I don't like this one bit.
And I didn't hear about it anywhere but in Michelle Malkin's blog. She reports that the energy bill foisted onto the public by the Democrat congress (and signed by President Bush--sigh) on Tuesday contains "a provision that mandates the phase-out of the 125-year old incandescent bulb in the next four to 12 years in favor of a new generation of trendy, supposedly energy-efficient Gorebulbs."
No way.
I HATE those compact flourescent bulbs (CFLs). The light they give off does not compare with the pleasant light of the incandescents. And whatever happened to choice?? I thought these libs claimed to be all about choice? If they self-righteously want others to use CFLs, they can create incentives. But simply taking away the choice of incandescent lights altogether goes way too far.
Some of you won't care at all that this is happening, but I'm going to have to contact my national representatives to complain, and I urge anyone who feels similarly to do likewise. Besides, those CFLs contain mercury. The disposal problem this creates will be enormous. And this, at a time when they fairly recently killed off the last available mercury thermometer at the drugstores.
Since they actually give people the "choice" whether to end a life in the womb, I consider it completely ridiculous that citizens are forbidden the choice of what kind of lighting they wish to have in their homes.
Completely. Insane.
Posted by MicheleDeRouis at December 20, 2007 10:15 PM | Email ThisThe best I can come up with is that if Bush weren't doing it, would we want the next President faced with these same questions. For example, would you rather have Condi try to talk to the terrorist nations (all the candidates seem to be saying this is why I mention it- some to one degree or the other) and fail or have a Jimmy Carter type (Huckabee-Obama-Edwards-Clinton) try it and who knows what will happen.
The same goes for the energy nonsense that Bush just signed.
Posted by: swatter on December 21, 2007 09:26 AM
I sense that Huckabee is a "crunchy-con" which perhaps explains why Medved shills for him every day on his radio show. Maybe it's just me, but I long to elect a real conservative in 2008. Is that too much to hope for?
Posted by: Bill Cruchon on December 21, 2007 02:45 PMSo far...feels great. (Thats where the thinking ends.)
Problem: CFL bulbs contain mercury. Mercury, in landfills, is bad. Hundreds of millions of units in landfills each year is worse. Therein lies the paradox...CFLs good...Mercury bad. Saving the planet? I don't think so. More feel good crap.
By the way, your Prius falls into the same paradox.
Posted by: k2 on December 21, 2007 03:11 PMJust buy em up! They don't go bad in storage.
If you buy too many, sell em on ebay at a premium!
"Leftists think they can use their head for a colonoscopy and then crab-walk across the blogosphere expecting all the world to think their new hats make them look smart."
Posted by: Obi-Wan on December 22, 2007 02:25 PM