January 18, 2009
Latest Bills from Olympia, Part VII

Wherein we protect politicians from the public, the public from sex offenders, and sex offenders from art.

House Bill 1255 (regarding the business and occupation tax )
Introduced by Rep. Jim Moeller, (D-Vancouver) (D) on January 16, 2009, eliminates the option to deduct professional dues and initiation fees from the business and occupation tax.

House Bill 1264 (regarding the creation and registration of entities formed by public agencies)
Introduced by Rep. Larry Springer, (D-Kirkland) (D) on January 16, 2009, subjects government agencies to the same creation, registration and record keeping guidelines that corporations and private businesses must follow.

House Bill 1277 (protecting the public from sex offenders released into the community)
Introduced by Rep. Kirk Pearson, (R-Monroe) (R) on January 16, 2009, adds some measures and modifications of notication to the community when sex offenders are released into the community. Allows the department of corrections to reject a proposed residence for sex offenders convicted of a felony crime against a minor victim if that residence is near schools, childcare centers, playgrounds or any place frequented by children in the age range or circumstance of the victim. Requires immediate notification of the local police chief when a sex offender has been found to tamper or remove an electronic monitoring device and requires that the department notify previous victims of offenders when they are released.

House Bill 1286 (Prohibiting false and defamatory statements about candidates for public office)
Introduced by Rep. Mark Miloscia, (D-Federal Way) (D) on January 16, 2009, prohibits political advertising or electioneering communications that with actual malice make a statement constituting libel or defamation per se. "Libel or defamation per se" is defined as statements that tend to expose a person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, to deprive him or her of public confidence or social interaction, or to injure him or her in his or her business or occupation.

House Bill 1289 (concerning campaign contributions to candidates for public lands commissioner)
Introduced by Rep. Sharon Nelson, (D-West Seattle) (D) on January 16, 2009, forbids persons who sell or conduct business with the public lands commission to contribute money or gifts to a candidate for office of public lands.

Senate Bill 5217 (Concerning public expenditures for works of art)
Introduced by Sen. Michael Carrell, (R-Lakewood) (R) on January 16, 2009, prohibits the expenditure of public funds for placement of works of art in the special commitment center on McNeil Island; secure community transition facilities and other halfway houses, and facilities operated by the department of corrections.

Senate Bill 5218 (Controlling computer access by residents at the special commitment center )
Introduced by Sen. Michael Carrell, (R-Lakewood) (R) on January 16, 2009, prohibits a resident of the special commitment center and persons found eligible for conditional release to a less restrictive alternative from accessing a personal computer and accessing the internet unless the person's individualized treatment plan states that access to a computer is necessary to bring about a positive response to a specific course of treatment.

Senate Joint Resolution 8208 (Conflicting residency requirement for voting in a presidential election)
Introduced by Sen. Michael Carrell, (R-Lakewood) (R) on January 16, 2009, proposes an amendment to the state Constitution to repeal in its entirety Section 1A of Article VI of the constitution, which sets forth residency qualifications for new resident before they can vote in a presidential election.

Posted by pudge at January 18, 2009 08:29 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Interesting mix... From the Slavery Party we have bills to protect the status-quo and current politicians, and to increase taxes. From the GOP we have bills to reduce spending, and protect citizens from sex offenders.

Sounds about right!

Posted by: Shanghai Dan on January 18, 2009 09:15 AM
2. And again, we have Senate Joint Resolution 8205, Amending the Constitution to allow an income tax.

And, SB 5104, deceptively described as "Providing fiscal reform."

Both from Sen. Rosa Franklin, (D-Tacoma)

Will it continue to be defeated?

Posted by: Lew Waters on January 18, 2009 12:57 PM
3. Curiouser and curiouser.

Posted by: Michele on January 18, 2009 02:16 PM
4. All this liberal talk about protecting the public, and the evil-doings of businesses through regulations, but not one bill that actually protects the public. Huh. I guess their liberal business friends don't want to operate under the yoke of regulations. I see a lot of bills regarding taxes, reduction in transparency, and liberal propaganda, but nothing with substance. Ahh... but what can you expect from a place that calls themselves "liberals" then vote down an affirmative action law so they can send their lily white kids to UW without competition from those pesky minorities.

Posted by: Thomas B. on January 18, 2009 03:23 PM
5. My favorite so far is HB 1307 which, among other things, authorizes counties to assess a $.05 on bottled water to fund public health "core functions." I don't even care about that tax because I think people who drink bottle water are mostly pretentious snobs

BUT the bill also includes a provision making it illegal to list the tax separately on sales receipts - it must be rolled into the price of the water - thus hiding the tax from the average consumer.

Now that irks me.

(Hoping this link works...)
Lies of Omission

Posted by: Paula on January 18, 2009 03:39 PM
6. wow, Paula, that illegal to list the tax separately on sales receipts thing is creepy. another example of sleezy politicians that we can't trust. Hope that proposed law flops bigtime.

Posted by: Michele on January 19, 2009 12:39 AM
7. Not any different than how they tax tobacco. They add a tax at the wholesale level and then levy a sales tax on the retail price. Tax on the tax.

Posted by: Vince on January 19, 2009 05:34 AM
8. Boy, those savings on the B&O tax alone will put the State in the black, won't it? Can't wait for the OFM report on this one.

And so Microsoft, Boeing and other high tech companies are whining about the lack of high end training and quality of job candidates and we do what... do something to discourage companies getting professionals? Back to first paragraph, the cost isn't much, so why ruit it.

Posted by: swatter on January 19, 2009 07:31 AM
9. Wow, speaking of public art, where in the name of 6 or 8 or 10 billion will the public art be displayed in the Viaduct Project. 1% of 6 billion is a whole lot of paintings. I am in the wrong service racket.

Posted by: swatter on January 19, 2009 07:33 AM
10. The approach taken in Wisconsin to solve budget deficits and pension trust investments losses is instructive. Note Gov Ted Strickland's (D) political affiliation.

1. Requested state employees unions to agree to a 5% reduction in salaries across the board as an alternative to layoffs.

http://blog.cleveland.com/openers/2009/01/state_employees_stunned_by_req.html

2. Changes sought in pension system to vary benefits in proportion to investment returns.

http://www.madison.com/wsj/topstories/433135

What are the odds that Gregoire would even contemplate such an approach?

Posted by: Paddy on January 19, 2009 11:30 AM
11. What? No coverage of SB 5060??

Being a home brewer who loves to share my beer, I'm always conflicted about breaking the law until I'm a couple pints into one of my kegs at a party; then all I hear is Beavis chanting "breakin' the law! breakin' the law!"

If SB 5060 passes, I won't have all that guilt and shame ruining the first 5 minutes of every party where I supply the beer.

Posted by: blindman on January 19, 2009 09:29 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?