November 06, 2008
Valerie Jarrett's Record

Jarrett has been close to both Barack Obama and Michelle Obama for years and is now co-chairwoman of his transition team.  It is fair, I think, to say that her record shows much about both Obamas, since the three have been allies for so long.

Jarrett worked briefly as a lawyer for Mayor Harold Washington, and stayed on after his death to become Mayor Richard Daley's Deputy Chief of Staff.  In other words, she was a key cog in the Daley machine.

She is also a businesswoman, CEO of the Habitat company, which manages housing in Chicago, not always successfully.  The Boston Globe did a very substantial investigation of the problems in some of the housing that she, and other allies of Obama, managed.  You should read their whole exposé, and even watch the video that accompanies it.  Here are some samples to show you why you will want to read the whole thing.

Grove Parc has become a symbol for some in Chicago of the broader failures of giving public subsidies to private companies to build and manage affordable housing - an approach strongly backed by Obama as the best replacement for public housing.

As a state senator, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee coauthored an Illinois law creating a new pool of tax credits for developers.  As a US senator, he pressed for increased federal subsidies.  And as a presidential candidate, he has campaigned on a promise to create an Affordable Housing Trust Fund that could give developers an estimated $500 million a year.

But a Globe review found that thousands of apartments across Chicago that had been built with local, state, and federal subsidies - including several hundred in Obama's former district - deteriorated so completely that they were no longer habitable.

Grove Parc and several other prominent failures were developed and managed by Obama's close friends and political supporters.  Those people profited from the subsidies even as many of Obama's constituents suffered.  Tenants lost their homes; surrounding neighborhoods were blighted.
. . .
Among those tied to Obama politically, personally, or professionally are:

Valerie Jarrett, a senior adviser to Obama's presidential campaign and a member of his finance committee. Jarrett is the chief executive of Habitat Co., which managed Grove Parc Plaza from 2001 until this winter and co-managed an even larger subsidized complex in Chicago that was seized by the federal government in 2006, after city inspectors found widespread problems.
. . .
Campaign finance records show that six prominent developers - including Jarrett, Davis, and Rezko - collectively contributed more than $175,000 to Obama's campaigns over the last decade and raised hundreds of thousands more from other donors. Rezko alone raised at least $200,000, by Obama's own accounting.
. . .
"Throughout his career in public service, Barack Obama has advocated for the development of mixed-income housing and public-private partnerships to create affordable housing as an alternative to publicly subsidized, concentrated, low-income housing," the Obama campaign said in a statement provided to the Globe.

As a result, some people in Chicago's poorest neighborhoods are torn between a natural inclination to support Obama and a concern about his relationships with the developers they hold responsible for Chicago's affordable housing failures.  Some housing advocates worry that Obama has not learned from those failures.

There are, I think, four great lessons in this sordid story, three easy lessons and one less so.  First, many of Barack Obama's long-time allies, including one of the closest, Valerie Jarrett, are sleazy.  That isn't a surprise to anyone familiar with the Chicago machine.  Second, Obama must have known they were sleazy — unless he never read a Chicago newspaper.  Third, Valerie Jarrett does not belong on his transition team, or anywhere near the White House.

The fourth lesson is less obvious, but may be the most important of all.  These public-private partnerships failed spectacularly, causing great suffering to poor people — and Obama appears to have learned nothing from that failure.  He wants to do many more of these partnerships.

In some ways, his failure to learn is understandable.  After all, the partnerships worked out very well for him, and for some of his allies.

There's an old saying among students of government: personnel is policy.  By making Valerie Jarrett co-chairwoman of his transition team, Obama has told us something about the policies he will pursue — and who will benefit from those policies.

Cross posted at Jim Miller on Politics.

(Even some leftists are troubled by Jarrett's record, as you can see here.

There are aerial pictures of some of the properties here and another long post here.

For what it is worth, Jarrett does not come from a poor background.  Her father was a doctor, and like senators Obama and Biden, she attended a private school.)

Posted by Jim Miller at November 06, 2008 05:13 PM | Email This
Comments
1. The grimmest speculation concerning the aims and methods of the new Obama administration holds that it will combine the sleazy methods of the Chicago machine with the poisonous philosopies of the authoritarian political far left.

The transition team now contains 50% of these ingredients. That's the "change" cohort.

I shall now hope that the grimmest speculation does not prevail. That's "hoping" that the administration has beneficial intentions for all of us quivering Americans who do not owe allegience to Chicago.

Posted by: Insufficiently Sensitive on November 6, 2008 05:28 PM
2. Obama is a weak, vain man and Russia already started to exploit this. I am appalled (but not surprised) at how the MSM kept glossing over Obama's consistently poor judgement in his professional associations. The fact he is part of the Chicago machine should have had voters running in the other direction. America will pay a heavy price for putting a snake oil salesman in charge of this great country. Pandora's box was pretty on the outside too, but the contents were just as ugly as Obama's inner character. "It's all Bush's fault!" will only work for so long before many voters realize they backed the wrong horse. God save America.

Posted by: Burdabee on November 6, 2008 05:36 PM
3. I'm not sure why anyone should be surprised by this move by Obama. He's surrounded himself with dirtbags his entire life, so why change now? This man is the ultimate B.S.'er in life; the schmoozer who'll talk you out of your coat in a rainstorm while he doesn't get a drop on himself and could care less about you as he strolls down the road smiling.
He is all rhetoric and little substance and I think he shows some distinct socio-pathic tendencies (most likely from his father being a "no-show" most of his life-read deadbeat dad). He's had to rely on social engineering in order to ascend the ladder and has just climbed one rung to another rung until he reached the limits of his ego. No plan formulated as he could worry about that once he got there (can you say Hope/Change, but no specifics).

