July 02, 2008
Sonics stolen. Re-elect Dino Rossi

The Seattle SuperSonics have officially been stolen.

The City of Seattle has cut a deal with Clay Bennett and the Oklahoma City ownership group allowing the team to leave the Emerald City in exchange for the paltry sum of $45 million.

Basketball fans have been sold out by politicians that have allowed their team to be robbed without even putting up a fight.

Barring a miracle, or a victory by Howard Schultz with his litigation against the Sonics, the team is gone. During his press conference from OKC, Bennett has already stated the team begins its move tomorrow.

This is an example to every person who has even a passing knowledge of politics to understand why it is important to elect capable politicians. Politicians that care about the region where they live and who won't sell out their constituents for a bagful of silver and who'll put their political lives on the line rather than allowing a 41-year cultural institution to be snatched away in such an underhanded fashion.

Every Sonics fan that has watched this catastrophe unfold can point their fingers at a series of scoundrels: Democrat Greg Nickels, the Democrats on the Seattle City Council and the Democrats in the state legislature.

The first thing the Sonics fans can do to make their voices heard in a politically pragmatic manner is to punish Democratic governor Christine Gregoire who has shown no leadership on this issue. They can do so in November by voting for her opponent, Dino Rossi who has been more than ahead of the curve on this issue.

Posted by DonWard at July 02, 2008 05:05 PM | Email This
Comments
1. The Seattle SuperSonics have officially been stolen.

Ummm... last I checked, "stealing" involved taking something from the rightful owner against the owner's will. Howard Schultz was the rightful owner. He sold them to Bennett. Now Bennett, the rightful owner, is moving them.

I'm not saying Bennett isn't a shmuck... he is. But explain to me how the Sonics were "stolen"?

Sorry Don, but this isn't Green Bay. The Seattle Supersonics organization is a private company. You don't own them. The city didn't own them. Fans don't own them. Bennett does. The fact that you're a fan doesn't entitle you to decide where they will and won't play. Only the rightful owner gets to make that decision. And he wants them to play in OKC.

Posted by: Mike H on July 2, 2008 05:47 PM
2. Mike H,

"Now Bennett, the rightful owner, is moving them."

Excuse me? He is no rightful owner unless he made a "good faith" effort to keep the team. There was no "good faith" effort made by any means. He does not "rightfully" own the franchise.

The Sonics were stolen.

Posted by: Warren A on July 2, 2008 05:54 PM
3. I'm down here in Portland and I feel really sorry for you folks. I speak for all Blazers fans when I say we'll miss the I-5 rivalry between our two fine cities. You're welcome to support the Blazers but I understand if you want to avoid doing so.

F-k Bennett and f-k the NBA. It's only because we have Paul Allen that we're not in the same boat as you honestly.

Posted by: Don on July 2, 2008 06:00 PM
4. Warren,

If Schultz proves your argument in court, then yes, you're correct. But the burden of proof is on Schultz, not Bennett. As of right now, whether you like it or not, Bennett is the rightful owner.

Posted by: Mike H on July 2, 2008 06:00 PM
5. I can't really bring myself to care that much about the whole issue outside of the great parody material it provides, but I do have to agree with Warren A.

Everyone with half a brain knew as soon as the sale to Bennett's group was announced that they had no intention whatsoever of keeping the team in town. The emails that came to light during the court case prove that pretty plainly.

Posted by: The Tim on July 2, 2008 06:03 PM
6. Sonics leaving Seattle??

On the plus side, the crime rate will go down, fewer gas guzzling luxury cars......

On the down side....gee, I am drawing a blank...

Posted by: Hank on July 2, 2008 06:05 PM
7. Sorry Mike H, but you are mistaken.

The team has been stolen. That is the appropriate terminology. The Seattle SuperSonics are a unique cultural part of the region just like the Space Needle (which is also privately owned).

This is demonstrable just by the marketing that major league sports teams do themselves.

