September 19, 2010
Columbian newspaper endorses I-1053 (interestingly, they opposed I-960), joining editorial boards at the Seattle Times & the Everett Herald in supporting reinstatement of the 2/3's

From: Our Expanded Team of co-sponsors for I-1053, the "Save The 2/3's Vote For Tax Increases Initiative": Tim Eyman, Jack Fagan, Mike Fagan, Mike Dunmire, Senator Don Benton, Senator Janea Holmquist, Erma Turner, Nancy Nelson, Dagny Lord, Keli Carender, Senator Pam Roach, Rep. Matt Shea, John Ahern & Ken Morse

The Seattle Times and Everett Herald have already endorsed I-1053 (SEATTLE TIMES, 7/21/2010, Initiative 1053's 2/3's -- once more with feeling and EVERETT HERALD, 9/10/2010, I-1053 forces focus on reform). Both of these newspapers supported I-960 in 2007 and opposed this year's legislative suspension of the 2/3's protection and its many sunshine/transparency policies.

But Sunday's pro-1053 editorial by the Columbian is especially interesting because they opposed I-960 in 2007. Why the switch? Olympia's mistreatment of the taxpayers this session and their lack of focus on reform -- the Columbian is not alone. Many, many citizens who opposed I-960 did so because they believed politicians like Governor Christine Gregoire who promised no-new-taxes and Majority Leader Lisa Brown who promised tax increases would be a last resort -- and after this year's legislative session, these trusting folks feel like they've been played as suckers -- they feel betrayed.

Here's some highlights from the Columbian's Sunday editorial 'Yes' on I-1053 -- Two-thirds approval for tax increases is necessary for low-performing Legislature:

* One of the most frequent but misleading indictments of Initiative 1053 is that it will make our state more like California. ... This incorrectly implies that Washington state would venture for the first time down the two-thirds-requirement path if I-1053 is approved. History quickly contradicts that point. As I-1053's proponents have written, the two-thirds requirement has been intermittently applied in our Legislature since 1993. "In those 17 years, during legislative session when it's been in effect, tax hikes were a last resort resulting in more reform and fewer taxes. When Olympia suspends it (like this year), tax increases become a first resort with less reform and much higher taxes."

* ... There is no doubt that (1) the Democrat-led Legislature this year rushed to suspend the two-thirds requirement of Initiative 960 of 2007; (2) revenue was raised this year by almost $800 million, largely through tax increases, and (3) little to no effort was made to reform government. Those three realities lead The Columbian to recommend a "Yes" vote on Initiative 1053.

* We do so because legislators have abdicated their responsibility to reform ways in which government services and programs are delivered. Instead of resetting government and making it more efficient, lawmakers have lazily resorted to hackneyed budget solutions that are obsolete in this, the greatest economic crisis in seven decades. Democrats, especially, in the Legislature have only talked about reform, while at the same time refusing to make unionized state workers share in the same recession-related burdens that private-sector workers have incurred.

* Thus, we are driven to this editorial stance by the legislators' refusal to perform, their unwillingness to step up to the plate and proffer innovative strategies to deal with record deficits. Perhaps if their tax-increasing tendencies are stifled by passage of I-1053 they will turn in desperation to reform and solid strategies for cost control.

* Three years ago we opposed Initiative 960 (another two-thirds requirement for tax increases) on the grounds that legislators should be allowed to do their jobs and be held accountable in subsequent elections. Much has changed in those three years. The Legislature has failed so miserably in multiple budget crises that we now believe a strong message should be sent: Forget tax increases during a recession. I-1053 delivers that message.

* We acknowledge that lawmakers can modify or suspend an initiative after two years. That doesn't matter. If their performance doesn't improve and this same message must be repeated in two years, so be it.

-- END --

The pro-960 coalition has only gotten bigger and broader because everyone saw how Olympia acts when it is not restrained by the 2/3's. Without I-1053, next year's legislative session will be even worse: lengthy debates not about whether to raise taxes, but simply which taxes to raise and by how much. With I-1053 in effect, the focus will be on government reform and prioritizing spending, something they've continually kicked down the road.

We ask everyone to please support I-1053 in November.

Learn more about I-1053 at our website.

Posted by Tim Eyman at September 19, 2010 03:17 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Lets hope they oppose Gates new I1098 Income tax, or we'll all be paying this income tax in two years,when they ratchet it downward and they will again throw out the I1053 2/3's protection.

