May 11, 2012
For I-1185, we're doing everything we can -- we need you to do the same

We're committed to getting Initiative 1185 on the ballot to extend the 2/3's vote requirement for the Legislature to raise taxes. It passed with 64% of the vote just two years ago, the 4th time voters approved it. There is a clear consensus on the necessity of extending the 2/3's before the next legislative session. Olympia went hog wild in 2010 during that "2/3-less" session imposing $6.7 billion in higher taxes. They'll do it again next year with taxpayers being targeted with EVEN HIGHER job-killing, family-budget-busting, recession-extending tax increases without I-1185's protection and extension.

Jack & Mike Fagan are working non-stop processing petitions and donations and answering letters, phone calls, and email requests. To supplement our volunteers who are out collecting signatures, we've hired a paid signature gathering company to give voters more opportunities to sign I-1185's petitions. WE ARE FOCUSED ON SUCCESS. Each week, our PO Box in Spokane is packed with petitions and donations from supporters, but THEY'RE NOT COMING IN AT A PACE THAT ENSURES OUR SUCCESS.

There's not much time left to raise the funds and the signatures. So far, we've received lots of regular sized donations (650 individual donations since January) from our regular supporters and we're starting to see a groundswell of enthusiastic support from the business community like I-1053 received in 2010 (the endorsement by the Association of Washington Business last March has really inspired enthusiastic support from a broad cross section of the business community as exclusively reported by the Washington State Wire on April 21st - Business Groups Lining Up Behind Eyman's New Anti-Tax Initiative).

Here's a couple of recent emails:

From: Larry Jensen
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 7:07 PM
To: Tim Eyman

hi tim, i have been sending one filled petition a month and am putting one in the mail today. thanks for your efforts. we voted last night to send $1000 from the skagit farm bureau. larry
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bruce Beckett
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 9:22 AM
To: Tim Eyman
Subject: I-1185

Tim, The Washington Restaurant Association is sending $25,000 today to Voters Want More Choices. Thank you for your work on this important initiative, we appreciate it.

We also received two $100,000 donations from BP Oil and Conoco Phillips (not hard to guess why: Plan for oil-barrel 'tax' dies, SEATTLE TIMES, February 2, 2012, It would have cost taxpayers $2.75 billion and is the largest tax in Gregoire's $3.6 billion proposed tax package. "(Senator) Haugen said a barrel charge probably would be declared a general 'tax' by Lt. Gov. Brad Owen, and there's no way it could win a two-thirds legislative majority for tax hikes, as required by Tim Eyman's Initiative 1053).

And we are deeply grateful for and impressed by the donations received during the month of April and reported on May 7th by the "Association of Washington Business Political Action Committee" with some of their funds being used to I-1185 -- they filed as a "continuing" committee with the PDC (I would guess that this $5.1 billion tax increase in 2010 likely inspired their support for I-1185):

* Washington Realtors $25,000
* Port Blakely Tree Farms $10,000
* Equilon Enterprises $50,000
* Tesoro Companies $100,000

We are deeply grateful for this groundswell of support from our regular supporters (650 so far) and the business community -- a broad coalition of supporters who understand that united we stand, divided we fall -- but it's still not enough to guarantee I-1185's success. We need a lot more contributions and signatures during the months of May and June to ensure that voters get their 5th opportunity to approve the 2/3 protection.

There is no limit on how much a person, company, or association can contribute to an initiative campaign because the voters will have the final say. Personal checks, company checks, association checks are fine:

Voters Want More Choices -- Save the 2/3's
PO Box 18250
Spokane, WA 99228
Campaign phone number: 425-493-8707

Street Address: N 7020 Wall St, Spokane, WA 99208

Tax ID # for Voters Want More Choices is 76-0713455

Checks made payable to "Voters Want More Choices -- Save the 2/3's"


I want to hear from you. We've been asking for contributions since we started. We are asking that you all participate and be as generous as possible.

Help us make this initiative a success (and help pay back Tim's leftover loan to I-1053 from a 2nd mortgage on his home).

