David Postman is leaving the Seattle Times for a position with Paul Allen's Vulcan Ventures.
I wish Postman the very best in the next stage of his career. But his absence from journalism will be a loss. While too much mainstream journalism suffers from bias, superficiality, laziness and credulity, Postman's work has been a noteworthy exception. In my experience, he has been thorough, knowledgeable, open to a variety of perspectives and fair. Not to mention a very decent human being.
It's increasingly apparent that there's a problem with the economics of newsgathering that leads some of the best and brightest journalists to leave the newsroom for positions with government, candidates or politically active business interests. In recent months alone, Postman has been preceded by veteran state reporters David Ammons, Robert Mak, Ralph Thomas and others. I'm happy for all of these folks personally, but overall, this trend isn't obviously good for the cause of transparent and accountable government.
His over the top flogging for Darcy Burner and the Governor were embarassing to an objective reader. He refused to look into any impropriety like the Maple Valley Donut Hole payoff with Ron Sims, Yarrow Bay Development and Martin Durkan Jr.. He used Goldy as a Source for gosh sakes! Good luck to him, personally but professionally he lacked objectivity in my opinion.
Posted by: Huh? on September 5, 2008 11:00 AMThink before you speak, moron.
Posted by: demo kid on September 5, 2008 11:38 AMHypocrite.
That said, Postman will not be any loss to "journalism" generally, or the Times specifically.
While not as bad as the chief gas bag in Seattle, Joel "Waste of Air" Connelly, he was just as much in the tank for the left as Joel... just a little more subtle about it... thus the acolades from the fringe-left blog nutters that Postman refered to in his efforts to drive traffic their way... acolades that don't go to unbiased sources.
The morons at HA, that little kid that is NPI... they're losing one of their own... and... they'll miss him! (sob)
Posted by: Hinton on September 5, 2008 11:57 AMThose idiots that couldn't hack it in Computer Science. In otherwords, morons like you demon kid.
Posted by: pbj on September 5, 2008 12:13 PMSay how is Robert Mak's position working out as the official hot chocolate taste tester for the City of Magical Million Dollar Toilets?
Posted by: Andy on September 5, 2008 01:23 PMSay isn't so! Gosh, those delusions die hard! {/sarcasm}
Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold on September 5, 2008 01:43 PMWith Postman's vocational demise, who now will there be to run contests for you and I to win?
He ran a fair shop, calling B.S. on looney tuners from the left and right.
Who will take his place? Given what we see from the Blethen's these days, look for a "gal in the front office-type" working in inside sales in the classifieds department to get the gig.
The Piper
Posted by: Piper Scott on September 5, 2008 01:56 PMOtherwise known as "you're talking out of your butt". Brilliant. It's faith-based debate! I'm amazed that anyone could think that your crotchety ramblings are anything close to the truth.
Seriously, teaching and journalism still do require dedication, and an interest beyond a paycheck. You can be doing a number of things with the same level of education that would be paying much, much more.
Posted by: demo kid on September 5, 2008 02:42 PMI am sure Postman will be treated well given his standing, but still, I think it is a step down for someone of Postman's skill level.
Postman is one of the few good ones. Sadly, there's probably not many other places of integrity to go for a high ranking journalist. I can see that Postman has more integrity than to simply take a job as some Democrat politician's mouthpiece or advisor.
It's a good hard lesson for journalism to learn. You better have a good product, or you should be kicked to the gutter like everything else in the USA that doesn't hold up to competition. Freedom means freedom to fail. And the MSM is failing spectacularly.
Posted by: Jeff B. on September 5, 2008 03:34 PMNow they are both gone.
Sucks to be us.
You are not ready to discuss diverse opinions and thoughts. You are simply trolling to make arguments for the argument sake along with name calling and crass speech.
Posted by: DopioLover on September 5, 2008 05:58 PMHuh. I got a degree in journalism, and, not to brag, but I am a successful and respected computer programmer, a world-recognized expert in Perl, web security, and more.
That said, yes, journalism is much easier than computer science. :-)
Bull. I've changed my stances and opinions as new information comes available, and I welcome new perspectives But I'm asking you to back up these claims, and you give me attitude. You're claiming that "most people agree with you", but where's the proof? You whine on about how journalists and teachers being biased, but tell me... how do you measure that? By the number of people that disagree with you?
If your reaction to any kind of challenge to your opinion is to cry and complain, you're definitely not "discussing diverse opinions". Don't kid yourself.
Posted by: demo kid on September 5, 2008 07:16 PMAnd who better to know then SP's CHIEF "butt talker?"
"I'm amazed that anyone could think that your crotchety ramblings are anything close to the truth."
Pot, kettle, black. More of your reeking hypocrisy.
It spews further: "Seriously, teaching and journalism still do require dedication." So do plumbing and ditch digging. None of these four jobs require ANYTHING EXCEPT "an interest" in a "paycheck."
Dumbo, the idea that the whiny, on-strike little punks masquerading as "teachers" in Bellevue are motivated by ANYTHING besides money is as moronic as your support of OhDrama or any other leftist.
Well, maybe not THAT moronic, since you've proven yourself to be quite the moron. But someone of even your simple cognitive skills should get the drift.
Posted by: Hinton on September 6, 2008 09:25 AMOne after another journalist goes into gov't or gov't connected work. No wonder the approval ratings of journalists are lower than even lawyers.
Posted by: russell garrard on September 6, 2008 01:14 PMMy guess is that he was on a tight leash, and part of why he left may well have been some discomfort with that.
More to the point - Vulcan? What's up with that? Postman's got one boss now (big Paul), and how interesting could it possibly be to flack about the big guy's toys and his SLU property developments? Sheesh . . .
Posted by: terrorist knuckleknock on September 6, 2008 01:36 PM