Reichert's latest ad goes right after Burner on the image of youth, inexperience, and partisanship that has been forged since the start of her 2006 run:
The netroots and Burner backers will protest, but the same themes seen in Reichert's ad are come out in a slightly different way in a new article from Time magazine on the race. The piece includes this short quote that inadvertently summarizes much of the race so far:
And yet Burner has focused surprisingly little on the pocketbook issues that are drawing voters to Democratic candidates around the country.In the all-important race for campaign cash, Burner benefits from her blogosphere profile. She has raised $2.3 million, much of it from outside her district.
Money from outside the district and issues that don't match it either. That makes for a fiery race, but not necessarily a winning one.
Speaking of which, independent polling the race continues to indicate the race favors Reichert (yes, I'm not including partisan, internal polls because those usually include "messaging" questions, rather than just a direct voter preference question).
There was that SurveyUSA poll in early September that showed a 10-point Reichert lead. While that seemed a bit high, perhaps a bit of the post-Palin pick bump, note that no public poll has yet shown anything but a Reichert lead.
The most recent public poll was a Research 2000 survey, conducted for DailyKos (!), showed Reichert ahead by eight.
Reichert probably has a lead, though a smaller one than that which the polls above indicate. It's not the Presidential race is going to help boost Republicans down the ballot.
He'll have to close well to win, given the now established Democratic preference of the district. His campaign is well-positioned to do so given the degree to which he has worked to align himself to his constituents...all while Burner still seems to have trouble breaking through with voters who otherwise vote Democratic.
It won't be easy, but it's more than doable.
UPDATE: part of the reason it won't be easy, as we've discussed before, Reichert will be outspent in this race. Darcy Burner is simply a better fundraiser than him, even before one starts discussing the monetary advantage the DCCC has over the NRCC this cycle.
Posted by Eric Earling at October 15, 2008 09:27 PM | Email ThisActually, Burner has raised more money, from more donations, from more donors inside the district than Reichert has according to FEC filings.
Posted by: Daniel K on October 15, 2008 09:51 PMDarcy is a clone Kos clone
Posted by: Kerry on October 15, 2008 10:50 PMOh, and when you try again, choose a district that matches your politics.
Posted by: Jeff B. on October 15, 2008 10:57 PMPartisan = Democrat
Maybe if the Republicon Party wasn't working overtime to destroy our economy, ship jobs overseas, de-regulate banks, and invade countries that were no threat, Reichert could hold onto his seat.
The only thing he has going for him is low information voters....
Just think. They (The 8th District) can vote to send one of Congress's least effective frauds back to be part of the permanent minority. He can work on obstruction full time, which is about all the totally discredited party of hate will be able to do for a generation.....
Bin Laden could have only dreamed of damaging America as much as the GOP has in the last 15 years, or better yet 30 years. Good thing their time is over. They should get on their boats like the Elves in Lord of the Rings, and get the hell out of Dodge, and let adults run the government!
Posted by: All Facts Support My Positions on October 15, 2008 11:03 PMWhat do you want to bet that if you count donations under $200 (that don't show up in the FEC database), that Burner has far more from outside the 8th CD than Reichert?
Kooliad will do that.
Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold on October 16, 2008 05:54 PMDarcy what are you saying? Where the hell is your substance?
She is as much a hack now as she was when she was at Microsoft.
Posted by: DJ on October 18, 2008 05:55 PM