September 21, 2008
The Governor's Race from 30,000 Feet

It's easy to get absorbed in the latest poll, the most recent debate, or the issue of the week on the campaign trail. Let's take a step back a consider a few factors in the big picture:

1) Dino Rossi was an unknown quantity in 2004. Christine Gregoire's languid campaign coupled with his own energetic and effective work on the trail led to the surprising nail-biter we saw that year. One wonders what the outcome that year would have been if early absentee voters had partaken of more of the race before casting their ballots.

2) Rossi started this election cycle with significantly higher name ID and a formidable reservoir of good will with the voting public than many quality challengers in a major statewide race. He doesn't have to introduce himself this time to many voters, he simply has to build on his positive first impression to affirm: "yes, I'm yet again a solid choice to change the way Olympia does business given the problems we face."

3) Gregoire is an incumbent who is consistently polling under 50%. Depending on which political pro you talk to, they'll say the standard rule of thumb is that late-deciding voters in competitive races break 2 or 3 to 1 against the incumbent in years where the electorate is restive.

4) Gregoire isn't just under 50%; Rossi is gaining. Look at the trend from pollster.com:

Rossi has been trending up and Gregoire has been trending down since the campaign season (as marked by major ad spending by all sides) began in earnest. Something about Rossi is selling well - even in the face of $2+ million in negative ads run against him by Evergreen Progress. Something about Gregoire isn't. And let's be honest, none of the independent spending against her has been mind-blowing in its effectiveness either.

5) Gregoire's recent debate performance affirms her campaign is all about attacking Rossi. She doesn't have meaningful accomplishments that resonate with the current mood of the electorate. She doesn't have much of a vision for addressing top issues on the minds of voters. All she can do is try to dirty Rossi up and hope for the best in a state that otherwise leans blue.

Six weeks out from Election Day is a long time for any candidate, let alone an incumbent, to try and hold to such a strategy - at least without turning off voters. Rossi's ability to run an affable campaign that draws contrasts without being abrasive amplifies that dilemma for Team Gregoire.

Summation: there a lot of factors that mean Dino Rossi is in a great position to win this race. The problem remains he could run a great campaign and still end up with 49.97% of the vote...because Washington is Washington. But, his own campaign is in better position in 2008 than it was in 2004, while Gregoire's campaign has started flailing at an even earlier stage than the first time around.

Meaning: it looks like we can expect copious buckets of mud from Gregoire and her allies from here on out.

Posted by Eric Earling at September 21, 2008 10:21 PM | Email This
Comments
1. If I were Gregoire, I'd be planning a big Halloween party at the Governor's mansion. Might as well go out with a bang.

Posted by: Jeff B. on September 21, 2008 10:51 PM
2. That is not surprising. OVerall Democrats have nothing to sell the people on. I have seen so many elections now that personal attacks is the Democrat main way to get elected. Or Fear. Fear the evil Republicans they are going to kill the children, kill the old people, Starve the innocent.
The GOvernor has nothing to show that she was doing what is best for the state. No program showing she cares. But she has shown that she will support special interests. This is not a good year to be identified with that group anywhere in the country. Her pay raises for State employees knowing there is a deficit looming. Everything points that if enough people can learn the truth of the Queen they will be turned off.
Lots of questions need to be answered.
1. Deficit what are your plans? How will you balance the budget?
2. Transportation. Why was the priority of the DOT not relieving COngestion. You were Govenor yet you did not direct your DOT to figure out how to fix the current traffic problems. Audit finding of State Auditor.
3. WHy did you not use the State AUdits performed in the Past few years to improve our STate Budget. As the GOvernor you could have worked with the Democrat majority to improve the State Finance. Yet both you and the Democrats in both the house and Senate refused to review the findings to improve spending.
4. Why were so many fees increased. yet you said you would not increase taxes. Fees collected by any government organization is a tax. It is collected by the state and spent by the state for various things. Because you mince words and claim you did not increase fees.
5. Why did the State BUdget increase by 33% under your command?
6. How long does it take to build Ferries. We have had money budgeted for years yet it will still be years before they will be on service.
7. WHy did you claim ferries were in perfect safe yet a couple weeks later took them off service. WHat happened to the ferries in a couple of weeks to cause them to be removed from service.
8. How many commissions are there making determinations of future State plans. When will be get their reports? WIll it take a decade for a decision to be made waiting on these commisions invetigations?
9. What is your solution for higher Energy costs. Electricity cost increasing. Gas Prices increasing. Natural Gas Cost increasing and Fuel oil for heating increasing. What is your plan to get these rising costs undercontrol? So why are we building a windfarm which costs 3 to 4 times more to produce the same electricity. Which increase the overall costs of our energy? This effects every family and the poor more than anyone else. It means to heat the home during the winter it takes a bigger precentage of their income. WIll they have to choose between Heat or Food.
ANd I bet I can think for a while and come up with a lot more.

