July 16, 2009
Friday Tell Congress you don't want health care taken over by government

Tell Congress in person. Join your neighbors and go to your Congressman's or Senator's office with a letter or a sign - 9:00 to 10:00 AM

Government-run health care is the only issue in this Tea Party demonstration.

Washington State Tea Party Movement: Here are the Puget Sound locations:

Bellevue

Sen. Patty Murray 1611 116th Ave. NE, Ste. 214 Bellevue, WA 98004

Bellingham

Rep. Rick Larsen 104 W. Magnolia, Suite 206 Bellingham, WA 98225

Bremerton

Rep. Norm Dicks 345 6th Street, Suite 500 Bremerton, WA 98337

Everett

Sen. Maria Cantwell 2930 Wetmore Avenue, Suite 9B Everett, WA 98201

Sen. Patty Murray 2930 Wetmore Avenue, Ste. 903
Everett, Washington 98201

Rep. Rick Larsen 2930 Wetmore Ave., Suite 9F
Everett, WA 98201

Olympia

Rep. Brian Baird 120 Union Avenue, Suite 105
Olympia, WA 98501

Poulsbo

Rep. Jay Inslee 17791 Fjord Dr., NE Door 112
Poulsbo, WA 98370-8481

Seattle

Sen. Maria Cantwell 915 Second Avenue, Suite 3206
Seattle, WA 98174

Rep. Jim McDermott 1809 7th Avenue, Suite 1212
Seattle, WA 98101-1399

Sen. Patty Murray 915 2nd Avenue, Suite 2988
Seattle, Washington 98174

Rep. Dave Reichert 1809 7th Avenue, Suite 1212
Seattle, WA 98101-1399

Shoreline

Rep. Jay Inslee 18560 1st Ave NE, Suite E800
Shoreline, WA 98155

Tacoma

Sen. Maria Cantwell 950 Pacific Avenue, Suite 615 Tacoma, WA 98402

Rep. Norm Dicks 1019 Pacific Ave. Suite 806
Tacoma, WA 98402

Sen. Patty Murray 950 Pacific Avenue, Ste. 650
Tacoma, Washington 98402

Rep. Adam Smith 3600 Port of Tacoma Road, Suite 106
Tacoma, Washington 98424

See the Washington Tea Party Movement site for their Tea Party guidelines.

Posted by Ron Hebron at July 16, 2009 07:29 AM | Email This
Comments
1. And please express your concern about UW's leftist book program. For several years UW has taken your money to buy thousands of copies of 'common books' -- all from the far left -- for the mass indoctrination of the freshman masses.

Kirby Wilbur this morning said that all the common books except the first (a bio of physician Paul Farmer) are ideological propaganda. In fact the Paul Farmer book is a Marxist anthem. Mountains Beyond Mountains, mostly about Dr. Farmer's good work in Haiti, is wholly about leftist radicalism: Farmer's inspiration is Castro's Cuba and, according to Dori Monson, Farmer's sugar daddy is George Soros.

Posted by: liberal empathy on July 16, 2009 08:06 AM
2. down w/ tricare. down w/ the military, down w/ medicare and medicaid, forget the poor, selfishness is king!

Posted by: mike on July 16, 2009 08:16 AM
3. You don't have to attend, mike.

Posted by: Gary on July 16, 2009 08:26 AM
4. Aw cmon Gary, he could be the comic entertainment troll.

Posted by: Mike336 on July 16, 2009 08:37 AM
5. #4 Yeah! He can be the guy on the other side of the street with a sign that reads "down with shift keys (except for the "!")!"

Posted by: Gary on July 16, 2009 08:46 AM
6. I dunno -- asking a handful of teabaggers to decide which of a dozen possible places to show up at probably isn't the best way to demonstrate the awesome numbers behind your movement.