Go to our website to help.

Posted by Tim Eyman at May 11, 2012 09:35 PM | Email This
Comments
1. "There is a clear consensus on the necessity of extending the 2/3's before the next legislative session. Olympia went hog wild in 2010 during that "2/3-less" session imposing $6.7 billion in higher taxes. They'll do it again next year with taxpayers being targeted with EVEN HIGHER job-killing, family-budget-busting, recession-extending tax increases without I-1185's protection and extension."

Well, Tim, if you don't really know or understand what you are doing, no one can call you a liar. What percentage of these donations goes to 'administrative' costs?

EYMAN RESPONDS: It turns out that nearly 90% of the donations to our committee go to the paid signature gathering company who compensates their people to collect signatures from voters who want to sign. The rest goes to printing petitions, mailing costs, phone, web, accounting, etc.

Also, some of the money we raise is being used to pay back the loan I made to I-1053 in 2010 (I took out a 2nd mortgage on my home and loaned the campaign $250,000 to help ensure I-1053 got on the ballot - without it, voters wouldn't have had the chance to give I-1053 a 64% vote.

Posted by: dorky dorkman on May 12, 2012 07:41 AM
2. Tim: Are you suggesting that you won't be paying yourself out of contributions people make to your committee? That's not how it worked with I-1053, where contributors wound up paying you over $72K plus $36K each to Jack and Mike.

Also, no matter how you spin it, funds you apply to pay off your personal mortgage are funds paid to you. I understand you took out the loan to invest in your initiative business, and it's fine if folks want to help you pay off your personal debt -- as long as they know that's what they are doing.

EYMAN RESPONDS: Jack, Mike and I ask our supporters to donate to a separate, stand-alone compensation fund. If you don't want to donate to it, that's fine, but fortunately, lots of our supporters appreciate our efforts and want us to be compensated for our efforts so they are willing to voluntarily contribute to it.

Posted by: scottd on May 12, 2012 10:42 AM
3. Hey Dorky and ScottD,

Always a couple of Eyman haters out there. Have you ever questioned the PAID election consultants and workers that Gregoire and other worthless politicians have used in campaigns? Have you ever questioned the taxpayer money that was used to PAY worthless politicians for their work? They do not serve for free.
Tim and Jack and Mike have done more for taxpayers than ALL the politicians in this state combined. Do you actually expect them to dedicate their huge amounts of time and work on this stuff year in and out for free and out of their own personal savings? Don't be idiots. We contributors know full well how the VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS (not forced taxes) are being spent here - we are fine with it and we deeply appreciate their work.

Posted by: GoTim on May 12, 2012 11:35 AM
4. Go over to the 1053 website and drop a few shekels into the pot. We saw where Christine and the democrats went when they got rid of these kinds of limits.

Posted by: Daisy on May 12, 2012 11:58 AM
5. Interestingly enough, of the liberals who post here, the loudest are dorky dorkman and scottd, neither of whom are courageous enough to use a valid email address. Why is that? Is it that you can brook no dissension to the dying worldview you grasp and protect so desperately? Is it that you can't defend that same dying worldview? Or is is that you are simply scared?

Posted by: BeaPolite on May 12, 2012 12:28 PM
6. I beg your pardon. It's MikeyBoyScout who is the email coward - not dorky dorkman.

Posted by: BeaPolite on May 12, 2012 12:33 PM
7. Hi Bea : I don't see how my post was any "louder" than yours.

And that's a cute name you have. Did your mom give that to you -- or did you marry a guy named Polite?

I'm not sure why you need another email address. If you have something to say to me, you can do it right here.

Posted by: scottd on May 12, 2012 12:35 PM
8. LOL @ 7 - I notice you didn't actually answer him/her scott .... as usual. Deflection perfection at least you can claim that.

Posted by: RagnarDanneskold on May 12, 2012 12:40 PM
9. Hi Rags: You wanted me to respond to someone using an obvious pseudonym about why I don't give my full name? That's funny -- especially coming from you.

Posted by: scottd on May 12, 2012 12:51 PM