Every sports franchise brands itself as belonging to the fans. They aren't just A baseball team or A football team or A basketball team doing business in a given region.

They're YOUR Seattle Mariners, YOUR Seattle Seahawks, YOUR Seattle SuperSonics. You buy the clothing labels, trading cards, season tickets and watch on TV not because the team is just some abstract business but because the owners of the franchise want you to become personally invested in it.

It is a partnership between fans and the team. And it is a partnership that has been breached.

If you lived here, Mike, in the 1990s or the 1970s you know how important this team is to the region. Admittedly there are a lot of out-of-staters that have moved here since then who just don't get it.

Millions of local sports fans have a 41-year emotional (not to mention financial) investment in the Sonics. And to have that stolen from them in such a sordid manner is a crime.

The citizens of this region went through too much to get this franchise in the first place. Community leaders in this region invested too much in the 1960s to allow a bunch of nimrods (Democrats) running the local government now to get an easy cop-out here.

If you don't get that, well, I'm sorry.

Posted by: Don Ward on July 2, 2008 06:06 PM
8. This has implications for the governors race. Gregoire only had to approve an extension of a car rental and restaurant tax last year and we are not in this mess. Now we have an empty Key Arena, a loss of millions of dollars in tax revenue, hundreds of jobs lost and many, many, many pissed off sport fans who are absolutely laying into Gregoire on sports radio.

Posted by: jk on July 2, 2008 06:10 PM
9. It will be interesting to see what Seattle does with the money.

Will it be reinvested in Key Arena? Will it go towards luring another franchise?

Will it go towards stabilizing the number of police officers or prosecuting attorneys?

Will it go towards shoring up the financial position of Seattle Schools?

Or will it just go towards some politicians pet projects?

Posted by: SouthernRoots on July 2, 2008 06:14 PM
10. Don Ward:

Sonics important to this region? In what way? Oh my gosh......

Good Lord, the Sonics are these days nothing but NBA gang wannabe juvenile diliquents masquerading as entertainment.

Don, my man, obviously not a Seattle native; are you as indignant about the
Sonics fate as you are about the City of Seattle basically systematically driving the unlimited hydros out of Stan Sayres Pits for the benefit of a few dozen rowers??

The hydros put Seattle on the national sports map, for those of you fact, history and reality impaired, aka imports, liberal pantywaists.....

Oh, probably not....

If any sport has a Seattle heritage, it is hydroplanes, minor league Rainier baseball, Husky football, not necessarily in that order.

Sonics........bummer......jailbait......losers..

Posted by: Hank on July 2, 2008 06:20 PM
11. Don, Don, Don...

I'm with Mike H on this. They are only YOUR [name the entertainment company] because it is good marketing for the private firms to say so. Sells tickets, helps keep the tax subsidies alive, etc. It is standard, old school marketing - nothing more.

Hey, I'm a Pepper. He's a Pepper. She's a Pepper. You're a Pepper. I say we riot in the streets if the Doctor sells out to Mr. Pibb. We're Peppers gosh darn it. It's OUR high fructose, carbonated beverage!

When it comes down to it, I'm going to guess that the now defunct Sunset Bowl and Leilani Lanes contributed more in the way of direct affordable, family entertainment to the area than five tall guys running around in their underpants. Add to the mix other entertainment franchises like the Cinerama, any number of Lowes Theaters and Wild Waves. Would they be ours, too if the owners put that in a press release? C'mon Don.

The local sports entertainment franchises are not "ours." As a bitter blogger once wrote, "if you don't get that, well, I'm sorry..."