Posted by: gs on September 20, 2010 02:21 AM
2. The demo-marxist ST shows it's "independence" from the demo-marxist party line when it financially benefits the Blethen family. What a profile in courage.

Smells like jumping on a bandwagon when it is already is rolling towards a victory.

On any other issue on any given day, nine times out of ten the ST will carry water for the demo-marxists. If you want all the news from the perspective of intersection at Broadway and John, then ST is your paper.

Posted by: Attila on September 20, 2010 08:48 AM
3. Remember!

A vote for Dave Reichert is a vote for Obama.

You don't want Obama to win do you?

Posted by: Jake on September 20, 2010 11:55 AM
4. As opposed to an obama communist?

I think Reichert sucks. But his fringe left opponent sucks worse.

Easy choice.

Posted by: Hinton on September 20, 2010 12:09 PM
5. Hinton, then you are PERSONALLY responsible for re-electing Obama

Posted by: Jake on September 20, 2010 12:29 PM
6. You know if Hinton is right and Reichert's opponent is a fringe left opponent and I have no reason to doubt it then GREAT. All the easier to defeat her in 2012 where our real focus must be.

But, noooo. These R-heads want to ensure another 1994 and start us on the pattern of repeating history.

What Hinton? You miss the Macarena that much?

In two years Hinton, when you are grieving another Obama victory, just remember the roll YOU played in that will you Hinton! (Or should I just call you Clinton).

I want Obama to lose in 1996 I mean in 2012. I seem to be the only one here that does besides Jake.

Posted by: CnR on September 20, 2010 01:00 PM
7. Well Clinton, I mean Hinton, I guess we all have to get practicing then don't we!

Macarena

When I dance they call me Macarena
And the boys they say que soy buena
They all want me, they can't have me
So they all come and dance beside me
Move with me, chat with me
And if I could I'd take you home with me

Now don't you worry about my boyfriend
The boy who's name is Vitorino
I don't want him, couldn't stand him
He was no good so I
Now come on, what was I suppose to do
He was out of town and his two friends were so fine

Come find me, my name is Macarena
Always at the party con las chicas que estan buenas
Come join me, dance with me
And all you fellas chat along with me


When I dance they call me macarena
And the boys they say that I´m buena
They all want me, they can´t have me
So they all come and dance beside me
Move with me, chat with me
And if your good i take you home with me
Dale a tu cuerpo alegria macarena
Que tu cuerpo pa' darle alegria cosabuena
Dal a tu cuerpo

Eeeh, macarena


----

Damn you Clinton Hinton, because your behavior Damns us all to another term of Obama!

Posted by: CnR on September 20, 2010 01:10 PM
8. It looks like Groundhog Day this year is going to be on Tuesday, the Second of November.

On that day we will find out if we can expect six more years of Obama.

I can only hope that Hinton doesn't see his shadow doing The Macarena.

Posted by: CnR on September 20, 2010 01:27 PM
9. Do you really, really want another term of Obama?

Is Dave Reichert that important to you?

Or do you just want history to repeat itself because you just so miss the Macarena?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ep9Pkxnsr3I

#1

Raise your right arm parallel to the ground. Your arm should be straight, palm facing down. Next, raise your left arm in the same way. Flip your right hand over so that the palm is facing up, and then do the same thing with your left hand. This constitutes the first 4 counts of the Macarena.

#2

Bring your right hand to rest on top of your left shoulder, palm facing down. Repeat this motion with your left hand and right shoulder. Move your right hand behind your head on the right side. Your palm should be touching the back of your head. Repeat this move with the left hand and left side. These motions are the second 4 counts of the Macarena.

#3

Place your right hand on the left side of your waist, palm touching your waist. Repeat this movement with your left hand and right side. Bring your right hand around to rest on the backside of your right hip. Repeat that motion with your left hand and left hip. These movements are the third 4 counts of the Macarena.

#4

Bend your knees and sway your hips for 3 counts. You should sway to the right first. On the fourth count, jump a quarter turn counter-clockwise and clap your hands at the same time. You have just completed all 16 steps of the Macarena!

#5

Repeat the dance until the song ends or until because of FOOLS LIKE YOU Obama gets Re-Elected!

Posted by: CnR on September 20, 2010 01:40 PM
10. I agree, Hinton. The time to take on the RINOs is in the primaries, not the general.

Posted by: Saltherring on September 20, 2010 02:16 PM
11. What? Did yet another troll (CnR) squeeze out of the "Horses Ass" to play merry prankster here?

Charming folks these demo-marxists.

Posted by: Attila on September 20, 2010 06:30 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?