But thanks for the heads-up, Ron. I don't think I'll be able to make it to any of the protests. But I'll definitely have time to write a quick email to my congresspeople reminding them that it's highly unlikely that any of the teabaggers voted to put them into office, and just as unlikely that wavering on health care reform will get them any new votes next time.

Posted by: scottd on July 16, 2009 09:23 AM
7. mike @ #2: It's not about putting down anything. It's about standing up for freedom and liberty. The famous Ben Franklin quote concerning trading liberty for safety applies here as well. Not all desires for safety have to do with someone trying to attack us from without. The desire for safety from the ills of within will erode our liberty just as surely.

Posted by: Geoff on July 16, 2009 09:36 AM
8. scottd, don't worry. You have the White House. You have the House. You have 60 votes in the Senate. So no problem, right?

Posted by: Gary on July 16, 2009 09:59 AM
9. Scott D, yeah, you have a point. We should tell that same thing to Reichert every time he screws us on energy when the libs slam his email.

Posted by: PC on July 16, 2009 10:10 AM
10. Sounds about right, Gary. :-)

Posted by: scottd on July 16, 2009 10:15 AM
11. I already emailed Murray. I acknowledged that I hung up on her yesterday when she called to invite me to participate in her 'phone town hall'. I told her that sadly I have learned from my own experience and from her own wordS that she is more interested in obeying her party demands than hearing the concerns and desires of her constituents. I told her 4 voters in our household want the reckless spending ended and for congress to actually read the bills before they cavalierly spend our hard earned money. I told her that speaking for all 4 of us NO ON CAP AND TAX and HELL NO ON SOCIALIZED, NATIONALIZED (and PREDICTABLY RATIONED) HEALTH "CARE".

I sent similar messages to Cantwell and that faux conservative/traitor Reichert.

I suggest YOU do the same.

The 'poll numbers" are falling for all this crap. If they are falling this dramatically during summer when typically no one pays attention to the machinations of government, how much do you suppose they'll fall when folks finally start paying attention? Why do you suppose those deceptive, rotten democraps are pushing all this crap through with no "transparency" and their claim of "urgency"?

CALL.
WRITE.

Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold on July 16, 2009 10:40 AM
12. scottd is disappointed because there are more blue-dog Democrats then he ever cared to admit. Rick Larsen is not buying this single-payer crap. Watch for the ultra left-wing to target his seat next year.

Posted by: Crusader on July 16, 2009 10:45 AM
13. Interesting how liberal pro-tax anti-protest contributors above seem to know so much about 'teabagging' such that they use it as a pejorative to describe the TEA movement. Kinda disgusting that they like it so much.

Back on topic, sort of - anyone else disturbed that these representatives have SO many offices, with all their staffs and expenses? The only advantage I see is that it makes it more convenient to protest the destruction of our quality health care.

Posted by: yaddacubed on July 16, 2009 10:57 AM
14. BTW, according to news sources Obamacare is not going to even get out of House committee. It's DOA.

Posted by: Crusader on July 16, 2009 11:09 AM
15. #2: Mike, are YOU going to be subjected to the "surtax" to pay for this? Or are you actually saying that you are calling OTHER people who you expect to pay for your rationed medicine "selfish" for not paying for you? Are you really that self-centered?

Posted by: Michele on July 16, 2009 11:17 AM
16. Michele, isn't it interesting that the people trying to take our money call *us* selfish, when we are not asking for any of theirs?

They turn every word upside-down, including "right" and "freedom".

CBO is dumping on this turd now.

Posted by: Gary on July 16, 2009 11:31 AM
17. Instead of picketing the losers in Congress, go visit your local 55+ adult community and chat with them about the Democrats plan to replace Medicare with a system that will prematurely kill millions of elderly people with rationing.

This bill is vile. You have to be a hateful, evil person to support this awful plan. You fascists want to enslave me in a terrible system & kill the economy, yet I am the one who is being selfish? No, it is you that is selfish. Keep your laws off of my body, pro-choice, abolsih slavery (all slavery, including govt. deathcare systems and socialism).

