Debt or taxes, take your pick:
The lobbyists and legislators I talked to down in Olympia yesterday indicated that there was no way out of the budget crisis--$7 billion? $8 billion--other than raising taxes.
Something tells me the hyper-pragmatist side of Frank Chopp isn't thrilled with that option. Whatever happens with Obama in DC, a major, perceived fumble by Democrats in control of Olympia could have electoral ramifications in 2010, which no doubt weighs on Chopp's mind.
Exit point: perhaps this is why government shouldn't spend through the nose when it is warned not too? Just a thought.
UPDATE: in addition to spending too much, some would like to fund such over-spending by relying on a tighter squeeze on an already declining tax base. There's your gasoline being poured on the fire of unsustainability.
Posted by Eric Earling at January 27, 2009 03:15 PM | Email ThisYou see, there is no Democrat who wants to cut any spending, so you just raise taxes.
Shouldn't there be a compromise somewhere in between like let's cut everything vs. let's cut a lot and raise taxes a little?
Posted by: swatter on January 27, 2009 03:45 PMThey is certainly true, but no more than the people in the media that defend and protect them, and the people who vote for them and their taxing and spending addiction. Democrats are happy as can be when they can just give away more and more of other peoples' money to their voters. But when the well dries up, they can't figure out how to reduce their addiction to spending by a penny?
Gregoire's biennial budget proposal was $400 million HIGHER than the last biennium, and her party in the Legislature is acting like a cabal of Meth addicts that can't strip Copper wire fast enough to support their addiction. Gregoire wants more liquor stores to suck more revenue? She already profits from vices like gambling and cigarettes. Why not just legalize drugs and make Gregoire the only legal drug dealer in the state?
How does any addict get cured of their dangerous habits? Does anyone disagree that this state's Democrats and their dependency base need an intervention? How do we cut-off Democrats and force them into withdrawals for about a decade!
Posted by: Reality on January 27, 2009 04:28 PMYou'll have to make do with what you have.
Just like I do...
Posted by: nomoretaxes on January 27, 2009 05:04 PMI hope I wasn't unclear.
Posted by: Michele on January 27, 2009 09:14 PMUntil the public sends a message that they are tired of being squeezed for more and more tax dollars, these politicians have no reason to change their behavior.
Posted by: Smoley on January 27, 2009 11:29 PMJust my thoughts.
Posted by: tc on January 28, 2009 07:45 AM