February 22, 2009
About Those Newspapers

Point:

Counterpoint, from page 396-7 of this book:

Like other newspapers of the 1790s, Freneau's National Gazette did not feign neutrality. With the population widely dispersed, newspapers were unabashedly partisan organs that supplied much of the adhesive power binding the incipient parties together. Americans were a literate people, and dozens of newspapers flourished. The country probably had more newspapers per capita than any other. A typical issue had four long sheets, crammed with essays and small advertisements but no drawings or illustrations. These papers tended to be short on facts - there was little "spot news" reporting - and long on opinion. The more closely resembled journals of opinion than daily newspapers. Often scurrilous and inaccurate, they had few qualms about hinting that a certain nameless official was embezzling money or colluding with a foreign power. "Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper," Jefferson later said. "Truth itself becomes suspicious be being put into that polluted vehicle." No code of conduct circumscribed responsible press behavior. [emphasis added]
Posted by Eric Earling at February 22, 2009 12:28 PM | Email This
Comments
1. The point Horsey is trying to make is idiotic. Yes, newspapers are dying, but NEWS is certainly not dying. I don't think Jefferson would care if the "press" was literally printed on paper or if were sent with digitial signals.

You cannot credibly argue that people don't have a LOT more access to news and information then they did a couple hundred years ago, or even a decade ago.

When their actual access to news starts to dissipate, then I'll worry. Before then, I think I'll take it easy.

Posted by: cliff on February 22, 2009 12:38 PM
2. Cliff nails it.

We have not had newspapers for a long time--30-40 years?

But we have news, and lots of it--good news (all senses of that word including especially "high quality") and plenty of it.

Took me a while to turn of the radio and the TV so I could se it, but it has been there for a while.

Posted by: Larry Sheldon on February 22, 2009 01:29 PM
3. "These papers tended to be short on facts - there was little 'spot news' reporting - and long on opinion."

Sounds like today's Pravda-Izvestia (P-I). Horsey should be proud.

Posted by: Saltherring on February 22, 2009 02:32 PM
4. Yesterday, the editor of the Columbian tried the same stunt, leaving out this little tidbit.

http://columbiancomments.blogspot.com/2009/02/major-update-feb-21-press-talk-former.html

Posted by: Hinton on February 22, 2009 02:44 PM
5. I wonder if this means Horsey supports getting rid of the Obama Administration and the Pelosi-and-Reid led Congress? All in the name of Thomas Jefferson, of course!

Posted by: Shanghai Dan on February 22, 2009 02:53 PM
6. I think my Fav recent response to an email to a local newspaper reporter suggesting a story was "This must Be Spam and Will Be Treated as Such". That was sent by the special 10 finger spam filter.

This outdid all the responses to my emails about the constant references to the I-695 as the excuse for 'funding problems' before the current 'budget crisis' killed the I-695 scapegoat. (I-695 never became law but was touted as just as worst as requiring abortionists to stop their trade)

Homerun by Cliff

Posted by: Col. Hogan on February 22, 2009 03:49 PM
7. Are we doing a rerun? Either I am imagining things or there was a post about this Horsey cartoon a while ago when PI announced that it was closing its doors.

Posted by: DopioLover on February 22, 2009 11:58 PM
8. Does anyone know the exact date when P-Day will be? It should be around March 9 or so. Any update on the rumor that Kemper Freeman might buy it, or was that just joshing?

Posted by: Travis T. on February 23, 2009 07:20 AM
9. Any sympathy I ever had for Horsey's fine drawing has been long canceled by his amateur political scribblings on the editorial pages. Yesterday's took the cake - a plea that the Democrats use their ill-gotten majority in Congress to impose permanent change on this country, no doubt (he can't articulate it well enough) to impose some enviro-socialist heaven on the rest of us, with urban 'intellectuals' uber alles. Oh, and he asserts that Obama's trying to govern from the center. Talk about drinking the MSM kool-aid...

Posted by: Insufficiently Sensitive on February 23, 2009 08:48 AM
10. Horsey's
Please just draw the cute pictures and leave the serious thought to Pelotzi and Barney Frankly.

Posted by: robert odem on February 23, 2009 12:35 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?