Posted by: AP on July 16, 2009 11:35 AM
18. Well, well, well. Our suspicions have been confirmed. Obamacare WILL outlaw private insurance. DOGS!! I'm going to do a short public blog post on it.

Posted by: Michele on July 16, 2009 11:56 AM
19. I'm sorry, I wasn't clear enough.

LYING dogs!

Posted by: Michele on July 16, 2009 12:01 PM
20. Anyone who thinks the cost of this plan will really be paid for by "sticking it to the rich" has got to be pretty uneducated.

This is part of the battle plan of the left on those who produce, and like every battle plan they come up with, they have failed to realize that the other side has a vote and can counterattack or simply retreat.

There are tax havens all over the world that will gladly take the richest off our hands, and plenty will do it. (Don't think it will happen? Then you are naive as it happens already.) It doesn't take many of these ultra-high income people moving out to greatly damage the revenue projections.

Other, less prosperous but still wealthy individuals will develop new tax plans, move less of their investments into hard assets such as real estate, or simply retire, and that will also radically reduce the expected government income the dems plan to get from taxing the rich.

The net effect will be a massive revenue shortfall, and guess who gets to pick up the tab then?

Hint: it won't be the poor who don't pay taxes.

It also won't be businesses as the Pelosi congress plans other new taxes and regulations for them that will already keep them on the very edge of financial ruin.

That leaves only the middle class, and they will get hit hard.

They will saddle the middle class taxpayer with tons of new taxes and a healthcare system that will be overloaded and not nearly as responsive or innovative as what we've been paying for.

This so "48 million uninsured" - of which 10 to 12 million are illegal immigrants and millions of others are drug using undisciplined and unmotivated losers who've been trained by our public schools that productive "owe" them a good living. Don't have to go to their own countries or get a real job.

We're all about to get royally screwed. Thanks a lot Obama.

Posted by: johnny on July 16, 2009 01:11 PM
21. Ron, could you run an update to this post and let people know that the protests will happen at 9:00 am Friday for one hour? I didn't see it mentioned in your post. Thanks.

Posted by: Michele on July 16, 2009 01:15 PM
22. #20. "The net effect will be a massive revenue shortfall, and guess who gets to pick up the tab then?"

-
Exactly right. But the President does not care about that. Remember when Tim Russert asked him during a debate about how raising the Cap Gains tax would actually cause a *decrease* in revenue? Remember what Obama's response was? He said that it didn't matter... what mattered was "fairness". He will stick it to "the rich" regardless of the impact to the budget, and the poor will suffer for it.

So, not only will the govt *not* get the increase, but they will lose what they were already getting because people aren't stupid. Behaviors change.

When you tax a person 30%, you get 30%. When you tax 'em 100%, you get 0%.

Posted by: Gary on July 16, 2009 01:19 PM
23. Here's more food for thought: The Seattle Times reported yesterday that one of the funding mechanisms for this travesty would be that "Medicare and Medicaid payments to medical providers would be slowed." What the honk??? and this is supposed to motivate doctors HOW? How about "slowing" payments to congresspeople to fund this travesty? Didn't see that option listed, yet they want others to pay for it.

Also, this stealth little detail about the 1-5.4% "surtax" on "the rich" appear in same Times story: "The additional tax on high-income people COULD RISE SIGNIFICANTLY IN 2013 IF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DID NOT ACHIEVE SPECIFIED SAVINGS IN FEDERAL HEALTH PROGRAMS SUCH AS MEDICARE AND MEDICAID". (my caps)

Anyone here REALLY think the gov. will achieve any meaningful savings in these areas and NOT raise this evil tax? Yah, no hands going up on that one.

Posted by: Michele on July 16, 2009 01:29 PM
24. I'm so disgusted with Dave Reichert for voting for cap and tax, I'm not going to waste my time or my vote on him any more. And Cantwell and Murray were lost causes a long time ago.

