June 16, 2008
Bottled Water Ban

Last week the King County Council voted to ban the purchase of water sold in personal plastic containers. The bottled water ban only applies to the county government's purchase of bottled water.

After billions of dollars have been spent on efforts to educate Americans about the benefits of recycling over the past two decades, and despite the fact that plastic water bottles are recyclable, it is good that council leaders are big enough to admit that county employees are simply unable to grasp the complexities involved in disposing their empty plastic containers in appropriately marked recycling bins.

Recycling: It's just too damn hard to do.

Here at Sound Politics we applaud the forward thinking leadership displayed by the County Council. Like its partner in the Axis of Evil, plastic grocery bags, bottled water is a threat to America that is greater than Islamic fundamentalism, greater than nuclear weapons proliferation and almost as great as Swedish pop bands.

We urge Democrats across the state to make banning bottled water a central part of their election campaigns.

With the ban on plastic water bottles, however, new and innovative ways must be discovered to slake the thirst of county employees whose throats are parched. With the dangers of fluoridated water known for decades the simple recourse of using tap water is not a viable option either.

A "Moon Shot" program is needed to combine the talent and ideas of today's brightest thinkers to create a new personal water delivery device to insure pure distilled water is available so Americans can replenish their precious, bodily fluids.

A compilation of some potential solutions to the plastic bottled water crisis are listed below...

Glass Bottles
Pro: During a scrape they can be used as an effective weapon in a pinch. The thought of an enraged Dow Constantine waving the jagged end of a broken bottled at opponents during a heated debate over another of his half-baked, feel-good environmentalist schemes would make watching County Council meetings worthwhile.
Con: Silicon-based products will soon be found to be a major contributing factor to Global Warming and Climate Change. Once the United States exhausts its finite silicate reserves the country will be forced to import foreign sand from the Middle East.

Native water-bearers
Pro: Known as bhistis during the Raj in India these low-caste denizens of the baggage train carried water for British troops and doubled as litter bearers during battles. They were memorialized by Rudyard Kipling's poem "Gunga Din".
Con: Use might inspire a surge in popularity for classic literature or British Empire films.

Water fountains
Pro: Infrastructure is already in place in most public buildings.
Con: Due to the lax WASL standards in this state signs with detailed operational instructions, warning labels and safety goggles must be posted near every fountain to prevent people from spraying themselves in the eye. The signs must be printed in at least twelve different languages including Tagalog, Basque and Sumerian cuneiform

Stillsuits
Pro: The apparatus is a product of Washington state native Frank Herbert and his vivid imagination. They play a prominent role in his book Dune. According to planetologist Liet-Kynes the stillsuit is...

"a high-efficiency filter and heat-exchange system. The skin-contact layer's porous. Perspiration passes through it, having cooled the body ... near-normal evaporation process. The next two layers . . . include heat exchange filaments and salt precipitators. Salt's reclaimed. Motions of the body, especially breathing and some osmotic action provide the pumping force. Reclaimed water circulates to catchpockets from which you draw it through this tube in the clip at your neck... Urine and feces are processed in the thigh pads. In the open desert, you wear this filter across your face, this tube in the nostrils with these plugs to ensure a tight fit. Breathe in through the mouth filter, out through the nose tube. With a Fremen suit in good working order, you won't lose more than a thimbleful of moisture a day..."

Their form-fitting design also looks mighty sharp.
Con: Councilmember Dunn is the only person in King County who knows how to properly wear the stillsuit Fremen-style, which is curious because "Reagan Dunn" also happens to be a killing word...


Canteens
Pro: The standard water storage tool used by American pioneers in the Old West.
Con: In the movies they are usually shot out of the hero's hands by the villain (who later on is unable to hit said hero at all during the final shootout) or while crossing a desert the canteen is inevitably cast away dramatically once empty. In Nam you have to drink the contents of the entire canteen or else Charlie will hear you coming due to the water sloshing inside.

Garden Hose
Pro: When you were a kid, running around the yard all day, playing in the hot sun nothing tasted better than cool water cascading out of a $5.99 hose bought from Chubby and Tubby.
Con: None known to date.

Wine skins
Pro: Mankind's earliest device to store liquids. Often made from stitched pieces of animal skin or animal gut, these water-tight bladders are simple and ergonomic.
Con: Kind of gross and smacks too much of a prop from a bad Hemingway novel.

Oxidative phosphorylation
Pro: Allows mammals to obtain enough moisture to live just from the food they eat.
Con: Despite millions of dollars in state funding by Gov. Gregoire on biotech companies the technology still does not exist to splice kangaroo rat kidney genes into those of humans.

Aluminum cans
Pro: Made from a recyclable resource produced locally in Eastern Washington.
Con: Just aren't as cool since bottling companies went away from pull-tabs.

Extra: The bottled water backlash is really precious considering it was health conscious environmentalist-types that moved here who are the ones responsible for the bottled water craze in the first place. After all, one most look the outdoors part when you strap on Made-in-China REI gear, hop in your Eddie Bauer Ford Explorer and drive to Paradise on Mount Rainier once every two years.

