October 27, 2006
Are polls really a measure of outcome, or tool used by the MSM to suppress the vote?

The phone rings and it's a person interested in your views for a poll being conducted. Do you answer his questions, do you lie when answering, or do you hang up?

I have answered the phone several times over the last couple weeks with callers doing "research" and looking for my viewpoint on the upcoming election. Once I'm aware of what they're after, I hang up. Why do I hang up, because I believe that all this polling is being used to create perception instead of measuring it.

So how reliable are polls when people lie? How reliable are they when people refuse to answer, especially if people who refuse are generally people like myself who are completely convinced that the MSM is biased and working with the Demorats?

Polls in 2004 were wrong. Exit polling was wrong. So why does the MSM jam polls down our throats if they have no credibility? Could it be that bogus polls are okay if they show Democrats winning and the polls might discourage Republicans from voting? I certainly think so.

Don't buy into polls as being a measure of public perception, because they only measure the viewpoint of people who respond to them, and I believe that more and more Republicans are telling pollsters to get lost. Pollsters can't know the party affiliation of all the people hanging up on them, and they can only guess at the breakdown of non-respondants. I'm convinced that a growing percentage of their calls are not being answered, and a growing majority of those people, like myself, are associated to one party.

Would you respond to a phone poll if someone called?.

Posted by mjcostello at October 27, 2006 09:30 AM | Email This
Comments
1. I generally refuse to answer the pollsters. The last poll I responded to was one concerning gambling (Tribal Casino's VS Non-Tribal) that I was positive was being put on by the TRIBES. I most likely told them what they did not want to hear. that the Tribes wanted to corner the market.

I feel that polls are generally inaccurate in most cases and used to gain political advantage in some way, particularly in today's Congressional Liars Club.

Posted by: John Carter on October 27, 2006 12:22 PM
2. Actually, the main pollsters in 2004 were pretty accurate statistically. (Exit polls are a different issue.) If you look at the 2004 Senate polls for instance, the major, non-partisan pollsters did pretty well. Survey USA actually overestimated the margins by 2% in favor of the GOP in the 15 polls they show on their website. The one pollster who didn't do very well was Zogby. The other majors were generally within the margin of error.

Of course, nobody should look at the polls and decide not to vote. That's just stupid.

Posted by: wayne on October 28, 2006 03:28 AM
3. I usually lie and pretend to be a Democrat. Maybe that's why their polls are always wrong, conservatives know what they are up to and just play along.

Posted by: Jeff B. on October 29, 2006 08:55 PM
4. Teenagers (especially boys) love to do this in the sex and drug surveys that public schools like to give them.

Posted by: Ann in Issaquah on November 2, 2006 03:49 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?