This is the beginnings of the Clinton scandals of the 1990's x10, but what can you expect by electing the pollution byproduct of the Chicago Political machine?

Posted by: Rick D. on November 6, 2008 05:45 PM
4. very telling.....lets see how people like the Chicago mob running the country.....

but then again look what the barry voter had to ignore to vote for him....mob connections, marxist philosophy,cavorting with terrorists and sucking up to foreign terrorist...the ungodly amount of money raised from foreign countries and ultra rich elitist...promising skyrocketing electricity rates and destruction of coal companies..

it will not be my children fighting for him....he'll be starting a draft soon and I just hope it hits his uneducated and unthinking voters first....let it be their kids that get drafted since they anointed this tool

Posted by: lee on November 6, 2008 06:32 PM
5. My guess is that the Obama honeymoon will last about a year until Americans will realize they were hoodwinked. He was elected based on false promises, now he has to govern and it will be hard to fake it. I find it hilarious that the media is now starting to ask themselves questions. I have heard a large number of media members saying "I have no idea what his world view is so I have no clue what kind of person he will nominate for Sec of State or Defense or NSC" Maybe they should have been less obsessed about the size of Obama's campaign crowds and more obsessed with what Obama would do if he actually had to govern.

Posted by: jk on November 6, 2008 06:42 PM
6. Jim's reminder that ''personnel is policy'' in politics is indeed a key factor to keep watching as the Obama Administration starts to take shape.

So far we have:
Senator and VP-elect Joe Biden:
Somewhere around the 3rd most liberal member of the US Senate.
Rahm Emanuel for Chief of Staff:
A smart guy, but with a well-deserved reputation for being a bare-knucle partisan politician; who came out of (surprise, surprise): The Chicago political machine.
And now Valerie Jarrett as transition co-chair.
I didn't really know much about her until Jim did his excellent above job of filling in the blanks.

Credit where due:
Obama gave a very good speech after he was declared the winner; both delivery and content (''Presidential'', not partisan; and considerably ''middle of the road'' (for him, certainly) ). But the above start to ''personnel is policy'' for the new Administration is NOT a good beginning.

Posted by: Methow Ken on November 6, 2008 07:13 PM
7. You can put lipstick on a pig. But you still have a pig. And Chicago thugs are pigs.

Speeches are just words. Judge him by his actions.

Posted by: Snuffy on November 6, 2008 11:31 PM
8. It is apparent in the face of the loss of a million jobs and the worst financial crises in history the criticism needs to be toward the regime of the last eight years. What possible reasoning could Obama's detractors have for negative posts except fear and ignorance. No sane American should want more of what got us here. Look to the legacy of Bush to see exactly how precisely Prescott Bush's plans were carried out--right down to Wall Street and the now infamous bailout. Incidentally ... how are the portfolios of the Obama detractors doing these days? More importantly people need to realize the sun rises and sets on America. Change is desperatly needed and the country voted for the candidate in whom they have placed their confidence. Ain't nobody in D.C. or out of it for that matter squeaky clean. Stop balling, roll up your sleaves and find out what you can do to contribute to this great democracy we call America.

Posted by: Jeannie on November 8, 2008 04:51 AM
9. For those who are happy with the current disastrous economic situation - 1.2 M people out of a job, just to name one - would probably have liked W and his cohorts to stay on. I don't see how Obama or anyone else can do worse than the mess W and his neo-cons have created.

Posted by: bill on November 8, 2008 11:23 AM
10. Anyone so quick to criticize President Elect Obama and his business associates cannot be familiar with President Bush's highly questionable business dealings from the 1990's, including deals done by Harken Energy and Bush Explorations. And President Bush's associations with unsavory characters (including those of his father's) pales in comparison next to anything that can be tied to P E Omaba. Infact, but for daddy stepping in and stopping an SEC investigation with respect to Harken, President Bush may very well be a convicted felon right now.

As stated so well by Jeannie in this string, there are lots of dirty people in politics, so cleanliness cannot be the real reason people dislike PE Obama. Those who hated him before will find ways to hate him even more now.

What's difficult for the losers of this election to swallow is that their politics were rejected by a broad section of America. President Bush has done great damage to this country in the eyes of many and it'll take someone like PE Obama to save her.


Posted by: JimmyDean on November 9, 2008 08:56 AM
11. Anyone so quick to criticize President Elect Obama and his business associates cannot be familiar with President Bush's highly questionable business dealings from the 1990's, including deals done by Harken Energy and Bush Explorations. And President Bush's associations with unsavory characters (including those of his father's) pales in comparison next to anything that can be tied to P E Omaba. Infact, but for daddy stepping in and stopping an SEC investigation with respect to Harken, President Bush may very well be a convicted felon right now.

As stated so well by Jeannie in this string, there are lots of dirty people in politics, so cleanliness cannot be the real reason people dislike PE Obama. Those who disliked him before the elction will find ways to dislike him even more now.

What's difficult for some to accept is that their politics were rejected by a broad section of America.


Posted by: JimmyDean on November 9, 2008 09:00 AM
12. As I am sitting on pins & needles waiting to see if this incompetent executive will soon be my Senator. I truly hoping that Blagojevich will pick someone else, but since his a$$ is in a sling right now I highly doubt it.

Posted by: JM on November 10, 2008 06:25 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?