Posted by: David Anfinrud on September 21, 2008 11:05 PM
3. Go, Rossi! We believe.....

Posted by: Michele on September 21, 2008 11:44 PM
4. Folks, if you get a moment this morning, go to the PI Editorial Board comment in todays paper. They have actually said in defense of Gregoire, that the State doesn't have a spending problem, it has a revenue problem. I will paraphrase a recent political Ad "Don't they drug test at the PI Editorial Board?". I beleive the problem may be that they DO test drugs at the PI Editorial Board.

Posted by: Smokie on September 22, 2008 06:27 AM
5. It is an ongoing mantra of Democrats.

The problem is our tax structure is wrong, so the government is not collecting enough money.

People keep pushing for a state income tax. Just how is that going to work when the only people with jobs work for the state?

Posted by: Vince on September 22, 2008 06:51 AM
6. Smokie @ 4:

Could that mean you have to test positive for acid to be a Pravda-Izvestia (P-I) editorialist? That would explain it.......

Posted by: Saltherring on September 22, 2008 06:51 AM
7. David KLOWNstein seems to be Gregoire's new "talking points" writer.
KLOWNstein, of the fringe lunatic left Blog called HorsesAss, and Gregoire seem to be wordsmithing the term Deficit.
They fail to acknowledge Gregoire's $8 BILLION or 31% increase in spending has any impact on the upcoming Budget.
Gregoire knowingly increased spending $8 BILLION, even acknowledging it was unsustainable.
Hence we have a Budget trainwreck...but somehow it's not Gregoire's fault??

WOW!

Let's refer to the Gregoire/KLOWNstein duo as TEAM HORSESASS!

Posted by: Mr. Cynical on September 22, 2008 07:39 AM
8. As Ronald Reagan once said "Government is not the solution. It is the problem." Here we have the local newspapers demanding what a hidden way to was we need an state income tax. Watch them say the wealthy do not pay thier fair share and we need to tax them more to give you more. Socialism alive and well in this state. Every day we get closer to being like Michigan. Look at what happened to that state because of that same thinking.
No attempt to hold politicians accountable for thier spending habits. 33% increase in State Governement Budget in 4 years. THat is a lot. My pay did not increase that much. Did yours?
The comments by the PI show that they only support GOvernment spending programs are they going to be asking for Government assistance to keep publishing thier paper due to all the loss of revenue. Maybe this is a way they can get a cut of the Government Budget.
I love the impartial and fair evaluation that shows all sides of the topic. Opps. One side of the topic. Spending with no accountability. Just give them more. How often in the past 40 years have we heard it will work if we just spend more money on the issue? Have any of the problems been solved. OR did they get worse.
It is one thing to have programs that work and get funded. Another to say it would work if they had more money. IF a program works it works. If it doesnt cut funding to it. Put the money into things that work. Not money to special interests that are only interested in bleeding the government dry of money.

Posted by: David Anfinrud on September 22, 2008 07:43 AM
9. The Dems have no one to blame for the looming fiscal crisis except themselves. They have held all the cards for 24 years in the governor's mansion and most of that time in the legislature.

In Washington, a Republican governor is the change..

Posted by: LCRW on September 22, 2008 11:29 AM
10. The Democrats of this state have been waiting for the "perfect storm" to come along so they may implement a state income tax. They now are two months away from this perfect storm becoming reality.

This storm is perfect because of the current economy, a governor who has nothing to lose (not seeking re-election), an overwhelming, Democratic majority in both houses (doesn't matter if we lose a few members next election due to electoral backlash, we will still have a majority)and they can likely muster up enough support (by scaring people) that they could get some public support.

The argument will be: "our state's revenue stream does not work in modern society. We need a more stable flow of income, that comes with an income tax, to pay for education, transit, health care and all our entitlement programs. Under the current system, we are unable to project revenues. Property values swing way too much, the sales tax is too dependent on people having enough disposable income to make large purchases, people are driving less, using transit more, which makes the gas tax revenues too low to support our infrastructure and, most importantly, the rich do not pay their "fair share" under our current system. This economy is a glaring example for tax reform in our state"

Posted by: Ron on September 22, 2008 11:48 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?