A follow-up to this post about the race between Kevin Parker and Mel Lindauer ; I heard from some readers, did a little research, and have one major point to make.
Lindauer is obviously trying to exploit the fact Parker is newer to the district than he. Evidently, he finds it insufficient that Parker went to college in the district and has now decided to settle his family in it and open several coffee shops in the area. On the surface, Lindauer's gripe is lame.
True, there are a number of good reasons to draw contrasts with a fellow GOP opponent. This doesn't seem like one of them, especially when the lion's share of Lindauer's financial support itself is from outside the district.
A very quick review of available PDC data (click on "Legislative" candidates, click on district "06," then click on the chosen candidate) shows Lindauer reports $46,809 in cash contributions as of this typing. Of those, approximately $36,500 is from outside the district, and of that sum at least $25,000 is from his fellow optometrists. That last number is probably slightly higher since some smaller dollar donors are not required to report their occupation.
I think we can stipulate that raising roughly 78% of one's contributions from outside the district in which one is running does not leave one in the best shape to question the in-district bona fides of someone else. Moreover, having over 50% of one's contributions come from one industry - again, outside the district - doesn't exactly say "I'm the hometown boy!"
Contrasts on issues and qualifications for office are more than fair game, but I have no patience for these sort of tactics that Lindauer is engaging in, especially in a GOP primary. I hope Parker wins by a country mile, even before one considers the fact he's exactly the kind of person Republicans need in Olympia these days.
Posted by Eric Earling at July 28, 2008 08:50 PM | Email ThisThe people that actually live there will make their decision known in a few weeks, and then you can stop fretting about something that will have absolutely zero effect on you one way or the other.
Your efforts will do nothing to help your guy. The LAST thing he needs is someone from this side of the mountains assuming the voters in his district are too stupid to make their own decisions... kinda like the idiocy of the Seattle City Council passing a resolution to tear down dams.
Posted by: hinton on July 28, 2008 09:09 PMSigh. The arthritic "r" finger.
Posted by: hinton on July 28, 2008 09:14 PMWhy is it your business to care about why Eric cares, anyway?
Posted by: DopioLover on July 28, 2008 11:21 PM
Kevin Parker is doing something similar in that his volunteers have been to my house 3 times in the past two weeks and I think Kevin Parker is knocking on a lot of doors as well. It is kind of old-fashioned (but nice) when candidates go around the neighborhood like that. I think that is why Chris Marr won in 2006 and I suspect Kevin Parker will end up ahead of Mel Lindauer. However, there are so many candidates for this district who knows who will win?
As for Lindauer's contributions from the optometrist, optometrists have an agenda to expand the scope of what they can do in terms of medical procedures without actually going to medical school (full disclosure: My brother is an ophthalmologist).
Posted by: eeman on July 29, 2008 12:06 AMBut, I can live with it and it is, in fact, very appropriate.
Mainly, the Rs in this State are weak, so that any good R (or D for that matter- I just can't find any good Ds lately) should be promoted and any weak R should not be in Olympia.
Secondly, one of SPs commenters posted an article on this very subject, Eric read it, checked into it, and felt it important enough for the main page.
Lastly, Eric's PDC advice should be followed; the site is now very friendly and quicker. It even likes Mozilla all of a sudden, where before I used IE (I wasn't about to change security setting every time and have to log in every time with Mozilla).
Posted by: swatter on July 29, 2008 06:42 AMEvery time they sneeze, the rest of us catch cold. You bet that a bag tax is coming our way, now that the brilliant Seattle leaders have deemed it good.
It's naive to think that those outside of Spokane have no interest in that race, since it affects the balance of the Legislature.
Posted by: Camille on July 29, 2008 09:12 AMAs a Democrat Parker worries me more than Lindauer, because while I love Barlowe's legislative record he is *not* an effective campaigner in the way that it sounds like Parker is.
Posted by: Ryan on July 29, 2008 10:03 AMPlenty of the people in Spokane whom I know are supporting Mel, and none of them are optometrists, nor am I. They're just regular folks looking for a fresh face to go up against the Democratic juggernaut in Olympia.
Here's a suggestion: let the voters of Spokane decide whom their representative will be, without the advice of West-Siders -- whose legacy of futility and defeat is the last thing the GOP voters in eastern Washington need to emulate.
Posted by: Rey Smith in Spokane on July 30, 2008 01:39 PM