The 14 co-sponsors of I-1053, the "Save The 2/3's Vote For Tax Increases Initiative" just released this statement this afternoon:
Voters have approved the 2/3's vote requirement for tax increases 3 times, in 1993, 1998, and just recently in 2007. Voters keep approving a law that requires either 2/3's of the politicians or a majority vote of the people for taxes to be increased. They want tax increases to be an absolute last resort.
Today, without hesitation, the Democrats in Olympia voted to violate that voter-approved law.
But the drafters of I-960 recognized that Democrats would try to circumvent this law so we required much more transparency and more information to be provided to voters. Nonetheless, Democrats tried to sidestep those rules by exempting themselves from it with Senate Bill 6843.
Heroically, the Republicans in the senate today (especially Senators Don Benton, Pam Roach, Janea Holmquist, Mike Hewitt, and Joe Zarelli) offered a slew of amendments to force floor votes on these individual sunshine provisions. Senator Benton had 15 amendments lined up with his colleagues ready to speak on each one. Realizing how indefensible their positions were on these transparency requirements, the Democrats dropped their suspension of I-960's sunshine provisions. The people and the press will continue to receive the same information they've been getting for the last two years under I-960: how much do these tax and fee increase bills cost the taxpayers, who are the legislators sponsoring them, when are the hearings, and how legislators are voting on them.
There's no justification for legislators' voting records to be kept secret from the public. If Democrats jack up a tax and then slap an emergency clause on it, preventing the people's right to referendum, the citizens have the right, under I-960, to be told how legislators voted on the 'emergency' tax increase and express their opinion on the tax increase. Democrats shouldn't be raising taxes and they shouldn't be using emergency clauses to make their tax increases "referendum-proof" -- both of which screw over the taxpayers.
But with the Democrats vote today, taxpayers are still gonna get screwed, but we at least get to find out who screwed us and by how much.
The last thing struggling taxpayers and our state's fragile economy can withstand is higher taxes, especially now during these tough economic times. Citizens have a right to expect Governor Gregoire to be held to her September, 2008 gubernatorial promise: Gregoire later pledged not to raise taxes, her strongest statement so far on her outlook for taxes in the next budget. "I won't raise taxes in tough economic times," Gregoire said. "We're not going to be raising taxes."
Today, the Democrats in Olympia voted to eliminate the 2/3's vote requirement for raising taxes, making it easier to take more of the people's money. It's not what the voters wanted, it's not what newspaper editorial boards wanted, and it's not what is needed -- no government can tax itself out of a recession.
Regards, Our Expanded Team of co-sponsors for I-1053, the "Save The 2/3's Vote For Tax Increases Initiative": Tim Eyman, Jack Fagan, Mike Fagan, Mike Dunmire, Senator Don Benton, Senator Janea Holmquist, Erma Turner, Nancy Nelson, Dagny Lord, Keli Carender, Senator Pam Roach, Rep. Matt Shea, John Ahern & Ken Morse, ph: 425-493-9127, email: tim_eyman@comcast.net, http://www.VotersWantMoreChoices.com
Posted by Tim Eyman at February 09, 2010 03:41 PM | Email ThisJust once I wish folks on this (or the other side) would be CONSISTENT and not so blatantly HYPOCRITICAL.
Posted by: Consistency on February 9, 2010 04:28 PMYou know that's false. Every time the legislature passes a bill, they change the law; they don't violate it. Either you don't understand this distinction, or you think the voters are too stupid to understand it.
"no government can tax itself out of a recession"
Duh. No government claims it can tax itself out of a recession. Also, no government can deficit-spend its way out of debt. No one can eat oneself out of obesity. No one can platitude oneself out of idiocy. Etc.
Posted by: Bruce on February 9, 2010 05:50 PMI guess the pedophile rapist didn't violate your daughter, he merely changed her to a non-virgin status.
Posted by: Seabecker on February 9, 2010 06:50 PMWRT to the 26 Senators who vote ''Yes'' on 2ESB 6843 on 3rd Reading & Final Passage:
FIRE - THEM - ALL !!
SIDEBAR: Credit where due dept:
Note that among the 23 Senators who voted NO on 6843:
In addition to all (R)s there were FIVE (D)s:
My favorite (D) Sen. Tim Sheldon was joined by (D) Senators Hobbs, Kauffman, Kilmer, and Marr.
Now:
Leaving aside Sen. Sheldon, I have no idea how many if any of the other 4 (D)s who joined him might have been given a pass by the (D) leaders to vote against to help them politically in their districts, once they were sure of getting a majority.
All I can say is that if just TWO more (D)s would have stood with the clearly expressed will of we the citizens, this travesty would have died.
I say again, regarding those who voted in YES on 6843: FIRE - THEM - ALL.
Posted by: Methow Ken on February 9, 2010 07:11 PM2/3's is the law, they are not following it, they are not abiding by it, they are violating it.
Posted by: Tim Eyman on February 9, 2010 07:31 PMIf you don't want the legislature changing your sandbox as they're legally allowed to--LEGALLY allowed to, as our government here in WA also has a representative component--I dare you to do an initiative even if it's potentially unconstitutional to stop them doing what they're about to--and again, are EMPOWERED to do--in the future.
If you believe in it, I dare you to stand by it and put THAT before voters. Not in a court of law, but in an initiative.
Posted by: Joe Szilagyi on February 10, 2010 07:45 AMThat's only because the Democrat caucus let them vote no. They were in vulnerable districts and didn't need their votes. If they needed them to pass, you can bet their vote would have changed. Happens on every level of government. Don't be fooled by those Democrats votes.
Posted by: Palouse on February 10, 2010 10:20 AMDon't be fooled voters!
Posted by: Reality on February 10, 2010 11:42 AMHaving said the above, I believe Sen. Sheldon is still the exception. He continues to be my favorite (D); for all the times he has stood with the minority (R)s on important issues.
Posted by: Methow Ken on February 10, 2010 01:27 PM