June 27, 2008
Like 8th grade girls at a Bow Wow Concert

Charles Krauthammer on the free pass that the mainsteam media is giving to the constant flip-flopping of the Ever-Malleable Mr. Obama:

I merely note with amazement that his media swooners seem to accept his every policy reversal with an equanimity unseen since the Daily Worker would change the party line overnight -- switching sides in World War II, for example -- whenever the wind from Moscow changed direction.
Krauthammer is giving the Obamist media too much credit. They have all the intellectual and professional seriousness of a bunch of 8th grade girls at a Bow Wow Concert.

In light of all the credulous reporting and boosterist editorials about the Obamessiah, how much of this tidbit of a political reporter's inner thought process is lame parody and how much is a fair paraphrasing of what we've been reading all year?:

Obama has sex appeal! and he's not a Republican! and it would be such a nice testament to our country's progress if we elected a descendant of slaves to be President! Oh wait, he's not descended from slaves, but he looks like the descendents of slaves and he goes to their church, so that's close enough. And he's not a Republican and he's young and cool and the young people like him and they're cool and they're our future! And if I write nice things about Obama, they'll let me cover his campaign rallies, where I can hang out with all these young people and maybe get to interview Scarlet Johanssen! Who cares if his plans for the economy would make us more like Europe with a constipated labor market and high youth unemployment and even more severely unsustainable social welfare programs that will be paid for by today's young people? They don't know that. The only college kids who pay attention in econ class are in B-school and they're all Republicans. Obamas' youth are the hip ones, and they're our future! And they're my future! I'm counting on them to pay for my nursing home and health care when I'm 88 so I can retire early and not have to save as much. So just keep reporting how much the young people like Obama, because they like to do what's popular. And we need them to buy our newspapers. And think how much it would improve our image in the world to have a black President named Barack Hussein Obama! The French will cooperate with us again. Just like when Lyndon Johnson was President! And the Muslim world will like us again! Just like when Jimmy Carter was President! And the Canadians and the South Koreans will like us again and they'll give Obama what he wants when he renegotiates their trade agreements. Just scratch that reference to Hussein. I don't want to give any fodder to the Republican Attack Machine...

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at June 27, 2008 12:08 PM | Email This
Comments
1. And McCain is any better? Hardly.

Posted by: demo kid on June 27, 2008 12:06 PM
2. Right, demo kid, McCain isn't any better, but he is a lot less bad. Either way, it's going to be a rough ride under our next (one-term) president.

Posted by: deedub on June 27, 2008 12:12 PM
3. @2: The guy can't find his ass with both hands, and doesn't present any sort of coherent direction. Say what you want about Obama being an "empty suit", but if this guy weren't tortured by the NVA during the war, he wouldn't have a chance of being voted in now.

Posted by: demo kid on June 27, 2008 12:17 PM
4. Well summarized, Stephan. You haven't lost your touch like you thought. Excellent, excellent comments.

To augment, I just have to go with my ultra-left e-mail buddies. They don't seem to mind the flip-flopping and emptiness of the DalaiBama. They send me, in response, articles of how the Great One can hold two consciousnesses in one hand, like that great philosopher, Garrison Keillor, and like the Body Jesse on a recent talk show. It is that they can communicate to the working folk. They don't seem to mind him abandoning their Iraq issue or whatever the issue dujour is, because McCain is the evil one's third term and things will be worse if McCain won the election. They yell at me (i.e. capital letters) that at least he is intelligent enough that he can change his mind.

There is absolutely nothing to change the mindset, except one of the two thinks he and I are joined at the hip with respect to politics. I go, huh?

Posted by: swatter on June 27, 2008 12:34 PM
5. @4: Wow... you must have liberal friends that are as mentally challenged and as willing to blindly follow their leader as you are.

Of course, none of this is any indication of how people are completely dissatisfied with the false promises of the GOP, and are ready for a dramatic change, right?

Posted by: demo kid on June 27, 2008 01:56 PM
6. Ahhh Demo kid.

Well you just may look at the ratings for the dems who control congress.
Try the lowest numbers of all time.

So you really want to work on that "mental" thing!

Posted by: Army Medic/Vet on June 27, 2008 02:09 PM
7. You think this guy is the dufus, reincarnated, or one of the Ronulan's new disguises?

At a straight split along presidential lines with Gallup and Times polls (typical D leaning), I don't see how anyone can predict the outcome in June, Medic. Do you?

Notice, also, the topic change because of nothing to add on the topic? Must indicate an agreement on topic.

Posted by: swatter on June 27, 2008 02:18 PM
8. "Not a flinch. Not a flicker. Not a hint of shame. By the time he's finished, Obama will have made the Clintons look scrupulous."

Great line.

Anyone see the hil/bama air kiss? Can anyone actually be surprised? SHE, who can forgive Bill of any trespass and stay with him?

Fence mending and preparing for the next politically motivated move...

Historians will well note this generations' "divine right of the Clintons."

It can only be speculation as to what the endgame of hil/bama is, but clearly we are witnessing the gathering of some sort of critical mass beyond which it is uncertain whether or not the greater public good will retain any leverage against blatant factional pandering. After watching this pair on stage and seeing Gregoire's performance in WA, it's difficult to see this trend as anything other than naked corruption thinly veiled under the guise of hardball electioneering. Once character traits such as honesty and integrity are effectively removed from a major faction's mission statement, the very basis of public good is at risk.

