April 19, 2011
"Volunteer cleanup in parks seen by city union as threat"

The Times:

Chris Martin, president of the Seattle trash-collection company CleanScapes, says he was being a good corporate citizen when he offered to have his crews clean Westlake Park -- free of charge
...
But union officials representing the city's parks-maintenance workers didn't see Martin's offer as a goodwill gesture. They considered it an attempt to privatize city services and eliminate the union jobs of laborers responsible for downtown parks.
The Mayor's office welcomes CleanScapes' parks offer, but the company's earlier offer to snowplow streets last winter in exchange for an extension of its trash-collection contract did not go over well. Per a transportation department internal e-mail:
"CleanScapes is inching their way into several Departments' and unions' work and there are battles happening around this type of 'volunteer' work. ... Will need a hold on this until we get some input from City Labor Relations."
Cost-effective service delivery be damned. It's unacceptable to infringe on the unions' collective "bargaining rights" extortion privileges.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at April 19, 2011 12:53 PM | Email This
Comments
1. My favorite: "The union points to a pattern of CleanScapes offering to donate to the city services such as snow removal and the deployment of speed-watch trailers, without public notice or bids."
Caught! Donating without going through the bidding process!

Posted by: Ron on April 19, 2011 03:03 PM
2. Oh, the horror! I dream of a union-free America...oh, and liberal-free as well. Can't get here soon enough.

Posted by: bastiat fan on April 19, 2011 03:38 PM
3. Several years ago in Vancouver, a community group spruced up some downtown street islands one weekend. The public works union complained, and the city ended up paying the guy who would have been on call that weekend the overtime pay he missed out on. It's absolutely crazy.

Posted by: Alan on April 19, 2011 03:59 PM
4. The public employees' bad attitude is the problem; not the volunteerism being offered.

The purpose of govt. is not to provide certain jobs to certain people; it is to serve the taxpayers in the most efficient, effective way possible. Most Seattle politicians have lost all sight of that kind of common sense.

Perhaps the public employees are afraid that the private workers will do a better job!

Posted by: Monterey on April 19, 2011 05:20 PM
5. Monterey:

They have every reason to be afraid. My experience, from being FORCED to belong to TWO unions in my life, is that union labor is LAZY. Of course not all of them, but the incentive to do the bare minimum is definitely there.

Posted by: bastiat fan on April 19, 2011 05:49 PM
6. Stefan....why do you hate those poor Union leaders? They are folks just like you.....well that's if you're John Gotti.

Posted by: Dengle on April 19, 2011 07:01 PM
7. Uunions exist to accrue power & benefits for their membership. That's it, nothing else.

Posted by: jimt on April 19, 2011 07:57 PM
8. The post contains a hint as to what CleanScapes was really trying to do with their offer:

... but the company's earlier offer to snowplow streets last winter in exchange for an extension of its trash-collection contract did not go over well.

Such behavior was part of an overall scam:

The union points to a pattern of CleanScapes offering to donate to the city services such as snow removal and the deployment of speed-watch trailers, without public notice or bids.

This, of course, is the real purpose of CleanScapes' offers: to circumvent the public-bidding process, a process which exists to prevent corruption in awarding of government contracts. I hope CleanScapes is now barred from bidding on government contracts for an appropriate period of time.

(Of course, we already know how much this site loves a union-busting-wannabe governor who also ladles out huge greasy slabs of pork to a drunken legacy crony.)

I'll be at a public park on Earth Day (Saturday), improving it for free. And sleazy government profiteers like CleanScapes will get none of the credit for my actual volunteering. See you there, fellow civic-minded folks!

Posted by: tensor on April 19, 2011 09:47 PM
9. tensor, careful because the park employees will be all over your bee-hind for cleaning up. Then they'll have to pay a city employee for the work that you did that they didn't "get" to do!

Posted by: Michele on April 19, 2011 09:56 PM
10. tensor, careful because the park employees will be all over your bee-hind for cleaning up. Then they'll have to pay a city employee for the work that you did that they didn't "get" to do!

