June 03, 2008
Ride the Reform Wave

Jonathan Martin tells tale of McCain camp denizens pointing to Yuval Levin's Weekly Standard piece encouraging McCain to run a conservative, reform-minded campaign. The tome was worth the read when it first came out and worth it even more so now.

The crux of Levin's point is that McCain needs to capitalize on his favorable reputation - with independents that is - and run an aggressive campaign with a heavy emphasis on reform. A) This is a logical and superior counter to Obama's opaque "change" message and B) it makes tremendous sense given where the country is at on key policy-related questions.

For many reasons that are understandably similar, that is exactly the plan Dino Rossi needs to follow. Mercifully, he began that process many moons ago, beginning to lay out serious, conservative-infused reforms to address the issues voters care about most. One can be sure there will be more of that in the coming months.

With the top of the national and state GOP tickets poised to run in such a manner, down-the-ballot Republicans would be wise to do likewise. It's the best hope for even the top tier candidates for Congress and the Legislature navigating this election season with an "R" next to their name come November.

And in Rossi's favor, he doesn't suffer the same oratory gap with his opponent that McCain suffers with his.

Posted by Eric Earling at June 03, 2008 10:12 PM | Email This
Comments
1. What other kind of campaign would McCain, Rossi, and other Republicans try to run? A liberal and status quo-minded campaign?

Posted by: Noble on June 3, 2008 10:18 PM
2. It certainly doesn't hurt that the netroots are divided, either.

Posted by: blogs4mccain on June 3, 2008 11:14 PM
3. I hate to point this out to you Eric, but McCain's latest email message is about....change. It appears he is doing exactly the opposite of what the article says he should do. So far all I have seen McCain do is pander to the pro-illegal immigration and the "green" crowd and has left us Conservatives in the wake.

Here is the first part of McCain's latest email message:

Each American faces a decision this election and the choice between my candidacy and Senator Obama's could not be more clear. This is a change election. But the choice is between the right change and the wrong change; between going forward and going backward.


Posted by: TrueSoldier on June 4, 2008 12:49 AM
4. Yes, soldier, McCain flubbed the opportunity and tried unsuccessfully to go after "Change". However, "Reform" is already in his repertoire and really the same thing.

Posted by: swatter on June 4, 2008 07:23 AM
5. I think McCain needs to keep it simple. Obama has managed to boil his entire campaign down to one word. We can debate all day about what he wants to "Change" and how it impacts individuals.

I think at the end of the day conservatives just want to be left alone. We don't want to eat a government approved breakfast (with the right amount of trans fats) after being taxed for taking the morning leak. Nor do we want to stand in line to ride the government approved bus which takes two hours for a one hour trip. We don't want the government sticking their hands in our pocket to pay for a hippie museum. We just want to be left alone.

When McCain starts to beat him on this "Change" and how that change will mean a strict regulation of individual lives, it sets up a startling contrast.


Posted by: Guinness02 on June 4, 2008 07:29 AM
6. I absolutely agree in the abstract: the Republican message should be "reform", not change. We need to bring back the Mugwumps.

However, I fear that Rossi is still between being a fully Conservative Reformist and being a Republican version of 'Chris' Gregoire. That policy has shown to lead to defeat (Mike McGavick tried it and lost by double digits).

There is a real opportunity for a firebrand Republican to run against the whole kit-and-caboodle of 50 years of Democrat corruption and featherbedding.

However, "Bellevue Style" Republicans with $30,000 plate dinners and their hands in each others pockets just won't sell. The public will see them as "pre-corrupted"...as in they would simply eat all the pork for themselves versus the Democrats who at least let a few table scraps fall on the populace.

Posted by: John Bailo on June 4, 2008 10:39 AM
7. Let's do ourselves a favor and focus on getting Rossi elected. Forget McCain!

McCain, as is his predecessor, is a socialist war-monger posing as a something or another, I know not what.

I believe that we Republicans can best get Rossi elected by distancing ourselves from the disgrace that our national party has become.

Posted by: Small Government Steve on June 4, 2008 10:46 AM
8. McCain may try to run a reform minded campaign - but he starts off with lobbyists in key positions throughout his campaign, an Arizona land deal he is involved with along with naother lobbyist, ahistory of being overly friendly with another female lobbyist and the Keating 5 background.

You can't be a henhouse reformer when you are raising the foxes.

Posted by: correctnotright on June 4, 2008 08:02 PM
9. Good point correctnotright, but to be honest I would rather see someone with ties to lobbyists (like pretty much every politician out there) as President rather than someone that continues to show lack of judgement in the company he keeps. Obama's ties to the weather underground, Islamic Radicals, and even his campaign staffs ties to Hamaas are a bit more disturbing to me than McCain's ties to lobbyists.

Posted by: TrueSoldier on June 4, 2008 09:03 PM
10. Reform is a good theme for McCain vs. change with Obama. We'll see if he decides to use it - he may be too much of a maverick or too stubborn. He also has to distance himself more from Bush if he hopes to win. I think that he also needs to have a different spin on the war that will resonate better with people - like we need to bring most of our troops home once we achieve winning results and could as soon as next year - that's the carrot. Winning is important, but the initial mission was very questionable and handled abysmally by the Pentagon in 2003-04 and many people are sick of it. We still need security in the Middle East so let's focus more on Afghanistan.

Of course, we will have bases established in Iraq, which Bush did. These things will be more brought to light if the Town Hall meetings between him and the Dali-Bama occur.

Posted by: KS on June 4, 2008 09:27 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?