Posted by: airfoil on July 2, 2008 06:32 PM
12. Don, I've been here my entire life (30 years). The first twenty in Lynden, the last ten in King County. I remember the goods years in the '90s and the championship run then. I remember watching them whenever I could. But you know what? As I grew up, I realized something... it's just a bunch of guys playing basketball. Yes it was fun to watch. But it the grand scheme of things, it was just a distraction, nothing more. I get that the fans feel jipped, and frankly I don't blame them. I whole heartedly agree that Bennett is a shmuck. But at the end of the day... it's just a bunch of guys being paid a ton of money to play a game. Nothing more.

Sorry, but I don't hold some romanticized view of the team. I can't. I get that they're fun to watch. I get that a lot of people enjoy going to the games frequently. But to be outraged that you're somehow being "robbed" is just plain silly to me.

Posted by: Mike H on July 2, 2008 06:38 PM
13. I see your points Don, but I think they are dated. I think the Sonics *were* important to this region. Today's Elitist Progressive Belletown Urban Condo culture Seattle is far removed from the laid back Seattle culture of the 70s and 80s.

And the NBA's culture of the 70s and 80s where players stayed with the teams and were a part of the community is long gone as well. I remember bumping in to Trailblazer players and their families at the breakfast hangout in Portland on Sundays. They were friendly and engaged with the community.

Now, the NBA's product has declined to a deplorable state. Players don't care too much about the game or their teams. And with that, so has the interest of many of the fans. I use to be an avid NBA fan, now I could care less. NCAA action is far better basketball.

Interesting times we live in.

Posted by: Jeff B. on July 2, 2008 06:39 PM
14. Airfoil,

Considering that the Seattle Coliseum was built by the citizens of Seattle to attract an NBA franchise and considering that the Coliseum was renovated by the citizens of Seattle to keep aforementioned NBA franchise in town does give the citizens in this region a vested fiduciary role in the ownership of Sonics.
Not to mention the millions of man hours invested by local fans supporting this franchise. This makes the Sonics quite a bit different business modle than the Sunset Bowl and Leilani Lanes.
But then I can argue that rain is wet to someone who believes rain to be dry.

Hank,

Third and fourth generation Washingtonian here. My great-great grandfather was the minister for the downtown First United Methodist Church.

When did you move here? Now that our who is a real Northwesterner bonafides are in order, why are you on the same side of the same, out of state liberal pussies that got rid of the hydros again? Because they're the same out of state liberal pussies that want to get rid of the Sonics.

Posted by: Don Ward on July 2, 2008 06:42 PM
15. Oh, and lest this topic get too off track. And it gets back on track right now. (Ahem)

All of you "Go Sonics and take the Mariners with you" folks. Why are you so eager to join up with the Democrats in Seattle and Olympia that have fought so hard to kick Sonics out of town.

Does it seem at all strange that you happen to be on the same side of the coin as the Greg Nickels, Nick Licatas and Frank Chopps of the world and are at odds with Republicans like Dino Rossi, Steve Pyeatt, Slade Gorton and Pete Von Reichbauer?

Posted by: Don Ward on July 2, 2008 06:48 PM
16. And what's the whole BS club levels, suites, and all of the garbage circus side shows and marketing? I remember growing up and going to Blazer games. There was one concession level at the coliseum. Everyone mingled together and ate the same food. The enthusiasm was for the team, and not for a mascot, dancers, or the fancy the parking and stadium amenities.

Pro sports are so corporate that the strong team oriented fans and players, family values and reasonable pricing that built the kind of loyalty that is in Don's words has been destroyed. Now all you see are corporate functions renting blocks of seats where people are there because they got free tix. And there are so many BS promotions and stupid songs playing, childish videos on the jumbotron, etc. It's all a distraction and you get the sense that the players are just there for the show. They rarely play hard the whole game. And many of them have severely dysfunctional attitudes and personal lives. The role models are gone, replaced by thugs.

It's not about the sport anymore, but all of the surrounding junk. So the type of fan that is now attracted to the venue is either the see-and-be-seen rich white liberal with the trophy wife who leaves early, or the ghetto punks that worship the players for all of the wrong reasons.