Actually, they thank us for completing, in one day, a major project they would have needed months to perform. (We don't do the daily maintenance, because the employees already do that; we horde of volunteers tackle big, one-off "sweeps" of neglected areas.)

Again, the difference here is between the actual volunteer efforts of interested local citizens, and the sleazy attempt by a profiteering company to circumvent a public anti-corruption law. See you at the park!

Posted by: tensor on April 19, 2011 10:11 PM
11. Not suprised!

Posted by: Laurie on April 20, 2011 09:08 AM
12. Parents at our local school offered to repaint a fading map on the local playground. Union said no way. At another nearby school, parents offered to do some trimming of bushes which had long been neglected, union said no way. Parents wanted to hold some after school activities on the school grounds. In the end dealing with the unionized janitor was more hassle than just picking another location. And all this happens in schools with some of the highest WASL scores and other measures of student success.

People want to help out. Unions say, no way.

Posted by: Jeff B. on April 20, 2011 09:28 AM
13.

Posted by: What's Earth Day? on April 20, 2011 03:13 PM
14. Who's working for whom? From the linked article:

"At the union's request, the city agreed not to accept CleanScapes services at Westlake Park."

So now unions determine city policy? No wonder Seattle is such a cesspool of brain-dead liberalism.

Posted by: FurryGuyJeans on April 20, 2011 07:46 PM
15. This is how it is done folks:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8qFvo2qJOU

Posted by: Difranco on April 21, 2011 06:57 AM
16. tensor, I have to admit you almost had me with the argument about circumventing the public bidding process.. But then I had another sip of coffee and thought "hey, wait a minute - the public bidding process isn't meant to prevent the CITY from receiving something of value, rather the people making contracting decisions." In other words, you would have a great point if they were offering to scrape the driveways of government officials or clean up their yards, but as described so far here, it sounds to me like they are just trying to offer higher value to the City to make themselves an attractive contractor. How again is that a bad thing?

Posted by: RookieRick on April 21, 2011 07:20 AM
17. tensor - just don't leave any skid marks. Just sayin'

Posted by: Crusader on April 21, 2011 12:10 PM
18. if the unions were cleaning the parks why do volunteer need to do the job? because maybe they weren't.

Posted by: Ron K on April 21, 2011 08:17 PM
19. Local community groups should form and take care of their local parks, with or without the backing of the union. If enough parks are kept clean, the city will be forced to divert money from the parks (union) budget to other core city functions. This could include additional services, police, plowing and pothole funding. Spending the money saved for additional bike lanes would make the mayor happy, and help clean up the environmental civic mindedness of Seattle.

Posted by: Brandon R on April 21, 2011 08:22 PM
20. We are now catching up with Vancouver, BC, as it happened to us when we lived there in 1971. A strip of non-used road was next to our rental home. Weeds were head high and a trailer full of trash was spread throughout the 12 foot strip.

My family and I cut the weeds and paid to cut the grass. The next week a Vancouver Policeman was at the door and told us, if we ever touched that area again, we would be arrested. As we were depriving city workers of their jobs, by doing their job for them.

That and a bit more, created a situation where I closed my business there and returned to the USA, where for 40 years I could wait for Seattle to become Vancouver, Canada. A great step forward for city unions and another step back for those who just want a nicer place to live.

Posted by: Sam C on April 23, 2011 12:39 PM
21. We are now catching up with Vancouver, BC, as it happened to us when we lived there in 1971. A strip of non-used road was next to our rental home. Weeds were head high and a trailer full of trash was spread throughout the 12 foot strip.

My family and I cut the weeds and paid to cut the grass. The next week a Vancouver Policeman was at the door and told us, if we ever touched that area again, we would be arrested. As we were depriving city workers of their jobs, by doing their job for them.

That and a bit more, created a situation where I closed my business there and returned to the USA, where for 40 years I could wait for Seattle to become Vancouver, Canada. A great step forward for city unions and another step back for those who just want a nicer place to live.

Posted by: Sam C on April 23, 2011 12:39 PM
22. NooPC.com is useful site for those who need help with computer or laptop

NoobPC
Fix Help

Posted by: noobpc on April 26, 2011 06:58 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?