June 26, 2008
The Hit on Rossi Has a Twist

Dino Rossi's campaign sent out a press release today announcing that the coming Evergreen Progress PAC ad campaign against their guy is expected to begin tomorrow with a round of TV ads. While making that announcement, they make an interesting point: conflict of interest again abounds for Christine Gregoire.

Specifically, $495,000 $545,000 of the PAC's $1.1+ million kitty is from the SEIU Washington State Council. Concurrently, Gregoire's administration is tasked with completing negotiations for pay and benefits on four contracts affecting SEIU members by October 1 of this year:

1) Home health care workers - SEIU 775
2) In home child care workers - SEIU 925
3) Nurses in state institutions - SEIU 1199
4) Classified staff in higher Ed institutions (PSE/SEIU)

The Washington Federation of State Employees has also contributed another $200,000 to the PAC in the midst of their own contract negotiations with the state.

The impression of a conflict of interest is obvious. More so on the heels of the Seattle P-I and the Seattle Times digging into the strong appearance of connections between high dollar contributions and public policy.

Now, I'll argue until I'm blue in the face that maximum individual contributions of a couple thousand bucks to a multi-million dollar campaign are small potatoes. A fair argument can even be made the six figure donations to state parties and PACs doesn't mean the interest group or entity in question will actually secure their favored public policy in the future - a disconnect that happens more often than campaign finance reform zealots recognize or care to admit.

But, the sum of the news coverage in question and the large-scale involvement of public sector unions with current business before state government is an obvious optical problem. Moreover, whatever the truth of such political machinations - which is inevitably challenging to divine in full - this does not pass a smell test with the general public.

In a year where being perceived as part of the status quo is most definitely not a good thing, a growing narrative of public policy favors for big ticket campaign cash is not exactly ideal.

If you wanted to place any bet on what a Republican Governor's Association ad campaign against Gregoire might focus in later this year, this whole topic might not be a bad horse to pick.

UPDATE: link added.

Posted by Eric Earling at June 26, 2008 09:33 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Don't blame the casino tribes, they made a good business decision. Pay Gregoire's campaign hundreds of thousands, maybe millions in exchage for Gregoire overrulling her own Gambling commission so they avoid paying $140 million a year to the state. Same thing here SEIU and the state employees union pay hundreds of thousands to keep Gregoire in office and in exchange she give them hundreds of millions of tax dollars. Same story - second verse. Governor for sale. Governor who puts her own re-election above the interests of the people who depend on state services and the taxpayers.

Posted by: homer on June 26, 2008 10:44 PM
2. Genius! Harp on SEIU, and ignore the BIAW. Do you seriously believe that Rossi isn't going to be quite receptive to them if he were to ever luck out and get into the head office?

Typical. Love that double standard that's so endemic amongst conservatives.

Posted by: demo kid on June 26, 2008 11:07 PM
3. dk, YOUR hypocrisy, like that of most leftists, reeks.

Rossi MIGHT get elected. He MIGHT give the BIAW some payback for their support.

Queen Chrissy the Liar IS our governor; she IS in negotiations with these scum, and she WILL pay them off for their support, PRECISELY like she paid off the tribes to the tune of $140 million taxpayer dollars for THEIR support.

Your situational ethics, like that of that criminal running this state, are despicable.

Posted by: Hinton on June 26, 2008 11:30 PM
4. BIAW is independent business people running primarily construction related businesses. They look out for member issues. Membership is optional.

SEIU REQUIRES all members to pay dues that are used against them if they disagree with SEIU policies.

The pathetic comparison by the corrupt Democrats does not pass the straight face test.

Christine Gregoire - GOVERNOR FOR SALE!

Posted by: zDawg on June 26, 2008 11:31 PM
5. Genius! Harp on SEIU, and ignore the BIAW. Do you seriously believe that Rossi isn't going to be quite receptive to them if he were to ever luck out and get into the head office?

At least the BIAW doesn't resort to violence in order to get it's way. SEIU does... and for the record, I'm an involuntary SEIU member (see #4 in Eric's post above).

And zDawg is right. BIAW members voluntarily join. I was made an SEIU member against my will, and my position was unionized a couple of years after I was hired without me ever getting a chance to vote or have a say.

