Here's the story, in brief.
Seattle Public Schools' choice of new high-school math textbooks has been challenged by three people who say the books' approach is failing many students.
The Seattle School Board recently approved the purchase of three books published by Key Curriculum Press: "Discovering Algebra," "Discovering Geometry" and "Discovering Advanced Algebra."
The vote was 4-3, with three board members expressing concern about whether the books were too heavily weighted toward one side of the often-contentious debate over how best to teach math.
The appeal was filed in King County Superior Court by parent DaZanne Porter, retired math teacher Martha McLaren and Cliff Mass, University of Washington professor of atmospheric science.
(I hope to get more information for you on the appeal, and other possible moves, directly from the source.)
Since I am not a lawyer, I will not try to guess whether this appeal will succeed. But I will add that the school board may change its mind after the next election, especially since one of those in the majority, Cheryl Chow, is not running for re-election.
(If you want some background on the controversy, you might want to start with Professor Mass's op-ed.)
Posted by Jim Miller at June 22, 2009 09:28 AM | Email ThisA cross-examination of a school board member by a non-innumerate lawyer would be a glorious highlight.
Please keep us quivering citizens up to date on Court proceedings.
Posted by: Insufficiently Sensitive on June 22, 2009 01:28 PMThat doctrine btw is perhaps THE major limitation on power of judges....they only can decide a real case brought by someone with a real stake in it, they can't just roam around and decide anything.
So, Insufficiently Sensitive, and others, I ask you to join in hoping the judge throws out this suit right away.
(Btw I personally support old math ... I do believe Pythagoras would, too, and that's really old math! Canyou imagine a shop class asking kids to invent a table saw, or fire? A history class asking students to research and write their own textbook? The store of learning has great value.)
In other words, Mass' position in this suit is that something that on its face isn't racist, can be shown to be racist if it produces differential results.
Just like the city of New Haven in the fire fighters case!
So now I am triply sure all conservatives will join in decrying this lawsuit as being frivolous and a typical example of lawsuit abuse.
that is, the principled ones.
Posted by: Yup Torture Lawyer again on June 22, 2009 07:28 PMwhile i sympathize with both, i wonder what Barry Goldwater would say?
Posted by: righton on June 22, 2009 07:48 PM