July 23, 2008
But, hey, everything will be ok in Washington, right?

Tomorrow's Wall Street Journal reports:

The stumbling U.S. economy is forcing states to slash spending and cut jobs in order to close a projected $40 billion shortfall in the current fiscal year.

That gap -- identified Wednesday in a survey by the National Conference of State Legislatures -- is more than triple the size of the previous year's. It is the result of broad economic weakness at the state and local levels that could cause pain throughout this year and into 2010. Sales-tax collections, for example, have been hurt by the housing slump and high gasoline prices, which are prompting cutbacks in consumer spending. Personal income-tax collections have been hit by rising unemployment, while corporate income-tax collections have been eroded by falling profits.

"We expect it to get worse before it gets better," said Corina Eckl, fiscal-program director of the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Not to worry here at home. Governor Christine Gregoire and her staff continue to ignore the $2.7 billion deficit projections of the Senate Ways & Means Committee staff. Months have passed since the Governor's own Office of Financial Management released numbers to guide planning by the Governor's office.

Actually, come to think of it, they might not need the numbers since Gregoire isn't worrying about it for now:

She said her own budget office, the Office of Financial Management, hasn't done its own analysis and that she'll wait for the one it'll produce later this year (after the election) that she'll write her budget proposal off of. [Ed. note: "after the election," that's convenient.]

"That's the one that really counts," Gregoire said.

She generally dismissed such talk of budget deficits, repeated what she's said before about deficit projections being merely projections and about the national economy dragging down Washington while expressing confidence in the state's economy.

"Now is not the time to panic," Gregoire said.

Maybe not panic, but public acknowledgment of reality and some actual planning by the state's chief executive to deal with a potentially massive budget shortfall sure sounds prudent.

Cross-posted at the Examiner.

Posted by Eric Earling at July 23, 2008 09:34 PM | Email This
Comments
1. I'm sure it's Bush's fault and if the state's could get away with it, they'd blame Tim Eyman for all their woes too.

Posted by: PC on July 23, 2008 09:26 PM
2. ...i have 'hope'...and we have 'change'...that's all that's needed...

said the spartan to the oar drummer: "...timekeeper--increase the beats!!..."

Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on July 23, 2008 10:14 PM
3. "...but public acknowledgment of reality and some actual planning by the state's chief executive to deal with a potentially massive budget shortfall sure sounds prudent."

Bush is national executive, but yeah, it would be nice if he'd ever submitted a balanced budget. (Then again, why should he differ from any other Republican President of the last forty years?)

You can tell me the local Democrats are paying you now. Really, you can.

Posted by: tensor on July 23, 2008 11:14 PM
4. "'That's the [budget analysis] that really counts,' Gregoire said."

Isn't this the equivelent of declaring "Quick, close the barn door!!" after the livestock have long since departed the structure?

She is right in saying 'now is not the time to panic' though. That has long since passed with a 2.7B deficit accumulated during her short reign. The panic has been supplanted with anger which I plan to carry to the ballot box in November and help bounce her sorry carcass from her Olympia throne.
God save the Queen, but to hell with Christine!

Posted by: Rick D. on July 24, 2008 05:46 AM
5. Or is this shortfall the plan of the GOvernor to make the people accept an income tax. Democrats have wanted that for the past decade. Maybe they can spend us into accepting an income tax.
State requires a balanced budget. IT is just that many of the promises made by democrats for Retirement underfunded to support increases in spending in other areas. Cutting services and raising fees. Make it impossible for people to go out in the woods making more and more inaccessible. Or rock collectors picking up some rocks from a stream and get fined 130 dollars because they did not have the right permit. Claims of changing stream movement to pick up a few agates maybe a whole lb of rock and it is killing the fish attitude.
Fees are increasing without any legislation involved. New rules added and people finded because who has time to read all the new legislation where they hide the rules and regulations in other topic bills.
What other rules are hidden from the public view that will not be enforced until after the election. What other hidden fees and business regulations will show up to attack those places that hire workers. Because they are evil. All because the demands of unlimited funds to fund unlimited programs that fail 90% of the time to do what they were suppose to do and they claim they need more money to make it work. Yea with the manager making a 6 figure salary on a failing project. But never cut the salary of the manager just because he needs more money to make it work.