Posted by: Mike H on June 27, 2008 12:02 AM
6. The appearance of impropriety.

You've hit on something very troubling. While the Governor must collectively bargain with SEIU, the fact they are contributing over $500,000 to her re-election effort -- while engaged in negotiations for four different labor contracts -- certainly smells. At the very least it calls into question how much the Governor will truly negotiate on behalf of the best interests of the state as opposed to SEIU's best interests. Can't serve two masters, after all.

A private law firm would build a firewall to prevent any conflicts of interest. Has the Governor done so?

I'll also note that the law requires any agreement reached must be certified by the Governor's budget director as "financially feasible" for the state. I'm not sure any increase in compensation is financially feasible for the state, given the projected $2.5 billion deficit facing the next legislature, but I suspect somehow Gregoire's budget director will certify the SEIU contracts.

Posted by: Donovan on June 27, 2008 12:04 AM
7. #2: Get into the loop. Dino recently told the BIAW they would be heard but not receive any favors above anyone else. Don't you wish Gregoire had been that above-board when it came to dealing with her union and tribe special interests? Or is that okay with you that she's gone out of her way to do favors for all the liberal groups that gave to her campaign? Are you suggesting that you have a double standard?

Posted by: Michele on June 27, 2008 12:19 AM
8. "You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" is the way politics has been run this whole world over since the dawn of human civilization, and you right-wing retards are trying to act like this governor, in this state, invented it?

It's like Lieutenant Renaud in "Casablanca:" "I am shocked, SHOCKED, to find that policy decisions that benefit certain people result in those people supporting the elected officials who supported those policies."

THIS is what you're running a campaign on? Well, keep it up, I say. I'm loving it.

Posted by: ivan on June 27, 2008 06:07 AM
9. I wouldn't get too smug about the latest rash of headlines on money and the Governor.

It seems to me that the net result of all of this is to tag Dino Rossi as a guy who is in the bag of the BIAW, which has some pretty extremist positions on things and has already gone all gutter in this campaign - in repeat eyerolling radio ads that are obvious political spin at its worst.

Better to start with the idea that people are smarter than all of this.

All this stuff is a drag on both candidates, but it hurts Rossi more because it identifies him with politics as usual just as he's trying to define himself as a change agent.

The BIAW is not doing anybody any favors with its recent small time stunts.

Posted by: jan on June 27, 2008 06:25 AM
10. Yes, the nerve of Republicans to point fingers at the typical tit-for-tat exchanges that go on and have gone on forever in politics. As if they were immune to it and pure as Rush Limbaugh's 'wind-driven snow' - what a joke. Can we say BIG OIL, hope so cause we're sure feeling it. Republicans are no better or worse than all politicians and any attempt to portray a holier than thou attitude is transparent at best and in reality just outright hypocritical. If I were you I'd be thinking Blackwater/KBR/Halliburton/Cheney, and all the others who are benefitting from this scratch your back MO that you so decry.
What phonies!

Posted by: NativeSon on June 27, 2008 06:35 AM
11. Native Son @ 10:

The right-wing attack against Governor Gregoire is worse than hypocritical. It's an appeal to ignorance. It's telling the voters "You're so dumb you'll believe anything we tell you," even when it's manifest bovine excrement, and the voters know it.

It's a strategy designed to appeal to low-information voters, to "rile up the gomers." Well, here's a clue. We're not gomers, and we're not buying it anymore.

Posted by: ivan on June 27, 2008 07:36 AM
12. Notice how the Ronulans aren't posting as themselves anymore and all of a sudden, we have a new batch of exotic handles ranting and raving against 'good business' and 'good government' without announcing they are Ls?

I can understand ivan, but some of these other newcomers? They sound like our old friends, the Ronulans.

I'll go toe-to-toe discussing the good the BIAW has done for the State. It wasn't the Rs getting a backbone in the past, but it was the support of the independent businessman, it contractors and independent workers who forced some needed change and logic in the State legislature.

Evil? No, I don't think so, unless you are power mad and enjoy your monopoly in this State and don't want the applecart upset.

Posted by: swatter on June 27, 2008 07:46 AM
13. Interesting "an appeal to ignorance", so if I am in a union and I have a union lead negotiator working on my behalf and I find out that MY negotiator is taking money from management on the side, I as a union member should not be concerned? Talk about a hypocrite.