Posted by: Palouse on July 16, 2009 01:33 PM
25. Now, now... don't you all know that the United States must keep spending money to avoid going bankrupt?

Joe Biden said so.

Just think of how un-bankrupt we'll be at the rates they're spending.

But hey, they can manage our health care and control the Earth's climate, so who am I to question Authority?

Posted by: Gary on July 16, 2009 02:53 PM
26. gary,

selfish: concerned chiefly or only with yourself and your advantage to the exclusion of others

i think that describes a majority of conservatives these days.

Posted by: mike on July 16, 2009 03:01 PM
27. mike,

Buttinsky: Concerned mainly with sticking one's nose into other people's business.

I think that describes the majority of liberals these days.

Posted by: Gary on July 16, 2009 03:05 PM
28. truth must really hurt, eh?

Posted by: mike on July 16, 2009 03:15 PM
29. Good one, mike. Real zinger.

Anyway, again, you are not required to attend ay of the rallies.

So...?

Posted by: Gary on July 16, 2009 03:17 PM
30. selfish: concerned chiefly or only with yourself and your advantage to the exclusion of others

Interesting. In this thread we're told that it is irresponsible of us if we don't subsidize your healthcare, and on this thread we are told straight-up that we don't even count. And we're supposedly the selfish ones?

Screw you!

Posted by: Alphabet Soup on July 16, 2009 05:04 PM
31. first, it wasn't a comeback.

second, it's "our" healthcare, not mine, not yours. this is why your thinking is so skewed. it's not your country, it's not my country, it's ours.

i've got more important things to do than go to rallies infested w/ bigots, racists and traitors. remember all the whining when repubs were in power and blew it? "you don't like it here, you can always leave?" (although usu. a lot more swearing) maybe conservatives should stop being selfish dimwits or follow their own advice.

i think what duffman meant to say is that you (republicans) are irrelevant, not that you don't count.

Posted by: mike on July 16, 2009 05:45 PM
32. Are you guys sure that Mike isn't in fact Rizzo (that liberal twerp John Jensen who advertises that he wants to murder conservatives) but lacks the nerve to try it?

Same idiotic snarky nonsensical arrogance and empty brained crap.

You would think that unscrupulous Democrats who fu*k over their own constituents had never been elected before.
Liars lie to everyone (not just thier enemies) mike/Rizzo, didn't you know that?
Watch how Obama hoses the likes of Rizzo/Mike when the tide turns (soon).

Liberal duplicity - the gift that keeps on giving.
Endlessly entertaining.

Posted by: Amused by Liberals on July 16, 2009 06:09 PM
33. No, it's your healthcare dipshit. I take care of mine - you want me to help take care of yours.

i've got more important things to do than go to rallies infested w/ bigots, racists and traitors.

Fine, then don't go to any lefty rallies. Instead go to a T.E.A. party rally where people of all ideological, sociological, and cultural stripe gather to voice their concerns.

Or don't - I'd prefer you not stink up the place...

Posted by: Alphabet Soup on July 16, 2009 06:28 PM
34. actually, i don't want you to take care of mine. i pay for my own as well. see, i'm taking responsibility for myself and others.

i'm just not selfish enough to think that the world revolves around me, that we need to provide health care for all americans (not insurance). to think that the richest coutry in the world can't afford it is selfish and absurd. there are things we need to do as a country to secure life - that right you guys keep talking about.

people of all ideological, sociological, and cultural stripe gather to voice their concerns.

riight. only they aren't voicing conerns, as much as they are denigrating minorities and shouting lies. and since when are libertarian-leaning white folks not considered homogenous?

Posted by: mike on July 16, 2009 06:44 PM
35. Hey Mike/rizzo, i'm traking care of myslef too and and others too an i'm just not so slfish to only thinks the werld revolves around me so comne over to my hous and take whzat you like cuz since when are libertarian-leaning white folk consifered homgenous?

Are you what you said or not?

