October 15, 2008
Twists in the Reichert Race as Ballots Go Out

Reichert's latest ad goes right after Burner on the image of youth, inexperience, and partisanship that has been forged since the start of her 2006 run:

The netroots and Burner backers will protest, but the same themes seen in Reichert's ad are come out in a slightly different way in a new article from Time magazine on the race. The piece includes this short quote that inadvertently summarizes much of the race so far:

And yet Burner has focused surprisingly little on the pocketbook issues that are drawing voters to Democratic candidates around the country.

In the all-important race for campaign cash, Burner benefits from her blogosphere profile. She has raised $2.3 million, much of it from outside her district.

Money from outside the district and issues that don't match it either. That makes for a fiery race, but not necessarily a winning one.

Speaking of which, independent polling the race continues to indicate the race favors Reichert (yes, I'm not including partisan, internal polls because those usually include "messaging" questions, rather than just a direct voter preference question).

There was that SurveyUSA poll in early September that showed a 10-point Reichert lead. While that seemed a bit high, perhaps a bit of the post-Palin pick bump, note that no public poll has yet shown anything but a Reichert lead.

The most recent public poll was a Research 2000 survey, conducted for DailyKos (!), showed Reichert ahead by eight.

Reichert probably has a lead, though a smaller one than that which the polls above indicate. It's not the Presidential race is going to help boost Republicans down the ballot.

He'll have to close well to win, given the now established Democratic preference of the district. His campaign is well-positioned to do so given the degree to which he has worked to align himself to his constituents...all while Burner still seems to have trouble breaking through with voters who otherwise vote Democratic.

It won't be easy, but it's more than doable.

UPDATE: part of the reason it won't be easy, as we've discussed before, Reichert will be outspent in this race. Darcy Burner is simply a better fundraiser than him, even before one starts discussing the monetary advantage the DCCC has over the NRCC this cycle.

Posted by Eric Earling at October 15, 2008 09:27 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Now that's one hellva ad.....and it keeps the message simple and direct..good show

Posted by: Nick on October 15, 2008 09:28 PM
2. "Money from outside the district"

Actually, Burner has raised more money, from more donations, from more donors inside the district than Reichert has according to FEC filings.

Posted by: Daniel K on October 15, 2008 09:51 PM
3. She is just lame - net roots are all puff

Darcy is a clone Kos clone

Posted by: Kerry on October 15, 2008 10:50 PM
4. Yeah, as I said before, Darcy, go back to law school. Go hang out in your academic lefty lawyer circles and make yourself feel better. FInish something. And then, learn to calm down and act like a smooth politician and not David Goldstein. That might be able to get you elected.

Oh, and when you try again, choose a district that matches your politics.

Posted by: Jeff B. on October 15, 2008 10:57 PM
5. I love it.

Partisan = Democrat

Maybe if the Republicon Party wasn't working overtime to destroy our economy, ship jobs overseas, de-regulate banks, and invade countries that were no threat, Reichert could hold onto his seat.


The only thing he has going for him is low information voters....

Just think. They (The 8th District) can vote to send one of Congress's least effective frauds back to be part of the permanent minority. He can work on obstruction full time, which is about all the totally discredited party of hate will be able to do for a generation.....

Bin Laden could have only dreamed of damaging America as much as the GOP has in the last 15 years, or better yet 30 years. Good thing their time is over. They should get on their boats like the Elves in Lord of the Rings, and get the hell out of Dodge, and let adults run the government!

Posted by: All Facts Support My Positions on October 15, 2008 11:03 PM
6. @2,

What do you want to bet that if you count donations under $200 (that don't show up in the FEC database), that Burner has far more from outside the 8th CD than Reichert?


Posted by: Smoley on October 15, 2008 11:47 PM
7. No KOS people representing MY district!

Posted by: Michele on October 15, 2008 11:51 PM
8. The Time story has at least one error. It says Darcy worked at Microsoft for 12 years. It may also be understating Reichert's visibility pre 1999 and 2001.

Posted by: Commentator on October 16, 2008 01:13 AM
9. Got an e-mail from Jim McDermott pleading with people in his district to send buckets of cash to Burner to save us from the evil Bush--er--Reichert. Ironically, I don't live in either district.

Posted by: Camille on October 16, 2008 05:09 AM
10. OH so Bagdad Jim is trying to get more money for Darcy. That sure will not help Darcy in this district. A lot of people do not like McDermott and it can backlash on Darcy to say the least.

Posted by: David Anfinrud on October 16, 2008 07:42 AM
11. @5. That's interesting. When did Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Maxine Waters switch parties?

Posted by: Dave on October 16, 2008 09:15 AM
12. Dave @ 11. Great comeback for lack of facts @ 5. If he had any "facts" he would understand that Democrat policies have caused jobs to be sent to other countries. He would know that the leftist machine has played on peoples base instinct to dislike, even hate those who they percieve as having more than the do, you know rich, thus allowing the machine to use this hatred for the advancement of the leftist ideology. Why that makes factless a useful idiot. How sad and pathetic.

Posted by: REBEL on October 16, 2008 12:41 PM
13. Man, factless, you really doubled up your scumbag medication before THAT post!

Posted by: Hinton on October 16, 2008 01:27 PM
14. The opening statement by Darcy was such a hoot! I expected her to say "I just want to, like, tell you that the, um, FISA bill, like, I mean, really sucks", while smacking on a big gob of gum! Sucks? She's kind of old to be an uneducated, vulgar teenager wannabe!

Posted by: katomar on October 16, 2008 02:45 PM
15. That picture... little darcy... looks so constipated!

Kooliad will do that.

Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold on October 16, 2008 05:54 PM
16. look, let's be genteel; she's out of her league; simple; come back after life, age & real work & politics have tempered you in the flames; for now, nothing wrong with being a homeowner's assoc. CEO;

Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on October 16, 2008 07:48 PM
17. Isn't one of those "concerned citizens" shaking their heads wearing an Obambi button?

Posted by: fiatboomer on October 16, 2008 09:17 PM
18. Watching the debate between Darcy & Dave hosted by Cityclub. Every time she opens her mouth she doesn't give an answer but a propoganda speech.

Darcy what are you saying? Where the hell is your substance?

She is as much a hack now as she was when she was at Microsoft.

Posted by: DJ on October 18, 2008 05:55 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?