Outgoing centrist Republican Congressman Sherry Boehlert believes that the House leadership will offer a plan that ties a hike in the minimum wage to association health plans (AHP). If this is true, I say bully for House Republican leaders.
My support for a minimum wage hike is somewhat selfish. The truth is that raising the mandated Federal wage floor is good for states like Washington where the mimimum wage is higher than what Congress requires. This will also be a good thing for the business climate of those local municipalties that mandate "living wages."
AHP's or small business health plans are one of those ideas that make a lot of sense, but don't get anywhere because of insurance lobby opposition. The idea is simple: get rid of certain loopholes and allow small businesses to pool together and purchase health plans the same way that large corporations and labor unions do on a regular basis. The benefit is that with more buying power small business can provide health care to their workers at a lower cost.
This legislation has the potential to kill two birds with one stone for the GOP by blunting Democrat attack ads on health care and the minimum wage. It also ends the effective but obvious political stunt pushed by Teddy Kennedy of opposing Congressional pay raises without an increase in the minimum wage.
Advice to the McGavick campaign: get on board!
Fortunately it will never pass the Senate.
In the good ole days it was recognized that "minimum wage" laws were bad for business. Liberals glommed onto that and turned it into a "greedy GOP" fantasy. Unfortunately more than a few moderate Republicans have bought into this fanciful notion.
The truth is minimum wage laws hurt low-income wage earners the most. Soft Republicans buy into this as misguided "compassionate conservatism". Where is the compassion in saying; "Congratulations! You now can earn $7.25! Sorry to hear that your job was eliminated."
I look forward to seeing it die a much-deserved death!
Posted by: alphabet soup on July 29, 2006 12:06 PMFortunately it will never pass the Senate.
In the good ole days it was recognized that "minimum wage" laws were bad for business. Liberals glommed onto that and turned it into a "greedy GOP" fantasy. Unfortunately more than a few moderate Republicans have bought into this fanciful notion.
The truth is minimum wage laws hurt low-income wage earners the most. Soft Republicans buy into this as misguided "compassionate conservatism". Where is the compassion in saying; "Congratulations! You now can earn $7.25! Sorry to hear that your job was eliminated."
I look forward to seeing it die a much-deserved death!
Posted by: alphabet soup on July 29, 2006 12:07 PMPerhaps nanny gov'ment should control "maximum wage" as well to control greed, and liberate more money for the po' folk? Bill Gates doesn't need his billions to have a comfortable life!
And Republicans wonder why some of the flock bolt for the Libertarian Party, which formed in the shadow of those great Nixonian years.
Mat, Liberty doesn't mean wages are dictated by the central government, whether by Dems or RepubliCrats.
Slaves have their wages dictated, because their owners know better.
Posted by: Nixon'sGhost on July 29, 2006 12:21 PMor http://snipurl.com/u2kk
... if the snake breaks.
Mat, Liberty doesn't mean wages are dictated by the central government, whether by Dems or RepubliCrats.
That's a very narrow and personal definition of liberty. I wonder if someone in poverty defines liberty as being able to pay the bills?
Posted by: Mathew on July 30, 2006 03:42 PM