Nor is it the first, and certainly not the last, of environmentalist fads that have come and gone.

In the 1970s and 1980s plastic shopping bags were the environmentally correct solution to paper grocery bags, whose iniquitous use necessitated the genocide of innocent trees.

In the 1980s and 1990s safety groups, allied with "consumer watchdogs" in the media demanded the use of fire retardants in every household item from beds, clothes to drapes. Today the same PBDEs which were clamored for a decade ago - to save the children - are now a pollutant.

Today the backlash is just beginning against bio-fuels and toxic batteries supposed environmentally friendly hybrid cars.

It will only be a matter of time before organic foods are discovered to be harmful to the environment due to the agricultural technique's lower crop yields per acre and its reliance on natural fertilizers which produce more greenhouse gases.

Posted by DonWard at June 16, 2008 11:00 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Two plans come immediately to mind:
Plan 1: Stay out of Seattle.
Plan 2: Switch to beer (97% water anyway).
Recommendation: Implement Plans 1 and 2 immediately.

Posted by: Diogenes on June 16, 2008 11:42 AM
2. Don,

Thanks for the fun read. Stillsuits = funny.

"Tell me of your county council Mua'Dib"

Cheers,

Alex

Posted by: Alex Hays on June 16, 2008 11:48 AM
3. Yet another reason in a very long list, that we the long-suffering citizens east of the Cascade Crest would dearly love to be able to file for political divorce; and escape the ever-grasping clutches of terminally far-left ''Greater Seattle''.

Posted by: Methow Ken on June 16, 2008 12:10 PM
4. RE; #3 "testify brother, testify" Other than ceceding to Idaho from Hyak east. The prudent thing to do would be for Seattle to be it's own county. Just like SFO and LAX. Keep all your Marxist in one area.

Posted by: E. WA is Watching on June 16, 2008 01:15 PM
5. When I was a kid, drinking from the hose was an acceptable alternative to letting our moms catch us in the house and inflicting chores on us--AND it tasted great!

When I was raising kids, we were bombarded with public service messages about how poisonous hose chemicals were to our kids and pets. Parental duty then revolved around removing those death traps from our kids reach, lest they ingest hose toxins.

Our kids all drank from the hose anyway, and to date have suffered no brain damage from anything other than public schools and public service messages.

Posted by: Lisa on June 16, 2008 01:27 PM
6. All joking aside, I think it is a good thing that the county has ceased purchasing water in plastic bottles at taxpayer expense. When I worked in government, we had these things called "cups" that we filled at "sinks" when we wanted to drink water. I am sure someone has some old engineering diagrams laying around and can figure out how to do it again.

Frivolous idiocy is one thing when it's private money going to it (if people want to waste their own money that is fine with me), but quite another when it's our tax dollars.

Posted by: jvon on June 16, 2008 01:29 PM
7. Lisa@5,

I did the same thing as a kid too and I'd still be drinking from the water hose today if it didn't have a label with "Product of China".

Posted by: Smoley on June 16, 2008 02:00 PM
8. CO2 is banned. Water is banned. How long before the Left bans Oxygen?

Posted by: Jeff B. on June 16, 2008 02:30 PM
9. Actually, having worked with microbiologists I don't go for the bottled water unless other options are limited. If the greenie weenies applied the same hysterics to the little critters in bottled water as they do to pesticide "residue", they would all shrivel up and blow away from dehydration. Not that such an event would be a bad thing...

Posted by: Burdabee on June 16, 2008 03:41 PM
10. Alex,

Your reply had me rolling and it is definately Sound Politics "No-Prize" material.

Posted by: Don Ward on June 16, 2008 03:54 PM
11. shhhhh, don't tell them that we have oodles of plastic water bottles from costco sitting in our garage awaiting use at the kids' next sports activity or dance class....

Posted by: Michele on June 16, 2008 04:15 PM
12.
You Fools!

King County knows what's best for you. No, not some "distilled" or "purified" water -- but water recycled from your toilet bowl by the Brightwater plant!


Posted by: John Bailo on June 16, 2008 06:08 PM
13. Drink Pure McCain Cola...

www.campaigncola.com

Posted by: Jones Cola is good! on June 16, 2008 06:15 PM
14. ok--fine--banned...they make such a nice "poosh" when hit with a high velocity round...

Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on June 16, 2008 06:22 PM
15. Let them eat plastic.

Posted by: Walters on June 16, 2008 06:23 PM
16. Camels--everyone knows they carry extra water in their stomachs. I'm sure a few well-funded government studies can overcome the minor logistical difficulties involved.

Perhaps King County can hire an outside consultant to solve the crisis. Xi of The Gods Must Be Crazy fame comes to mind. His tribe had a flair for extracting water droplets from assorted desert plants. Xi would probably recommend glass bottles, because they are nigh indestructible ("reusable") and have many uses besides merely serving as a receptacle for liquids. They can double as a utensil with which to pound roots into mush, an instrument with which to make music, or a weapon with which to bop a coworker over the head.

Posted by: Tim B. on June 16, 2008 07:50 PM
17. I have bad news about the Garden Hose.