Let it go Don. It will come back when enough fans just stay home and economics force change.

Edit note by DW- Jeff. You are factual incorrect about family friendly ticket prices and have fallen for the propaganda. I can't let your statement be.
At Key Arena there are seats from $10 to $25. You might sneer that they're "upper level" but having sat there a time or few, they're pretty damn good seats. This is one of the reasons why Key Arena, contrary to the argument, is such a great place to watch NBA basketball.
http://www.nba.com/media/sonics/07_08_sonics_pricing.pdf

Oh, and voting out Democrats and not economics will force the change...

Posted by: Jeff B. on July 2, 2008 06:51 PM
17. Don Ward says:

"They're YOUR Seattle Mariners, YOUR Seattle Seahawks, YOUR Seattle SuperSonics. You buy the clothing labels, trading cards, season tickets and watch on TV not because the team is just some abstract business but because the owners of the franchise want you to become personally invested in it.

It is a partnership between fans and the team. And it is a partnership that has been breached."

We're forgetting a few of the other "partners." There are the owners -- you know, the people who pay the players' exhorbitant salaries so they can entertain the fans. There are the politicians --they're the people who are supposed to promote the city's interests by providing state-of-the-art facilities so that the owners can make a sufficient return on their investment to incentivize them to remain in the city.

Americas are learning some hard lessons. Auto workers no longer have the "right" to earn $50.00 per hour installing fenders when people in other parts of the world are willing to perform the same work at a fraction of the cost. If another city, or state, or country offered Microsoft, or Boeing, or even Starbucks, enormous tax or other incentives to move their headquarters or opertations, they would leave in a heartbeat, despite their "partnership" with the city and its residents.

Posted by: Sonicsfan on July 2, 2008 06:53 PM
18. Don - last I saw, Slade was pulling down $600+ per hour to love the Sonics.

Posted by: airfoil on July 2, 2008 06:59 PM
19. And to answer the question, yeah, I agree the Progressives have created the hedonistic NBA Hollywood culture and the worship of the circus side shows and the amenities. But until Seattle and WA wakes up and votes these idiots out en masse, I'm not losing and sleep or investing any emotion in all of the cultural icons they are destroying. Because it's not worth any personal investment at this point.

The underlying philosophy of the region is collective, Progressive and broken. Until that gets fixed, all bets are off.

So yeah, vote Rossi, and maybe we can start to turn it around. But don't get attached to the garbage that now passes for Seattle culture. I spend my dollars and my emotional investment on the few things that are still functional in the region. I seek them out, and it's a lot more gratifying than the empty feeling one gets after viewing any of today's Progressive entertainment.

Posted by: Jeff B. on July 2, 2008 06:59 PM
20. Here's the down side, and I caught it in today's Mayor Nichol's press conference. He is holding the 2009 legislature, already facing a 2.7 billion dollar overspending spree debt, hostage.

He says they must approve the massive tax hikes for a new stadium.

But what I heard him say was he was going to start spending the 45 million on a Seattle Center renovation, so the way he spends it will be gone in no time, cause 45 million is chump change to that dude, and he won't get the other 30 million unless they approve a spending plan which the will do even though they know it will not see the light of day for a Basketball team or arena. But it will get the other 30 million delivered and that will give Nichols 75 million for part of his renovation, and the OK to build a new stadium, but no team will be gotten.

It's very carefully worded to force the legislature to spend another Billion or so in Seattle.

Posted by: gs on July 2, 2008 07:01 PM
21. OK, fair enough on the pricing Don. But that's only the case because the Arena is mostly empty. They'd rather put someone in the seats for a few bucks. But most families don't see a whole lot of things at the Arena that they'd like their kids exposed to and that's on reason why the place is empty.

For my money, I'd much rather take the family to a Rainier's game where we can sit right up close for the same price or less. There's a lot less pretension, and baseball seems to be a lot less affected by the meltdown of American pro sports, and it still maintains a modicum of sportsmanship and standards amongst the players and traditions.

