.I wonder if you would even be over there if we had allowed industrial cannabis to be a fuel source years ago instead of scheduling industrial cannabis in schedule 1.
As far as bad mouthing the military I beg to differ.I would rather you be guarding the mexican border where a criminal comes into our country at will,and puts our loved ones at risk.
Your theory of offensive defense is a scam that the ignorant fall for.I know it isnt exciting to guard our country at the borders,but that is where the real work is.You are on a mission that was started with a lie.I am not willing to pay 10 bucks for a cornish game hen and 3.50 for a gallon of gas because our government has eliminated the only legitamate competition for fossil fuel,and decided to conjour up a lie to stick our nose into the middle east so the de jure monoplies can rake in the profits...
Remember that.You are there for the benefit of the de jure monopolies,not me.I am lined up at the corporate gouge while you are protecting the
American big oil interests.By the way enjoy that jelly doughnut while you can,watch your six.A de jure monopoly is defined here: a de jure monopoly is a monopoly that is protected by law from competition. sorry to burst your bubble but I need my children to have more than a choice to live in a high rise,or protect de jure monopolies,and line up at corporate gouges.That is what you are fighting to protect right now.

Posted by: Publicbulldog on January 12, 2008 10:35 PM
7. I am more worried about getting killed by a mexican drug dealer that walked across the border driving without a license,than some radial islamic hiding behind the women and children and hiding in caves.
Our mission ended in Kyber pass.Thats when musical son of a bitch started.

Posted by: Publicbulldog on January 12, 2008 10:39 PM
8. Haha! I thought this primary was in Michigan, not Washington!

Does Kucinich EVER take off his tin-foil hat?

Posted by: Cydney on January 16, 2008 04:10 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?