And thank you, Stefan for both the post and the reference to Econ, which is one of my frequent criticisms of the left.

Posted by: scott158 on June 27, 2008 02:18 PM
9. @6: So you really want to work on that "mental" thing!

Let's see... enough Republicans for filibusters and not enough Democrats for a veto-proof majority. Gridlock doesn't exist because the Democrats are in control... it exists because there aren't enough Democrats in control.

A problem soon rectified, however.

Posted by: demo kid on June 27, 2008 03:17 PM
10. @6
Well you just may look at the ratings for the dems who control congress. Try the lowest numbers of all time.

And you may also want to note that it has higher approval ratings from Republicans than Democrats to get a better understanding of why.

Posted by: thehim on June 27, 2008 03:59 PM
11. I see the GOP is finally getting a battle plan in place: Reintroduce the Federal Marriage Amendment.

Really? You think Americans will fall for that crap again? And to top it off two of the sponsors on this tasty piece of legislation are Larry Craig and David Vitter. Literally laughing out loud.

Posted by: Splinter on June 27, 2008 04:00 PM
12. This country seems to have about a 90% record of picking the wrong guy at the very worst times in our history. One notable exception was Ronald Reagan. The current pair is wrong no matter who you pick. Right - McCain is "less bad" than Obama, and maybe we have to go there to let people see how bad it can get. But the two lasting things that will be left behind by Obama is the Supreme Court; which just came within a single vote of taking our guns away no matter what the Second Amendmnet says, and some debacle of a health care system which will be bankrupt the day it's enacted and be just like Canada's system which is in complete collapse.
With McCain we have someone who is all about all the stupid Algore Global Warming hoax and Cap and Trade, which will pretty much cripple our economy and quite probably double the price of gas.
So, that's where we are. Dumb and dummer. Who do you pick?

Posted by: Scott on June 27, 2008 04:48 PM
13. OOOO Belivev me "KID" In many ways I want you guys to win. Because in less than 2 or 4 years Americans will be SO tired of you. My-O-my how you forget the Cater & Clinton days when the rep/con to over and we got out of these problems.

So laugh now and we shall see who laughs later.
Remeber one thing, you GUYS think gov can fix it all. Yeah well so did Stalin. I can laugh now.
(again that is)

Posted by: Army Medic/Vet on June 27, 2008 07:41 PM
14. wow sorry everyone

Many words are missing from what I wrote?
The system took a LONG time before I got thru???

Posted by: Army Medic/Vet on June 27, 2008 08:01 PM
15. @13: Ahh yes. When all else fails, blame Stalin! Truly the tactic of an argumentative coward...

Posted by: demo kid on June 27, 2008 08:42 PM
16. Hey, dummo kid, too bad you aren't bright enough to understand the future implications of what you wish for. Twenty years from now, when you're all grown up, you'll be saying, "I voted for those losers?"

Posted by: Saltherring on June 28, 2008 06:32 AM
17. Saltherring:

"Twenty years from now, when you're all grown up, you'll be saying, "I voted for those losers?""

Since I voted for GWB, that moment's come a lot sooner for me.

Posted by: Zeeb on June 28, 2008 10:31 AM
18. 15. "Ahh yes. When all else fails, blame Stalin!..."
Posted by demo kid at June 27, 2008 08:42 PM

...well, "uncle Joe" is the blueprint for what
B-uh-rack Obam-uh envisions for this country. He's just too cowardly to admit it.

Posted by: Rick D. on June 28, 2008 12:33 PM
19. @18: ...well, "uncle Joe" is the blueprint for what
B-uh-rack Obam-uh envisions for this country. He's just too cowardly to admit it.

Again... proving my point! You betray your ignorance of both history and politics. That's like saying that Mussolini is the style that McCain wants to enact for this country.

Posted by: demo kid on June 28, 2008 02:45 PM
20. @ 19 Obama is a Neo-Marxist. Perhaps you aren't intelligent enough to grasp that concept, but that's a fact...and by the way, you've never proven any point, you've only accentuated your own ignorace of history.

Posted by: Rick D. on June 29, 2008 10:08 AM
21. what is this

Posted by: justice on June 29, 2008 02:28 PM
22. what is this

Posted by: justice on June 29, 2008 02:28 PM
23. @19: A "neo-Marxist"? Might as well call him a crypto-fascist to boot. Idiots like you throw the "Marxist" label around so much, it's effectively lost its meaning.

Posted by: demo kid on June 29, 2008 03:26 PM
24. If you read and understand Marx, you'd know that Marx (with a splash of Keynes) IS the foundation for modern left-wing economic thought. Especially now that the Democrats have fully embraced this dumbed down populist rhetoric, which dovetails perfectly with the class war they're trying to incite. Gore moaned about the "wealthiest one percent," Kerry got worked up about the Enron folk, and now Obama talks about hedge funds executives (even though they give him beaucoup $). It's all variations on a theme: "All of your problems can be pinned on the bad, bad, wealthy, bad people--because they have more money and you have less, so they must have taken it from you!!!"

Posted by: AD on June 29, 2008 05:35 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?