And I'm not saying get rid of the Mariners. Only that the Sonics and the NBA are a bad apple.

Posted by: Jeff B. on July 2, 2008 07:11 PM
22. Someone brought up Slade Gordon. OMG did this guy screw up or what, WTF was he thinkin? He did more to get rid of the Sonics than any combination of any others. This guy is inept and should stay the f*** out of anything having to do with Seattle.
Slade, can say RETIRE! Then DO IT and with some finality.
Folks in OKC are LTAO at all of this amateurism going on in Seattle. We don't deserve a professional team, we're like bush league. My money is on Seattle NEVER getting another pro basketball team. Enjoy the Storm folks because that's all we're going to get. The NBA doesn't like us, our mayor, our legislature, our politicians, period. Shultz has enough to worry about with Sbucks stock tanking than to continue a stupid law suit. It makes him look like more of an idiot than he really is. Bye-bye professional basketball...with the rights to the name, logo, colors, etc...and a few bucks you can buy a latte at Starbucks. What a FRICKIN FARCE! GOOD RIDDANCE TO ALL OF YOU PRIMA DONNAS!!!

Posted by: Dave on July 2, 2008 07:27 PM
23. This is a sad day. I am starting to hate this state. My family and I enjoyed the Sonics games. The $10 seats were good. The kids could yell as loud as they wanted up there and we could see the game perfectly. The atmosphere was very family friendly. Kids could get face painting and pictures taken with Squatch.

The people complaining about ticket prices must not go to games, if you did you would know that they always had family specials and kids could get soda and hot dog for a buck.

I understand that if you are not a sports fan, you may not have much sympathy; but having a professional sports teams is one aspect that makes Seattle a world class place to live and visit. Today Seattle and all of Washington State slipped a little closer to becomming a dull, second-rate state.

Posted by: Whole Lotta Rosie on July 2, 2008 07:32 PM
24. Hey folks, no Sonics will mean less congestion the nights they would have played a home game! I have thought you'd be dancing in the (emptier) streets about that.

Posted by: Daniel K on July 2, 2008 07:43 PM
25. and not to mention more room in our jails.

Posted by: Rembrant on July 2, 2008 07:46 PM
26. @15; All of you "Go Sonics and take the Mariners with you" folks. Why are you so eager to join up with the Democrats in Seattle and Olympia that have fought so hard to kick Sonics out of town.

Does it seem at all strange that you happen to be on the same side of the coin as the Greg Nickels, Nick Licatas and Frank Chopps of the world and are at odds with Republicans like Dino Rossi, Steve Pyeatt, Slade Gorton and Pete Von Reichbauer?

So let me get this straight. Increasing your taxes and essentially handing the extra revenue to a *private* business is okay? Geez. You guys would cut off your noses to spite your face... are you only opposed to all of this because liberals are taking the position that fiscal conservatives should be taking here?

Posted by: demo kid on July 2, 2008 07:50 PM
27. Don at #15
He states to the effect 'isn't it strange that we all are on the side of Nickels, Licatas, and Chopp'. He is correct, it is true that the conservative leadership is sometimes backwards in this state. But as a conservative, I will definitely side with my opponents if they are correct on an issue. Today is a day to celebrate! Put our priorities back on track. Isn't there a group out there called citizens for more important things. I side with them. Not one dime of tax money should go to pro sports teams.

Posted by: keepitreal on July 2, 2008 07:54 PM
28. Yeah, elect Dino Rossi so he can try to bring back a gang of over paid pro-basketball wannabes who could care less about the game, the community or themselves. True basketball is played at a lower level where $money is not such a factor. Pro basketball is a farce and I congratulate the mayor, city council, legislature and all our irrelevent politicians for helping the City get rid of these fakers.
Let's rejoice and be thankful that Portland is now solely responsible for the jail-blazers.

