June 16, 2008
Who is Fred Walser?

Fred Walser is a Democrat running for Washington State Senate in the 39th District. In a single week, he filed for office and pled guilty to providing false information in an investigation of a subordinate, which brings with it a fine of $20K and 240 hours of community service.

A new web site from the 39th District GOP, called Who is Fred Walser?, aims to inform voters about not only the many troubling circumstances surrounding this particular crime, but also about his record in other controversies, and to hold him accountable on other issues.

For now, enjoy a couple of videos about Walser's "Best Week Ever," then head on over to the new site to find out more about Fred Walser.

Cross-posted on <pudge/*>.

Posted by pudge at June 16, 2008 11:14 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Pudge -- the words to your song are technically incorrect. Fred Walser didn't file at the auditor, and couldn't have. The 39th LD has two precincts in King County (Skykomish and Stevens Pass), so he had to file with the Secretary of State and could not have filed with the county auditor. Only LD's entirely within one county can file with the local auditor. All LD's can file with the SOS, and multi-county LD's can only file with the SOS.

But all in all, a pretty good song.

Somehow I suspect that the 39th LD will be placed a good bit lower on the Democratic priority list. But even if Walser hadn't screwed up in a totally major way, Republicans are rather strong in the 39th LD and Val Stevens is extremely effective as a legislator and as a candidate.

I would think that the sentence -- 30 days of jail (converted to 240 hours of community service) and $20,000 fine pretty much speaks for itself. Too bad, since a "clean" Walser could have at least made the race interesting and at least slightly competitive.

With any luck, the Republicans will go overboard beating a dead horse (Walser) and focus less energy on other seats :)

Posted by: Richard Pope on June 17, 2008 01:22 AM
2. Richard Pope: and chances are, Fred wouldn't have done it himself, either. It's not important.

For many people his plea and sentence would be enough, but he has tried to spin it, in his words, as a "clerical error." The web site shows that there is far more to it than that, and all of it makes him look deceitful and conniving. At best. And we're not going to give him an inch on it.

Democrats ARE making runs for seats in the 39th, and people like Walser think, hey, "it's a Dem year, I bet I could win just on name recognition and party affiliation alone, since there's not much media covering the 39th to highlight my flaws." And our message in the 39th is clear: think on.

Posted by: pudge on June 17, 2008 07:43 AM
3. Pope is right that Walser is and was DOA months ago. So, why are they (the Rs) spending any energy on this race, or is this the best it gets?

Posted by: swatter on June 17, 2008 08:52 AM
4. swatter:

Who is "they"? The "they" is "pudge, chair of the 39th LD GOP in Snohomish County." My job is to help win the 39th LD for Republicans. What SHOULD I spend my time on? Would you have me not do my job ... ? :-)

This isn't the only race we'll be focusing on, but Walser did just plead guilty less than two weeks ago, so it's the hot topic, and Walser and his supporters have been trying to convince the public this was merely a clerical error. We won't let them spread even more false information, not without the facts in their face.

Posted by: pudge on June 17, 2008 09:12 AM
5. With a "dead horse" opponent or not, Val Stevens is worth defending from any spill over of a "dem year" in the other races. She has remained true to her principles and has served her constituents well. Other Republican candidtes would do well to follow her example.

Posted by: Michelle on June 17, 2008 12:38 PM
6. Absolutely Michelle!

Although honestly, thanks to equal parts Gregoire and Rossi, I think there may be more anti-Dem spillover than the other way around in this state. It's hard to judge at this point how the presidential race will impact us, but I suspect that despite you disliking McCain, that he will be good for other GOP candidates in general, in WA.

The most important thing to me is not just making sure Walser can't get away with fooling anyone, but that we send the message that we won't let others do it, either, not in the 39th, and soon not in the 10th, not in the 44th ... one district, once race, at a time.

Posted by: pudge on June 17, 2008 12:42 PM
7. I think the R party is due for an Extreme Makeover if a staunch conservative like Stevens is not same in a Republican District. If you are worried about "spillover" in her race, the Rs have serious issues.

Posted by: swatter on June 17, 2008 01:46 PM
8. swatter: were you around in 2006? 2004?

We had more Republican districts back then.

If we don't have Republicans who are going to make damned sure they hold the few districts we've got, then we will lose what little we have.

Posted by: pudge on June 17, 2008 01:51 PM
9. I think the bigger picture comes into play here as well.

The Democrats in Washington State thrive in an culture of corruption. From Tami Green to Geoff Simpson to Chris Hurst and now to Fred Walser? I could list even more.

When the GOP has "issues" with their candidates or electeds they clean them out. The Democrats go ahead and file them to run for office anyway.

And what is going on with the lack of accountability for Democrat donors and the labor councils? One week after Simpson was arrested for DV (following several years of restraining orders and nasty, nasty domestic problems that were well-known) the state labor council endorsed him...without either waiting to see what the truth was or even interviewing his opponent.

The labor council has endorsed Fred Walser.

Several other notables in Snohomish County have endorsed Walser, including Sheriff John Lovick, Councilman Dave Somers, the local teachers' unions, Crystal Hill the Mayor of Gold Bar (I'm disappointed in you, Crystal!), Don Gough, the Mayor of Lynnwood, and even Senators Hobbs and McAuliffe.

The fact is it's not just the Democratic party itself who don't take ethics seriously, it's the grassroots of their party as well.

The donors, big labor bosses and elected officials in the Democratic Party support convicts like Walser because they don't see a violation of the public trust as an important issue come election day.

If the voters keep agreeing with them, then maybe they are right.

Posted by: Chad Minnick on June 17, 2008 03:35 PM
10. No, I was cloned and they just woke me up last year. What did I miss in '04 and '06? I don't have those memories.

I think your time may have been better spent to get Jack Turk, a good guy and a smart guy, to run for a legislative office before going after executive?

Posted by: swatter on June 17, 2008 03:51 PM
11. swatter, obviously, I know you were around then. But I think you are letting your frustrations with the state of the party get the better of you: no district is ever "safe." The districts that think they are safe are the first ones to go.

As to Jack, while I do care about the other LDs, I don't spend much time working on them. He's in the 44th, and I know Mike Hope is the best candidate to face Liz Loomis there, but I don't know what Jack's prospects would be against Dunshee. I wouldn't guess very good, at least not until Mike can get in there (which I believe he will do).

And Chad, of course, makes a great point too: not without some valid reasons, the GOP has come to be seen as the party of corruption, but we know the Dems at least as bad overall, but in WA, they are much worse, and we need to be making that point, and Walser is as good a place to start as any. This is an indictment of the Democrats almost as much as it is of Walser.

There's really no downside to this. It's not like I am spending thousands of dollars and months of my time. It was a week or so of research and writing at nights, and $10 for a domain name, and in return we get a fairly comprehensive place for people to get the facts.

Posted by: pudge on June 17, 2008 04:22 PM
12. I think it's great. Keep up the good work pudge!

Posted by: Jenna on June 17, 2008 04:32 PM
13. Whoa, haven't heard anything on how Mike Hope is going after the disgraced former mayor of Snohomish (disgraced as in losing election).

Posted by: swatter on June 18, 2008 07:44 AM
14. Yeah, Liz was appointed to Lovick's seat when he became sheriff, and Mike's running against her.

Posted by: pudge on June 18, 2008 08:35 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?