President Obama needs a Commerce Secretary nominee who is so clean that he will sail through the vetting process. So Gary Locke...
Gary Locke? I sometimes ride my bicycle past the Buddhist temple in Redmond where he raised illegal campaign contributions. Oh, is alleged to have. Michelle Malkin has a better memory than I because she was here on the Seattle Times' editorial board and dug in Locke's dirt and published columns on his shady practices.
Now, former Democrat Gov. Gary Locke -- a lawyer for international firm Davis, Wright, and Tremaine who specializes in China -- is rumored to be the next nominee for the post. The MSM is pulling for him. WaPo writes: "Locke is regarded as a safe choice by senior officials in the Obama administration given his long history in public life, his strait-laced reputation and his bipartisan governing credentials." Wishful thinking? Willful cluelessness? Probably a bit of both.She quotes her columns investigating his shady practices at length. For example in the Seattle Times in 1999:I covered Gary Locke when I worked at the Seattle Times. I dealt with his campaign and gubernatorial staffs. "Strait-laced" is not the adjective I'd use for my dealings with him and his people.
In response to my columns pressing Locke on his close ties to campaign finance crook John Huang, the governor's office first stonewalled. His standard Democrat smokescreen? Play the race card and play the victim.
When I asked what the governor had to say about Huang's guilty plea, Locke's spokesman, Keith Love, responded tersely: "He has no comment and no interest."And the Seattle Times in 1998This is a most peculiar stonewall of silence.
Though Huang and his wife gave token personal donations to Locke totaling a mere $1,000, Huang is no casual acquaintance of Locke or his out-of-state fund-raising staff. As reported here previously, Huang helped organize May 1996 galas involving Locke at the Mayflower Hotel and Sheraton Carlton in Washington, D.C.; three fund-raisers at restaurants in Los Angeles, and an extravaganza at the Universal City, Calif., Hilton in October 1996 that raised upwards of $30,000.
Gov. Gary Locke's 1996 campaign treasure chest is like a box of chocolates left out in the sun: You never know what kind of sticky mess you're gonna get.I sure wish she was still here. Her "replacement" never provided her independent view and determination.News broke over the weekend that the Internal Revenue Service wants to examine Locke's donor list. That's in addition to a fresh congressional inquiry and three separate probes by the state Public Disclosure Commission (two prompted by this column).
Locke's loyalists imply that scrutiny of his contributors is racist. The claim is as desperate as it is deceitful...
Cross-posted at Economic Freedom - my own blog.
Posted by Ron Hebron at February 24, 2009 07:56 AM | Email ThisI'd be real surprised if he gets the nod; except, OTOH, Obama was a real shyster himself with some of his overseas contributions. This may not affect his decision.
Oh, after reading Michelle's article, Locke claimed racial bias. Hard to correlate that with Michelle though.
Posted by: swatter on February 24, 2009 08:01 AMKind of funny and also pathetic.
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTAyYTk1NWVlOThhZDUyMGU1YTJhYTNjOTNlYzU2MTU=
Posted by: swatter on February 24, 2009 08:29 AMPlease consider adding Conservative Oasis to your blogroll... The site is at http://conservativeoasis.com
I am a Washington State Blogger- and I do hit WA State issues from time to time, but mostly deal with national and international topics.
Much thanks for your consideration. Please email me one way or the other, so I can be sure you got this message???
Posted by: Conservative Oasis on February 24, 2009 12:44 PMPlease consider adding Conservative Oasis to your blogroll... The site is at http://conservativeoasis.com
I am a Washington State Blogger- and I do hit WA State issues from time to time, but mostly deal with national and international topics.
Much thanks for your consideration. Please email me one way or the other, so I can be sure you got this message???
Posted by: Conservative Oasis on February 24, 2009 12:45 PMhttp://tinyurl.com/d8whou
Ouch.
Posted by: Huey on February 24, 2009 12:59 PMI appreciate Malkin's skills as a writer and a polemicist, but her skills as an investigative journalist cannot overcome her lack of objectivity. Which is perhaps why she is not an investigative journalist and is instead a right-wing blogger. A smart and talented right-wing blogger, mind you.
Posted by: Todd on February 24, 2009 10:27 PM
Really? Then why does a partner at the law firm disagree with you?
Contact: Mr. Bruce Johnson
Title: Partner
Description: With more than 400 attorneys involved in virtually every specialty area of the law, Davis Wright Tremaine represents a single, powerful industry-focused resource for dealing with the host of interrelated legal issues businesses face today. Specialties areas include, but are not limited to, admiralty & maritime, aircraft industry, antitrust, China/Shanghai, construction, education, environmental, financial services, healthcare, IT, IP, international law, mergers & acquisitions and tax.
They are also regularly referred to in newspapers and magazines as "specializing in China", so we await your mea culpa.
Posted by: Rick D. on February 25, 2009 05:38 AM