Posted by: David Anfinrud on July 24, 2008 07:05 AM
6. Also in the WSJ, and I strongly encourage you to forward this link to everyone you know who has been responsible and flat out resents this wholesale transfer of the earnings of the responsible to the irresponsible and to the criminal.

Housing Bill Hammers Taxpayers
July 24, 2008; Page A14
Combine a housing meltdown with election-year politics and the results were not going to be pretty. Add a crisis in confidence in Washington's favorite quasipublic companies and what we're getting is a rout for taxpayers, especially those who kept their heads during the housing mania.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121685588403379069.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks

Posted by: JDH on July 24, 2008 07:11 AM
7. Yahoo has for some as yet undisclosed reason (From what I gather, it is not likely that I will ever find out because I do not have a spare couple hundred thousand dollars lying around to sue the information out of them with. There is only one individual who has ever succeeded in prying this information out of Yahoo and that is what it cost him in up front cost ) deactivated my choclab@rocketmail.com email address. In the short term I can be reached by email at choclab08@rocketmail.com

I have been trying to find out the reason for the deactivation and it could be that someone has been sending out commercial offers or has been using it in some other way to scam, but from what I have been able to glean off of the internet and by talking to IT professionals - Yahoo has deactivated more than a few long time email accounts (I had my choclab@rocketmail account since '95) because there are people who want (and are willing to pay for) the email addresses that other people have had "forever" and unscrupulous people within Yahoo have a documented history of deactivating accounts so that someone else could claim that address.

If I have learned one thing through this experience, it is that I STRONGLY encourage you to consider paying for an email account with any one of many reputable firms that will not arbitrarily and without notice deactivate an account and leave you with no way to reprieve archived material.

By the way I was PAYING Yahoo for additional storage and archiving and have only this (which was sent three days ago in my request for info on how to receive the material I had PAID to have archived:

Hello,

This is an automated message regarding your recent request for Yahoo!
Mail Customer Care support. We have received your message and will
respond within the next 48 hours with an answer.

Thank you for reaching out to us. We look forward to helping you!

Sincerely,

Yahoo! Customer Care

**Please do not respond to this message as no one will receive it.

Posted by: JDH on July 24, 2008 07:40 AM
8. This is all playing nicely into Gregoire's documented management style while at Ecology and in the AGs office.

She may cut forces or redirect traffic from the most vital services and leave the exotic programs. That way, in her mind, she can claim poverty and support the need to fund the traditional and essential government services. She won't even try to cut the exotics.

I hope the voters start seeing through this dense cloud. Alas, there is a new cloud of BS floating through the skies- the Dalai Bama.

Posted by: swatter on July 24, 2008 07:45 AM
9. Gregoire and her minions will just have to stop
hiring new state employees every hour of every
day 8 hours a day. Thats half a million more
payroll for the taxpayers every day. The egos of
the typical democrat are killing this county as
if the Republicans needed any help wrecking it.
All we can do locally is vote Rossi in and hope to slo em down a little. I'd like to see every single Senator and Congressman replaced with someone new. That should be the war cry of the American people.

Posted by: mark on July 24, 2008 08:50 AM
10. Gregoire and her budget director are engaged in a massive, election-year cover-up of the state's imminent financial crisis. Note that Gov. Gary Locke had little hesitation in publicizing his budget office's projection of a $2 billion-plus budget shortfall in 2004. Four years later, it wouldn't be "useful," says Gregoire flak-catcher Victor Moore, to tell the people what kind of a problem we're looking at six months from now. Why the difference? Why the candor from Locke in 2004, and the stonewalling from Gregoire in 2008? Maybe because Locke wasn't on the ballot in '04, and Gregoire is in '08? It's hard to come to any other conclusion. This is purely political. And it's the citizens and taxpayers of Washington who'll suffer for it.

