60 second ads are generally a bad choice short of Presidential politics or a high profile, statewide race. Why? Voters just don't care that much.
That alone makes Burners ad a tough sell. Clearly, her campaign understands that "Darcy Burner, know it all youngster" wasn't ultimately the best image of have ingrained in people's minds. The results of 2006 showed that.
This ad is an admirable effort at course correction (sans George W. Bush no less!). But, it throws an awful lot of information at the voter and let's be honest, even with an attempted image makeover, she still looks awfully young - which the "I worked for safe toys!" testimonial does little to correct.
Best news for Republicans: serious 60 second ad buys burn through cash pretty quickly.
Cross-posted at the Examiner.
Posted by Eric Earling at August 04, 2008 07:42 PM | Email ThisI mean, BFD. I could say I wrote a plan for the overthrow of Iran. Who cares? Just like Burner, I have no credibility in that area to be taken seriously.
I love her "Hey! I got a great idea! Why don't I run on "change" this time?. God!, I get so tired of hearing that. IF she wins, she'll be so junior she'll be lucky to have enough influence to get the janitor to change a light bulb in her office
Posted by: Dave on August 4, 2008 08:49 PMGag.
And isn't a lot of that ad from the FIRST time she lost?
And she's exploiting her fire tragedy???
My God, she IS the epitome of a political whore!
Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold on August 4, 2008 09:06 PMAnd I thought she was a product manager or had something to do with Microsoft's products or business.
Silly me, she was a community organizer.
Posted by: SouthernRoots on August 4, 2008 10:07 PMBut wait---I have a brillant beyond brillant idea for what she SHOULD be doing instead of running for congress. Obama needs a vice president. And he really needs someone whose resume won't make his look weaker than it already is. Darcy, honey, you are PERFECT for the job! I think we ought to alert his veep search committee about this new prospect.
Posted by: Michele on August 4, 2008 11:48 PMTurn his supposed strong point against him, which is his "experience" (of being the dumbest cop in US history for the longest period of time).
Posted by: John McDonald on August 5, 2008 07:33 AMHow can you tell when a liberal is on your blog? When you read a posting that begins with either "I'm a lifelong republican..." or "I'm a conservative but..."
Posted by: Johnny on August 5, 2008 08:13 AMYou hit it right on the head.
I'm no fan of Dave R, but Darcy????? Please.
Just like Obama. No back ground to look at.
Posted by: Army Medic/Vet on August 5, 2008 08:24 AMOxymoron?
Posted by: NW Denizen on August 5, 2008 08:51 AMOxymoron?
Posted by NW Denizen at August 5, 2008 08:51 AM
Drop the 'oxy' and you've got it.
Posted by: jimg on August 5, 2008 09:33 AMSo having said that fire is a natural disaster, but taxed out is not a natural disaster, it is pure government greed
nuf said - my votes are with my diminishing pocket book
R
And the Micosoft womans group. Clearly there's not a whole lot of depth to Darcy Burner, so she is looking for the few remotely leadership like events in her life.
People like Darcy Burner are a great example of what's wrong with politics. Rather than principled leadership from someone who has had a distinguished career and now wants to contribute a wise and balanced perspective. Instead we get these Johnny-come-lately Camp Wellstone grads with a bent for Power, a need for a private-sector like executive income, a Progressive control-minded ideology, and a need to accomplish something that was coming to them too slowly in their private careers. Solution, just run for office. It's not about what's good for the 8th District. It's about what's good for Darcy.
Posted by: Jeff B. on August 6, 2008 01:59 PM