KIRO-7 reports that Sound Transit and King County Metro are "skirting laws on lobbying and gifting", with hundreds of thousands of dollars of in donations over the years to charities and non-profit advocacy groups.
The Washington Policy Center's Mike Ennis has more on this, noting that Sound Transit's main beneficiary is the "Transportation Choices Coalition", which engages in "grassroots mobilization" on behalf of Sound Transit.
Ennis observes that
state law expressly prohibits public agencies from giving money to any organization unless a tangible good or service is provided in return.In Sound Transit's defense, is Astroturf a good or a service?
NOT ANOTHER PENNY TO SOUND TRANSIT.
(or frankly to these other corrupt "transit" groups)
Liberals are always trying to figure out new ways to use taxpayer dollars, instead of their own, to accomplish their personal goals.
Posted by: Michele on July 8, 2008 03:04 PMI guess that is why Congress, now led by Democrats for 2 years, today dropped to a 9% approval rating.
Read it here:
http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/congressional_performance/congressional_performance
Where's Al Gore to talk with John Ladenberg and weep over the tons of CO2 belched in to the atmosphere by those empty Sound Transit trains?
Also, why did the Sound Transit folks move the graffiti covered light rail car from the tracks near I-5 at SouthCenter? What about cultural sensitivity? Don't those taggers get their form of expression. It's sort of like there way of blogging. Often, DOT bureaucracies will build dedicated underpasses or overpasses for wildlife to cross freeways. Shouldn't Sound Transit leave that light rail car in place as a form of ghetto artistic expression of those taggers and build a new set of tracks around the car, or just use only one set of tracks in that section?
The left tells us this kind of thing all the time, but they are inconsistent with their message. How come its OK sometimes and not others? How come we are all supposed to drive smaller cars and wait for the wind, but it's OK for Barack Obama to drive in a big SUV and Al Gore to fly everywhere in his G5?
I mean someone really ought to look into the local and state governments relationship with KIRO radio. I can't believe how many government sponsored commercials run on that station and also on the evening newscasts. I'm sure they are not very anxious to upset their advertiser.
Posted by: johnny on July 8, 2008 04:50 PMI mean someone really ought to look into the local and state governments relationship with KIRO radio. I can't believe how many government sponsored commercials run on that station and also on the evening newscasts. I'm sure they are not very anxious to upset their advertiser.
Posted by: johnny on July 8, 2008 04:50 PMOk lib/dem's, have at this one.
Posted by: Army Medic/Vet on July 8, 2008 04:58 PMI'll give you that the engines are running because you roll your window down and hear them.
Posted by: BA on July 8, 2008 05:36 PMMarch to the Attorney General's office. Make noise. Clog the streets. Demand action. Make such a fuss that the msm has to say something, show something that is not in their best interests. Start a political brush fire.
Posted by: barrackslawyer on July 8, 2008 05:37 PMThe Public Disclosure Commission long ago (in 2001 or 2002) investigated these issues following a complaint from one of you right-wing ideologues and after reviewing the books of both the transit agencies and Transportation Choices Coalition, dismissed the complaint.
When initiative mongers and legislators are constantly trying to cut the little bit of remaining state revenue that goes to local transit agencies, or trying to limit their local funding options, it's reasonable for these agencies to participate in efforts to educate the public and legislators about the services they provide.
Posted by: BillL on July 8, 2008 05:51 PMPosted by: gs on July 8, 2008 06:10 PM
That doesn't mean there isn't an active organization to pass bonds and levies. And it doesn't mean that school employees can't work on it. It just means they have to do it on their own time and with their own money.
Why aren't other govt agencies as aware of the law as schools are?
Posted by: janet s on July 8, 2008 06:13 PMSmokie @18: the "B" in my last name is capitalized. Please get it right in the future.
Posted by: BillL on July 8, 2008 06:58 PMThis will slow up their agenda for expanding light rail for this November as voters will be less likely to buy what they are selling. Wasn't it King County (the perpetrator of corrupt elections) involved in giving ST its elevated status ?
Posted by: KS on July 8, 2008 07:43 PMYes, they can spend money to educate the public and legislators, but they cannot gift money to agencies in the form of sponsorships. You might want to ask the Port of Seattle about that.
Posted by: Michael H on July 8, 2008 08:41 PMMichael H@24: Neither Sound Transit nor any other transit agency has gifted money to Transportation Choices Coalition. Those agencies get something, something quite legal, in return. You could make a better argument that Sound Transit gifts something to the Susan G. Komen Foundation by running a special train (a train painted with a pink ribbon I'll add) to their annual 10k run.
Posted by: BillL on July 8, 2008 09:52 PMWhen I pointed to the waste of running two redundant ST services and ask that the waste be stopped Tacoma's resident hack Transportation Dirrector, named Kurtis Kingsolver came back with the retort that "every bus he sees traveling this route is full so we certainly don't agree with you that the practice is wasteful, besides people like choices." Yes the busses are full, but when I did the research I found out that the busses are full of people who board in the morning in Gig Harbor or Lakewood and are forced to ride through downtown Tacoma to pick up 1.6 passengers before heading to the Tacoma Dome and then on to Seattle. The process repeats itself in the reverse every evening.
This is just the proverbial "tip of the iceburg" though. It is just one example of what is wrong with ST.
Posted by: JDH on July 9, 2008 08:05 AM"A Working Families Credit for Washington State"
"On Point: Better Choices for Economic Security"
"House Budget Maintains Commitments but Misses Opportunity to Invest in Economic Security" by Jeff Chapman & Remy Trupin
"Governor's Budget: Important Investments, Long-Term Challenges" by Jeff Chapman & Remy Trupin
Their website is: www.budgetandpolicy.org
I am all about educating voters. www.blossforthe36th.com