Posted by: hshultzsmom on July 2, 2008 07:54 PM
29. Go Sonics and take the Mariners with you.

Posted by: Not a Fan on July 2, 2008 08:12 PM
30. I am a Blazer fan also, They used to be the Jail blazers but got rid of the cause of the transformation; Seattle white trash, Bob Whitsitt, and got a quality coach in Nate McMillan and a decent front office and are back to respectibility. Sorry about the feckless politicians lame attempt to revive the Sonics, but its really Howard Schultz who opened the door for Bennett. Nickels is a clown for giving up so little and Gregoire showed no leadership, which isn't all bad because it is outrageous for the public to subsidize multimillionaire owners and players. Maybe Seattle will land another team that is a better team than left. When they do, I'd hope there would be a different set of politicians who are not spineless metrosexual males, but instead with steel cuevos.

Dino Rossi doesn't really figure into this situation, but nevertheless he is the candidate who will bring accountability back to State Government, which the current Gov. is good at finger pointing but not at taking responsibility for her faults. For those reasons, I vote to reelect Rossi for the third time in two elections and hopefully the third time will be the charm !

Posted by: KS on July 2, 2008 08:21 PM
31. What's the carbon footprint of an NBA team?

Posted by: Smoley on July 2, 2008 08:41 PM
32. Drat, Not A Fan stole my line from a previous thread.

"They're YOUR Seattle Mariners [nope], YOUR Seattle Seahawks [nope], YOUR Seattle SuperSonics [nope]. You buy the clothing labels [nope], trading cards [nope], season tickets [nope!!!] and watch on TV [not really] not because the team is just some abstract business [yep] but because the owners of the franchise want you to become personally invested in it [yep, a sucker's born every minute]."


Posted by: ItTakesAVillageToConveneAGrandJury on July 2, 2008 08:43 PM
33. If our politicians cut the Sonics owners the same deal that they cut Boeing...we would still have a Basketball team...but with a $2 Billion and growing deficit...the money was not their.

We should thank our leaders...by losing the Sonics, we will have more money to pay teachers, more funds for the Homeless, raises for State Employees.

Remember letting the Sonics go is...

"For Our Children"

Posted by: Pacific Grove Phlash on July 2, 2008 09:22 PM
34. What about the free market? I doubt Dino Rossi would have wanted an 80% taxpayer funded facility so that Clay Bennet could flip the team.

Posted by: JC on July 2, 2008 09:40 PM
35. Rossi's position on the Sonics is why I will never support him again.

Tax subsidies to sports teams? There's nothing genuinely Republican about that.

Posted by: hinton on July 2, 2008 09:42 PM
36. I'm thinking the economic impact will hurt local restaurants but hard pressed to come up with anything else. Oh yeah...There's a few traffic cops going to lose out on about 40 some games of overtime/traffic control.

Posted by: PC on July 2, 2008 09:42 PM
37. Danny K can't respect Don Ward's post because he hadn't even learned to masturbate yet when fans and sportsmanship still meant something in Seattle.

Posted by: Jeff B. on July 2, 2008 09:56 PM
38. "Rossi's position on the Sonics is why I will never support him again."

What was his position- I don't believe he said definitively he would use taxpayer money to subsidize them, even though he may have postured for them staying. That is a weak reason for switching to Gregoire, given her dirty laundry list...

Slade Gorton would have supported public financing, just as he did for the Mariner stadium back in 1996.

Posted by: KS on July 2, 2008 09:57 PM
39. Nobody would have given Bennett 500 million dollars for a building and he knew it. What Rossi would have done is authorized the extension of the current car rental tax that pays for Safeco and Qwest field in the amount of 75 million. Why? Because 75 million is a tiny amount to pay for hundreds of jobs, millions of dollars in sales tax revenues and it would have saved a number of businesses around Queen Anne. This is called a wise investment, something none of the current crowd knows anything about. The leadership was given a gift by Steve Ballmer and his group to keep this team here and pay for HALF of the Key arena renovation, the city was going to pay half and Gregoire blew it big time.....

