March 31, 2011
Unintended Consequences?

Seattle City Councilmember Tim Burgess is sponsoring legislation to make "wage theft" a crime.

Of course cheating someone out of earned wages is wrong and should incur serious consequences, which it already does. The proposal is to add criminal penalties.

The primary motivation here seems to be making a show of helping illegal immigrants, while not holding them accountable for their own violations.

Ironically, this measure could have the unintended consequence of helping to reduce illegal immigration. One of the attractions of illegal immigrant labor is its greater willingness to work outside the constraints of labor laws. As the regulatory gap between illegal immigrant and other labor narrows in practice, there will be fewer jobs available to illegals and consequently less of an incentive to relocate here illegally.

Burgess was a conservative Republican before reinventing himself as a left-wing Democrat to run for Council. Even if inadvertently, he might be advancing conservative policies at City Hall after all.

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at March 31, 2011 09:30 PM | Email This
Comments
1. I keep getting large portions of my paycheck stolen from me. Unfortunately it is the politicians from both parties that not only allow it but support it.

Posted by: Lysander on March 31, 2011 10:59 PM
2. The primary motivation here seems to be making a show of helping illegal immigrants, while not holding them accountable for their own violations.

The primary motivation is to prevent theft from our most vulnerable workers:

Now, many workers, in such industries as construction and janitorial, are staying on the job without pay for weeks or even months, hoping things will get better. In the end, when they do quit -- or are fired -- many are unable to get the pay employers owe them.

Even severely twisted logic can't hide the basic point:

As the regulatory gap between illegal immigrant and other labor narrows in practice, there will be fewer jobs available to illegals and consequently less of an incentive to relocate here illegally.

Which is a convoluted way of saying, if we make exploitation and theft harder for dishonest employers, such employers will have less of an incentive to seek vulnerable employees.

Who here amongst us is supposed to hate capitalism, again? Because admitting that laws are needed to protect workers sounds pretty left-wing to me.

Posted by: tensor on March 31, 2011 11:32 PM
3. Ahh, well... it's always good to see that when the chips are down, Republicans whine about illegal immigration and labor, but are quite willing to look the other way when it benefits them directly:

Proposed Texas immigration law contains convenient loophole for ‘the help’

Posted by: demo kid on April 1, 2011 04:32 AM
4. Stefan, if one wished to stop illegal immigration based on cheap availability of jobs, such as in Arizona, surely the swiftest way to do so would be extreme criminal penalty and enforcement on the employer, by the same token?

If you made it, say, a felony to aide illegal employment, what sane person would hire someone undocumented if they risked a felony rap?

Posted by: Joe Szilagyi on April 1, 2011 06:24 AM
5. Hey Joe the State of Washington regularly hires and supports illegal aliens with Taxpayer Funds, what should happen to Gregoire and Comapany?

Posted by: Smokie on April 1, 2011 08:22 AM
6. Leftists are just one continual stream of unintended consequences and unfortunately that's not an April Fool's joke.

For example the new $2 billion bailout discovered in Obamacare. Easter Eggs of hypocrisy and deficit. That's what is in store when you support the left.

Posted by: Jeff B. on April 1, 2011 08:25 AM
7. Well, no problem: we can fix the entire city wide illegal alien problem by disqualifying illegals from this protection, inviting employers to rip them off the same way they rip us off by being here.

Posted by: Hinton on April 1, 2011 02:03 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?