Juast assking

Posted by: Amused by Kind Hearted Liberals on July 16, 2009 08:49 PM
36. Health Rations and You

Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold on July 16, 2009 08:56 PM
37. ragnar:

insurance companies making health care cost prohibitive to patients w/ pre-existing conditions is rationing health care.

insurance companies denying health care to patients w/ pre-existing conditions is rationing health care.

insurance companies denying health care to those with insurance is rationing health care.

insurance companies coming between doctors and patients is rationing health care.

tens of millions of uninsured, underinsured, and those on the verge of losing employment are rationed health care.

how you don't seem to understand this is perplexing.

btwm this notion that poor people can just go get help at the emergency room is so false it's ridiculous. poor people tend to wait to get help, and the longer they wait, the costlier that is. who do the costs get passed to? anyone? buehler?

Posted by: mike on July 16, 2009 09:12 PM
38. No it isn't.

Posted by: Alphabet Soup on July 16, 2009 09:24 PM
39. Mike/Rizzo,

Ragnar's fine.
What is perplexing you is your own rank stupidity.
Amusing for me though.

Thanks

Posted by: Amused by liberals on July 16, 2009 09:26 PM
40. Why are people listing Dave Reichert's Seattle address, when his web site lists his district office as the one on Mercer Island? I figure I should go to the Mercer Island office, because if that is the address that his web site lists, that's where he intends to receive constituent concerns. Can someone tell me why the Seattle address is listed? Thank you.

Posted by: engineer lady on July 16, 2009 09:27 PM
41. Oh wait - I get it!

"Short people who can't ring the bell for service is rationing health care."

"One legged hermaphrodites who miss the bus is rationing health care."

Wow, I never knew!

Posted by: Alphabet Soup on July 16, 2009 09:33 PM
42. i'm the stupid one? that's a good one, folks! likewise, your absurdist positions are equally comical.

actually, alphabet, it is. it is in the same sense that you wingnuts have been projecting your unfounded fears on single payer.

Posted by: mike on July 16, 2009 09:39 PM
43. Since the same address is listed for Bagdad Jim, & I think that even a RINO wouldn't share the exact same office with him, I think the Seattle address could be wrong. Reichert's site lists 2737 78th Ave SE #202 Mercer Island, as does Google maps.

Posted by: engineering lady on July 16, 2009 09:40 PM
44. Yeah Soup,

Don't tell Mike/rizzo he's the stupid one (that he knows of).
BTW Did you tell him that?
He said our "absurdist" positions are equally comical. Is that a word?
Also, I don't do bullshit liberal-speak (lying double-talk) well; is it possible that we should feeeel complimented?


Posted by: Amused by liberals on July 16, 2009 09:58 PM
45. Well I'm feeeeeeling that his absurdable ad-homilies are deeply nasturtium...

Posted by: Alphabet Soup on July 16, 2009 10:44 PM
46. first you nuts think i'm mikebs, now i'm rizzo. interestingly enough, i'm neither. i'm just mike.

and absurdist is a word, but you are correct: i meant to write absurd positions

is bullshit liberal speak similar to selfish- me-first, screw the poor, facts don't matter, dbag "family values" hypocrite speak?

Posted by: mike on July 16, 2009 10:47 PM
47. It is interesting how liberals assert that simply expecting to keep my own property can be considered "selfish."

This individual freedom thing really gets to "liberals" these days. Actually most of these liberal morons call themselves "progressives" now to avoid the stigma of having surrendered their liberty for the cheap illusion of security. It's like street punks working up the courage to rob a "rich" neighbor. Yeah, he's selfish, me first, screw the poor, facts don't matter, lets show that bastard."

The reason it gets to them is because they know that at the heart of the debate is the freedom of every individual American. Progressives believe that they must shame us out of our god-given inalienable rights with emotional appeals of moral superiority of "generosity" and "selflessness," or their health care program may not be out into effect, and their partisan victory will be thwarted. They care more about vindicating their fantasy than anyone's individual freedom.