Posted by: jk on July 2, 2008 10:26 PM
40. The Sonics PBC has/had a lot of things wrong, but one thing they did get right is that for all purposes no one cares if the Sonics leave.
You'll see, all these politicians will be re-elected and the Seattle newspapers will not lose any significant circulation due to their editorials.

Posted by: seePea on July 2, 2008 10:30 PM
41. Gregoire has lost votes over this in a big way. Some Democrat partisans I know who are Democrats like they are Sonics fans will be voting Rossi for sure this fall. So that's at least 8 votes that flip Greoire to Rossi.

Posted by: Kingdome on July 2, 2008 10:44 PM
42. "Considering that the Seattle Coliseum was built by the citizens of Seattle to attract an NBA franchise and considering that the Coliseum was renovated by the citizens of Seattle to keep aforementioned NBA franchise in town does give the citizens in this region a vested fiduciary role in the ownership of Sonics."

Nope. It means that decades of sincere support from Seattle was ignored by a greedy owner. Seattle repeatedly paid to keep the Sonics here, and the owner just demanded more. That's not a partnership, it's an abusive marriage, and the abuser just left. (The victim will fell more relieved after the abuser really does not return.)

Seattle's voters recently required that any sports partnership actually produce a decent rate of return for their city. That's called good fiscal responsibility, and it's amusing to see a "conservative" blog complain about such prudence.

Posted by: tensor on July 2, 2008 11:04 PM
43. Ok and you expected what when an outatowner bought it?? Howie and Co. sure tried hard to peddle it locally (eyes roll). Clay bought it and we expected what....a terminal death in 2010 or now?

not a cent for the Coliseum!!!!!!! Let Key Bank fix it up...it just was spiffed a "few" years ago.

Nothing...nothing....nothing ZZZZEROOOO $... State Legislature..ya hear. Oh wait right I am zip zero nada in today's politics.

Does Howard Shultz have a DWI like Richard Petty...Only if Frank Chopp SEZ So to kill a deal when we are $2.3 BILLION upside down. Or will the $300 Million Flow like water for 12 "Dudes" and NASCAR reeled from being kicked in the head and hard.

Posted by: Col. Hogan on July 2, 2008 11:24 PM
44. Have you EVER heard of a liberal who would turn down $45M? Ok, the Teachers Union came close turning down Bill Gate's millions because of a "performance clause" but really, everyone has a price. Bennett found the right amount to buy off the liberal Seattle government. End of story.

Posted by: Scott on July 3, 2008 12:43 AM
45. Sorry, Don, but I have to agree with #42.

Seems very republican to let the business owner move their business wherever the heck they want to, and I've never understood why the government is paying for stadiums. Don't we have important infrastructure to worry about?

Posted by: Cassie on July 3, 2008 01:38 AM
46. Sorry, Don, but I have to agree with #42.

Seems very republican to let the business owner move their business wherever the heck they want to, and I've never understood why the government is paying for stadiums. Don't we have important infrastructure to worry about?

Posted by: Cassie on July 3, 2008 01:51 AM
47. It's amazing to me that you 'conservatives' want government to get involved to keep a sports team here.

Hypocrisy is fun

Posted by: Andrew Brown on July 3, 2008 07:53 AM
48. Rossi's position: http://theseattlesupersonics.blogspot.com/2008/03/dino-rossi-supports-key-arena-fwd-tell.html

I'm not switching to Gregoire. I'll be sitting this one out.

No matter how tax dollars are collected, unless they're collected as a result of a vote of the people, I cannot support any candidate who advocates utilizing tax dollars to subsidize pro sports. Of any kind.