While I was still working as a low level peon for the council I was sent to take notes at a meeting of the Water/Sewer 10 year planning panel of some sort.

At the meeting there was a discussion about Brightwater, part of which was a discussion about the recycling of waste water as a means of water conservation.

During which it was suggested that non potable water could be used to water lawns as a water saving measure- this seemed to be going over well with all the members of the committee- so of course I had to raise my hand and point out that I drank from the hose as small boy, and that I suspected children still did. In fact I pointed out that I still did occasionally while doing yard work, and that many adults probably drink from the hose as well.

I heard one lady on the panel whisper to her neighbor: "Drinking from a hose? Who would do that?" She then went on to address me saying that she found it hard to believe that a mother would let her children drink from the hose. I responded that my mother definitely agreed with her, but that that had never stopped I or my siblings from drinking from the hose.

At this point the one sensible person on the panel (from the utilities) pulled back and said that this was premature anyways because there was currently no way to separate potable from non-potable water inside individual houses, and that the big water saving would come from using non-potable water in large sprinkler systems- for example on golf courses.

Then the environmentalist panel members went off on the suggestion that non-potable water should be used for flushing the toilet.

I again raised my hand and pointed out that this would again require separating potable from non-potable water inside of individual homes, which sounded kind of expensive to me, and that I doubted homeowners would go for it. The environmentalist tried to argue that the water saving would make up the cost to the homeowner, but I overrode him and pointed out the other problem with the idea was that in an emergency the water tank for the toilet is one of the sources of potable water if utilities are disrupted, (by an earthquake for example).

Again a women panel member said horrified: "Who would ever drink from the toilet!" I wanted to say that it beats dying of thirst, but instead just pointed out that King County's own pamphlets on how to deal with an emergency listed the Toilet Tank as a source of potable water.

I then added that considering the number of dogs who drink from the toilet, using non-potable water there might well result in a rash of sick dogs and irate pet owners.

At this point the pragmatic fellow from the utilities had his hand stuffed in his mouth to stop himself from laughing, while the environmentalists on the panel were glaring at me like I was a demon sent to torment them.

The begin asking who I was, and why I was there. At which point I did my "I'm just a humble intern here to take notes" routine. (My superior was there and seemed to have trouble deciding whether to kill me for offending the powerful interests or praise me for making such a good impression on the citizens who were there). Anyways, long story short the panel huffed a bit about how it was too early for these questions and how we needed to keep an open mind in these "early planning stages".

I quieted down after that, although not much of what came out after that was so full of obvious problems. Afterwards though a few of the citizens (mainly there to complain about water bill problems) came up and thanked me for saying something and adding some common sense to the mix- as it was apparent that most of the panel members were not familiar with normal suburban life. This seemed to assuage my superior as the citizens seemed might thankful that their council member was sending a smart staffer to keep an eye on "those government fellows".

The nice man from the utilities stopped by to thank me for my comments but to also let me know not to worry to much because this was just a dog and pony show anyways, that reality would be imposed once it got to the utilities to implement- although I got the impression he didn't mind some common sense being interjected (kind of like a stick in the spokes of a bicycle).

On a less happy note, one of the environmentalist representatives took me aside to say that while individual homes were not going to be targeted right away, eventually they would have to "adjust" to the water conservation needs so that we could keep the clean pure water for the salmon.

So while the garden hose is still safe for now, it might be sacrificed soon for the greater good of the salmon.

Posted by: Cicero on June 16, 2008 09:28 PM
18. When I see salmon disappear from restaurant menus, I might start taking this talk of needing to protect the salmon seriously.

Excellent story, by the way.

Posted by: jvon on June 16, 2008 11:50 PM
19. Well why wouldn't the council decide this? After all they decided the same thing at the Democratic Convention in Denver this year:

"avoiding use of individual water bottles in favor of pitchers or other such dispensers"

http://www.denver.org/metro/dnc/news-detail?bid=6

Posted by: TrueSoldier on June 16, 2008 11:59 PM
20. But, but, but. what about the plastic bottles of beer at the sports games?

LOL, oops they forgot that one!

Posted by: Army Medic/Vet on June 17, 2008 06:36 AM
21. ...as I recall, Kool Aid was once mixed in pitchers...any relevance?!

Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on June 18, 2008 01:09 AM
22. The bottled water companies should sue. It is blatant discrimination.

Posted by: informed voter on June 18, 2008 04:26 PM
23. Do you think your moron officials will stop with plastic water bottles? Naw! Petroleum products: Most cars are plastic. Your computer is cased in plastic. Your potato peeler has plastic in it. If you can't have bonfires on the beaches, you certainly won't be able to have picnics because you may use plastic utinsels or plates. How about your medicine bottles? Naw. Plastic. The seats in your sports stadiums? They have to go because they are PLASTIC. A petroleum product. Nitwits. Don't you get a little tired of the elites telling you how to live and with such stupid, vapid reasons? Get up on your hind legs and tell them to go to hell!

Posted by: clusiana on June 20, 2008 07:30 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?