Posted by: Smokie on June 27, 2008 07:51 AM
14. Just an idea...probably too simplistic to ever be considered but what would happen to a national candidate who said,

"There is too much hidden money in politics! Only individual citizens can cast ballots, not PACs or Unions or lobbyists, so if I am elected, I will propose that only individuals can give any campaign contributions. There is no limit to the amount that any one person can give but it must be fully disclosed within 24 hours."

That way, it is very clear if someone is trying to "buy" a politician and no one can have their money taken from them involuntarily and given to a cause they don't support (i.e. many WEA members are actually conservative).

I'm not a big McCain fan but if he proposed something like this, I could consider him. And I think that any state or local candidate (Rossi) who got on board would benefit as well. Most people I know are disgusted by politics as usual and would welcome anyone who would actually work to restore some semblence of integrity....like I said, it's probably too simplistic and the power brokers would stop it in its tracks but I'd love to see the fireworks just for kicks!

Posted by: suzihomemaker on June 27, 2008 08:05 AM
15. Cause and effect is so obvious that no amount of obfuscation can hide the turnstile impact made popular during the Clinton administration. Acceptance of corrupt self-serving alliances by government officials for political advantage clearly demonstrates that segments of society choose to ignore morality in pursuit of power, regardless of the costs.

The recent Tribal gambling incidence is one such incident in a long string of incidences, over the decades, violating Executive power at public expense. Does anyone believe that the so call Tribal "contribution" was not a political payoff (bribe) resulting in huge benefits for the tribes at extraordinary public costs, one of which is lost tax revenues.

One may be sure that negotiations with SEUI will result in a similar fate.

Activities of both of these groups, SEUI and Tribal Gambling, are directly impacted by the State of Washington personally managed by the Governor. The same may not be said of the BIAW as the State (Governor) does not directly (personally) manage (negotiate) contractual relationships. To say it another way; unlike Gambling and Union Negotiation, there are no State monopolistic powers that directly control the activities of the BIAW members that the Governor directs or controls on a personal basis.

What is amazing to me is the willingness of Gregoire's supporters to defend her outrageous actions.

Posted by: Snuffy on June 27, 2008 09:31 AM
16.
I am eagerly awaiting the post that must be coming today on HA about the SEUI circumventing the intent of the campaign finance laws by running these ads through a front PAC. Surely those purists over there will blast the SEUI just as strongly as they did the BIAW for doing the exact same thing. It is about the finance laws, right? It isn't about the content of the ads or the positions of the backers, is it?

Posted by: Waiting for HA on June 27, 2008 10:18 AM
17. All government and educational employees unions have a direct, adversarial relationship contract relationship with every branch of state and local government. Their role is to extract the maximum amount possible from government employers for their members, including pay, vacations, pensions, health care, employment tenure, and restrictive work rules.

All forms of support from unions for political candidates are a direct quid pro pro for access, influence, and favorable treatment. These unions own,or at least rent, most politicians who accept their support. There is nothing more corrupt than this relationship. Hypocritically, politicians who are on the union dole deny that unions are even a special interest. SEIU, WEA and their affiliates are among the worst offenders.

The political playing field can be leveled only by eliminating all forms of legal constraints on financial and in-kind support for political candidates. This must be coupled with specific, enforceable requirements, subject to severe penalties for violations, that require every person or entity, who makes in-kind or monetary support must fully disclose the actual amount or value of all support, and the identities of everyone that directly or indirectly is involved in each contribution.

Full disclosure is the only constitutional means of letting voters know who is financing candidates for office and/or their political parties. Disclosure by parties is essential because they mask support of candidates with partisan issues advertising and hyping.

All limitations on any form of campaign financing unlawfully constrain free speech and are easily politicized. Let the voters decide which supporters are worthy or suspect with full knowledge of who are involved.

Posted by: Paddy on June 27, 2008 03:06 PM
18. I too once was a forced SEIU member. Long enough to recognize the organization as one of nasty-minded thugs with a real hatred of indivdual rights and the free-market economy. Violence and lies are all we can expect.

Posted by: JB on June 30, 2008 02:30 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?