These phony liberal/progressives willingly ignore the fact that just as their is no liberty or progress offered by their liberal/progressivism, there is no generosity or selflessness in surrendering precious individual rights to a government. To the contrary. They don't care that supposed "facts" and statistics about our health care system are utterly irrelevant when compared to the loss of individual freedom to choose for ones' self. Neither do they care that most of us have already made certain that a safety net already exists whereby we very much care for our neighbors and as individuals, Americans are the most selfless and generous people on earth.

When these phony liberal/progressives repeat over and over that those who disagree with their utterly stupid surrender of individual rights are "selfish- me-first, screw the poor, facts don't matter," they are only proving that they completely lost the debate.

My insistence upon defending my right to keep my own property free from seizure by phony liberal/progressive punks like Mike/Rizzo and his ilk is self respect. I refuse to surrender my freedom for petty false appeals to moral superiority especially by those whose moral bankruptcy has created the problem.
Huge numbers of people like me are quietly and inexorably preparing to resist their efforts to seize our freedoms by whatever means.

BTW, looked around again yesterday. All of the sports stores stocks of ammo and hardware are nearly bought out. Back orders are seemingly endless. Hussein Obama is the greatest firearms salesman in the history of the world.

Wonder why?

Posted by: Amused by liberals on July 17, 2009 08:00 AM
48. and absurdist is a word, but you are correct

Disambiguate much?

is bullshit liberal speak similar to selfish- me-first, screw the poor, facts don't matter, dbag "family values" hypocrite speak?

Apparently to someone to whom words are relative and fluid things. To normal people, no.

Posted by: Alphabet Soup on July 17, 2009 10:16 AM
49. Separate the relatively few legitimately "uninsured" from the uninsured illegals and the uninsured by choice and the filter THEM through the VA system for well care, healthcare and Rx's.

Problem solved.

And the rest of us can be left alone from lying democraps and an intrusive government

Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold on July 17, 2009 10:59 AM
50. AND, in the same vein, offer the legitmately homeless 'homes' on defunct military bases and make them responsible for its maintenance and for growing/raising their own food.

Another problem solved.

Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold on July 17, 2009 11:02 AM
51. At #50,
"offer the legitmately homeless 'homes' on defunct military bases and make them responsible for its maintenance and for growing/raising their own food."

Do that and every addle-brained butt licking Rizzo (John Jensen who advertises that he wants to murder conservatives) freebee moron type in the wood work will dee-cide they dee-serve a free house too.

Then pretty soon just like this health care nonsense, every addle-brained butt licking Rizzo (John Jensen who advertises that he wants to murder conservatives) freebee moron type in the wood work would dee-cide they dee-serve a nice big new house with a pool on the government, and yours shore looks good to him.

Its next on their hit parade, "housing reform," only without the silly formality of FNMA OR FDMAC and mortgages.

Sorry Ragnar, with all due respect, this would only be . . . another problem created.

Posted by: Amused by liberals on July 17, 2009 04:27 PM
52. I put up with 8 years of drunken wild spending by the Republicans, so I am amused at your outrage now. Where we all your protest then!

Posted by: stella on July 18, 2009 05:28 AM
53. Shut up stella.

Posted by: Alphabet Soup on July 19, 2009 08:28 AM
54. "I put up with 8 years of drunken wild spending by the Republicans . . ."

Lie. 8 years of it never happened.

". . . so I am amused at your outrage now."

Unwittingly amused by your own imbecility

"Where we all your protest then! "

Many of "we all" protested overspending by the Democrat Congress in the latter Bush term. Where were you genius!

Posted by: Amused by Liberal Pretence on July 21, 2009 12:29 PM
55. My party was good for first time
http://www.filthfilms.com/movies/fetish-gallery/index42.html was beautiful

Posted by: !!!!promcyprord on July 22, 2009 12:13 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?