In looking over my newly arrived King County Voter's Pamphlet, I observe a different format than previous years---a format which has the appearance of being a built-in advantage for democrat candidates for public office.
It used to be that candidates for each partisan race, whether it be federal or local, would be grouped together. i.e., for U.S. Senate you would see all the democrat candidates followed by the republican candidates in the same section. Then for the next race--e.g., state legislature, you'd again see each party's candidates listed in the same section for that race, etc.
This year's pamphlet is vastly different: A "blue section" lists each race from federal on down to local--but ONLY the democrat candidates for all those offices are listed in each contest category . You have to flip all the way over to PAGE 21 before seeing any republican candidates whatsoever.
The people that put this pamphlet together HAVE to know that many people may not make it all the way through it and stop reading after the first few pages. So that would mean that they would only have read about the democrat candidates for all the offices, and in some instances people may believe that ONLY the democrat candidates are running for each office (I know, I know, you and I wouldn't make that mistake, but remember how many people marked their ballots in amazingly unintelligible ways in '04 and '05?? And the extreme difficulty the canvassing board had in trying to discern what the heck the voter meant?? These same voters have received this voter pamphlet!)
Some will argue--"well, this is just a differently organized way to present all the different contests involved for the primary". I say, bull--they used to group all parties represented in each race under the same section even for the primaries, so that voters could see ALL the candidates in the race instead of making it look to a casual observer that only democrats are running for these offices unless you look much further into the pamphlet.
I'm highly suspicious about this new format and call on King County Elections to go back to the old way of formatting the pamphlet, so as not to give democrats an unfair advantage. KCE is run by democrats, and they should go out of their way to ensure that it does not look like they are trying to give themselves an advantage by the way they have laid out the voter's pamphlet.
Of all the complaints I heard from voters about the '04 election debacle, not once did I hear them say that the KC voter's pamphlet was part of the problem, and in need of revamping in this way!
Posted by MicheleDeRouis at September 02, 2006 12:49 AM | Email ThisThe first thing you see when you look at the cover is a dark field in the middle (with apologies to the disabled artist, it takes a moment to make out the image of an eagle on crutches). The words printed in the middle of this dark field are "our vote democracy," which doesn't make sense. So your brain attempts to make a logical phrase out of it. Here's how it accomplishes this:
The word "our" is off center--it is ignored. The last three letters of "democracy" are purposefully set in a smaller font and lighter weight--they get absorbed by the black field. The end result: Your brain truncates the words in the body of the eagle into "vote democratic."
Then there is the image itself--an eagle on crutches. The American Eagle is most commonly associated with the presidential seal and the U.S. military. The artist is suggesting that the current adminstration is disabled, or has disabled the country. A secondary intent of the image would be to point out that the military is maiming soldiers.
I don't know whether to be amused or concerned about this. I'm beginning to think that democracy itself--not just the GOP--is under attack in this country. And King County is leading the way.
It will be interesting to find out who the Dean Logan replacement is. I wouldn't be surprised if he/she is behind this pamphlet.
Posted by: Organization Man on September 2, 2006 11:08 AMIf we want relief from this sewer of corruption, we have to show up and vote it out in numbers so overwhelming that these a**holes won't be able to call the election "too close to count."
Take it to the streets, people. Out-fox the foxes. Until we do, we will continue to get reamed.
Posted by: ERNurse on September 4, 2006 12:37 PM