Posted by: lakewood on July 24, 2008 12:17 PM
11. Queen Christine may not want to admit that she's trying to force an income tax on the electorate, but it's becoming pretty obvious that she's going to angle for one to balance her bloated budget without laying off state employees or cutting programs.

She should know that there are many small business people & retired folks who will pull up stakes & leave if that should happen. There might even be a large company or two that would leave under those circumstances.

The only reason that many people & companies remain in the socialist republic of Washington is due to the lack of an income tax.

Posted by: Clean House on July 24, 2008 01:06 PM
12. I am certain that I will wait until Hell freezes over before any elected officials of cities, counties and state government in Washington propose solutions based upon down sizing and hiring freezes. Consequently, I will vote straight Republican until th Devil is frozen out.

Posted by: Paddy on July 24, 2008 01:42 PM
13. The Supreme court will not hear (they don't need to hear, it will be a 5-4 decision) the 2/3 majority to raise taxes limits this state resoundingly placed on this Democratic legislature. They will overturn that but not until after the election.

They will then be ready to uphold the CAO, stealing your property, again a 5-4 decision.

I don't know if any of those liberal judges are running this time, but it is time to throw their asses to the wind.

Gregoire will not show any budget, nor even have her so called finance generals determine the defecit or general budget, unless she wins in November.

Then the wheels will come off in her next legislative session, and hang on to your pocket books, at a time when we can least afford it, we will get nailed to the wall in the next session.

That is so they will hop you will forget by the next session.

with 7000 new state employees, and another 7000 new if she wins again, we will be in one hell of a mess 4 years from now.

Bow down to the queen, she is coming and coming fast to the wallet and bank account near you. Her spending spree has been continuous and large at 8 Billion more in these 4 years than the last, but be assured it wil only get wilder in the next years.

Posted by: gs on July 24, 2008 04:13 PM
14. Spoke too soon, now the gang of thieves are putting a whopping 18 Billion (not even counting the 30 year bond repayments they have to make), so you can probably double that to 60 Billion easily, proposal on the Nov ballot.

About $140 per year per person and you won't see a damn thing until 15 times that $140 per person or $2100 per person.

Coming to a Ballot near you soon!

Vote Hell No!

Posted by: gs on July 24, 2008 06:51 PM
15. This is quite absurd. This situation is making lives of the people miserable. Increasing the gasoline rate alone makes a serous head ache for me. People who are driving every day office and other locations are fed up with this. Now what will be the economic position of the state after two or three years? Can anyone say that?
================================================================

Bobmike

Addiction Recovery Washington

Posted by: Bobmike on July 25, 2008 10:42 PM
16. This financial ambiguity hasn't stopped FRaudoire from making a campaign commercial about how rosy the budget is under her expert guidance.
Maybe if she just told the truth; that she's just going to ignore it and worry about it after she steals another election, people might not vote for her after all.

Posted by: Scott on July 26, 2008 12:16 AM
17. @1 I'm sure it's Bush's fault - well yes to a degree the current value of the dollar can be laid at the feet of a President who is devaluing the currency by sending out checks from the federal treasury disguised as a tax rebate - even when the checks are going to people who never paid federal taxes.

It is a simple case of government engaging in the wholesale printing of currency - and those involved trading in the currency markets have acknowledged as much.

This money was borrowed and placed into circulation without regard to the impact on the value of the dollar. The sad part is the common garden variety knot-head cannot equate part of the increase in the price of such imported goods as crude oil is in response to the dollars it is being purchased with being worth less.

So when John Q Knot-head turns back flips over his economic stimulus check he doesn't factor in that the impact of this money give away on retail prices and doesn't realize that there is a reason I have always said "if it's free, I cannot afford it" because there is always a catch involved and history has proven to me that the catch outweighs the free every time.

But then I do tend to favor looking at most offers using a long time horizon and using the catch as it relates to the value of the free offer as the deciding factor when evaluating these types of things.

Posted by: JDH on July 26, 2008 07:55 PM
18. penis enlargement pills
Do penis enlargement pills really work? Learn the real truth here. If you want to have better than the average penis size to satisfy women better then consider just4-sex.com

Posted by: PLELLAPUB on July 30, 2008 10:08 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?