Rossi's advocacy of using tens of millions of dollars for a non-public purpose is just one of the reasons why he's going to lose (And he IS going to lose) because we have yet to grasp the fact that we cannot win in this state by out-democrating the democrats.

Posted by: hinton on July 3, 2008 08:00 AM
49. AB, true conservatives would be appalled at this type of taxpayer abuse. There's nothing "conservative" about advocates of wasting hundreds of millions of dollars for pro sports... thus, nothing "hypocritical" about the rabid response to the loss of this team.

Posted by: hinton on July 3, 2008 08:04 AM
50. This does suck.

Now I won't be able to see my World Champion Boston Celtics play in Seattle.

Posted by: pudge on July 3, 2008 08:08 AM
51. they should re-name this blog WAAAAAAAH Politics. You right wingers are some whiney mo-fos. No, you are not entitled to watch sports are tax payer expense. Now go whine about something else.

Posted by: Just Me on July 3, 2008 08:39 AM
52. Pudge@50,

As a Swedish-German-Russian American, I am highly offended by the use of "Celtics" to name a sports team. Please try to be a little more politically correct in the future. : )

Posted by: NW Denizen on July 3, 2008 08:43 AM
53. 51. I know some liberal Democrats who are whining about this too. We need to restructure the dominant political parties to include Democrats, Republicans, and Sports Fanatics. Mention the word "ball", or "puck" to a Sports Fanatic and all common sense goes out the window, and you get a regurgitation of every sports statictic clear back to when Belerophons killed Cupido in the Coliseum in ancient Rome way back when. I think, with these folks, it's something akin to the Pavlov's dog phenomenon.

Posted by: NW Denizen on July 3, 2008 09:04 AM
54. NW Denizen:

Have you ever been to Boston? There's a lot of actual Celtics there, especially around Southie, and they don't seem to mind. :-)

Anyway, speaking of Boston, they don't do public funding of their sports teams. Public money poisons things.

Posted by: pudge on July 3, 2008 09:19 AM
55. This is quite unbelievable. Putative conservatives chastising Democrats because the government didn't do enough to interfere in the business decisions of a private business. Yet, you know, when it comes to giving homeowners recourse against builder fraud, this blog stands 100% opposed.

I don't get it.

Posted by: cpk on July 3, 2008 09:24 AM
56. 1 down, 2 to go.

The only thing sports businesses do for me is raise my taxes (which are already 5 times too high). Therefore they make me mad as hell and I'm glad to see them go.

Posted by: GoodRiddance on July 3, 2008 11:11 AM
57. Pudge,

Nope, I have never been to Boston. Maybe someday. I think it would be an interesting place to visit. No, I have never heard of anyone being offended by "The Fighting Irish" either. Political correctness is baloney.

Posted by: NW Denizen on July 3, 2008 11:23 AM
58. Pro sports are like the arts. They enhance the culture of a city. Are they absolutlely needed? No, there are many cities that do not have pro sports. Would I want to live in them? No. A part of our culture has been taken from us and we the citizens got nothing in return for it. Something overlooked here is that the Sonics also generated $180M annually in revenue for the local economy. The fact that Nickels didn't stick to his guns or his rhetoric and settled for pennies on the dollar as opposed to holding the team to the lease it signed just shows how spineless and ineffective he is as a leader.

Posted by: Mike on July 3, 2008 01:44 PM
59. They were not stolen. The OWNERS decided to move the team.

Thankfully Gregoire did not give in to political pressure from 'small government??' rossi to steal more money from taxpayers to try and keep the team here.

Today is a victory for citizens opposed to corporate subsidies!

Posted by: Lysander on July 3, 2008 05:02 PM
60. "It will be interesting to see what Seattle does with the money."

To properly commemorate the event and those who brought it about, I think they should spend the money on a whole bunch of automatic toilets, called "The Gregoire/Nichols Sonics Memorial Auto-Crapper Network".

Posted by: scott on July 3, 2008 06:29 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?