So you want to get a community organized and outraged city officials? Try putting a homeless encampment in their neighborhood.
The residents of Seattle's "affluent Magnolia neighborhood" are experiencing the phenomenon first-hand. The City of Seattle and homeless advocates - a misleading term if there ever was one - have the bright idea for Fort Lawton in Discovery Park by transforming the century-old former Army base into homeless shelters and low-income housing.
For some reason Magnolia residents are less than thrilled at the prospect.
The Seattle Times had a front-page story about the issue in their Saturday edition.
Just a hunch but one can guess that most Sound Politics readers' first natural inclination at this point is probably to sympathize with the local homeowners.
Homeless encampments drive down property values. Period. It's a fact in the real estate industry. Then there's the issue of whether they bring about an increase crime. The ongoing debate around where to locate "Tent City", which has plopped itself down in several Eastside cities like a family's unwanted drunken uncle, has more than fleshed out the pros and cons of homeless encampments.
This post isn't really even about the efficacy of these camps although you can debate that issue if you must.
The most important factor in this particular debate is that of hypocrisy.
As coincidence would have it this writer happened to be in Magnolia on Saturday; enjoying the second most beautiful day of the year to date with a reporter buddy who had never visited the neighborhood before.
The homes are stunning. The views along Magnolia Boulevard are gorgeous. Discovery Park is a gem with its unique ecology and geological formations that have been left relatively undisturbed for decades.
Driving past well manicured lawns and homes overlooking Elliot Bay and the Olympics a striking observation was quickly made. Magnolia is filled chock-a-block with a bunch of rich, white liberals.
There were Barack Obama '08 bumper-stickers everywhere and yard signs in heavy numbers. In fact after driving almost sixty minutes in the neighborhood we couldn't find a single piece of campaign propaganda for either Hillary Clinton or John McCain - or Ron Paul for that matter...
Here's another observation. After spending almost the entire day in rich, white, exclusive Magnolia this writer didn't see a single black person. Hell, for that matter, we only saw three minorities in total.
As a native to the area this is no surprise. Seattle has been getting whiter and whiter because of the "white flight" phenomenon of liberals fleeing here from more racially diverse cities.
It just sticks in your craw to see so much support for America's first credible black presidential candidate from a neighborhood of people who have intentionally chosen to wall themselves behind luxury in order to live apart from any person who remotely has the same skin color as their presidential candidate of choice.
You just can't have too much sympathy for these effete snobs.
These are the people that vote for and donate money to the local crop of bright-boy politicians who think that allowing drug dealers and bums (let's not use the misleading term homeless) to run rampant all over the rest of Seattle and the Puget Sound region.
Having populations of indigent panhandlers, alkies and stumblebums sleeping in front of doorways in Pioneer Square, Capitol Hill or the U-District and camped out in grotty little neighborhoods like Bothell or Woodinville is perfectly peachy. Just so long as the consequences of Magnolia's electoral decisions never encroaches on their posh, secluded oasis.
Here's a better idea than the one currently being proposed by the City of Seattle and "homeless advocates".
Instead of providing housing for around 100 less fortunate souls, why not move all the homeless in Seattle (and the entire region) to Magnolia?
Discovery Park has a large enough footprint to create a Hooverville of epic proportions. There's plenty of open space, access to the beach to collect driftwood or clams, water and utilities. Since so many Magnolia residents are no doubt guilty over how rich and white they are, it would be a thrilling opportunity to promote social justice and racial equality by having a shantytown smack dab alongside their exclusive Ozzie and Harriet homes.
Now that's change you can believe in.
Posted by DonWard at April 28, 2008 03:12 PM | Email ThisI Like Discovery Park. I think it's one of the undiscovered jewels in the city.
On the other hand, Magnolia property values plummeting means that Queen Anne property values will rise. Hmmm.
And then there's the value of seeing so many latte-liberals hoist on their own petard.
Guess I'll have to mull this one over :)
Posted by: Steve in Queen Anne on April 28, 2008 03:55 PMThey'll build the shelter, and some folks will live there and turn out okay.
The unintended consequence (thanks to this city's refusal to enforce its own laws) will be a bunch of "squatters" moving in right next door in the woods. They'll have tents up quicker than you can say Jack Robinson. That's where the drugs and the crime will mainly come from.
I don't jog the greenbelts on either slope of QA at dusk or at night for precisely that reason - they're packed full of bums. That's what Magnolia has in store for itself.
Posted by: Steve in Queen Anne on April 28, 2008 04:09 PMPlus signs don't tell the true story. It's still a GOP stronghold in a sea of liberal flotsam and jetsam. Typical of us evil rednecks in Magnolia.
Anyone who thinks that Seattle and “the people” are meting out overdue punishment on Magnolia establishing a homeless base here is ignorant of the McKinney Act and should do their homework before they “report.”
Plenty of “black” people live in Magnolia. They just aren’t loitering on the streets.
“Rich, white, exclusive Magnolia.” Please don’t tell one of Seattle’s finest citizens and Magnolia resident Carver Gayton that.
It's not a bad neighborhood even though Larry Phillips and Bobbe Bridge live here.
Of course, not everyone will shape up, just like there's always "that house" in the neighborhood, but that's life. Someone's always on the way down.
The real valid concern here is that SPD is absurdly understaffed for a city Seattle's size and in any case appears to be uninterested in anything but homicide and "revenue enhancement" ticketing. There's no evidence they will take legitimate nuisance and property crimes seriously in the area around Fort Lawton when they don't take them seriously anywhere else. This bodes ill for any hope of maintaining the necessary social standards for mixed-income development to have its desired effect.
Posted by: bad idea on April 28, 2008 08:22 PMIn the early 1950s, after Korea, I watched military convoys of returning servicemen streaming along Government Way to Fort Lawton. Fort Lawton was an ARMY POST, not a Navy base. The Navy was at Pier 91 (one of my high school chums' father was the C.O. at Pier 91). The Coast Guard was down on the Lake Washington Ship Canal, a short distance east of the Ballard Locks.
Passion is wonderful, but a bad fact, even one as minor as confusing an Army post with a Navy base, can destroy passion's effect. If a fact as small as this can be wrong, what about the larger issues?
DW - Derp. Error corrected Bob. Dumb of me because, after all, they even had a POW camp at Lawton. Teaches me for watching that Eastwood movie about the Navy/Marines while posting...
Posted by: bob in bellevue on April 28, 2008 09:49 PMHaven't we been building prisons?
Or is it that Mayor Nickles is reluctant to prosecute anyone for "drug crimes" (except if they are walking down Othello at 2 in the morning).
Posted by: John Bailo on April 29, 2008 08:46 AMHave a look at this news story from earlier this year.
Were the admitted drug users cited for possession of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia? Nope, not in Mayor Nickels' town.
Posted by: Smoley on April 29, 2008 11:49 AMhttp://www.marijuanaconversation.org/
Posted by: NW Denizen on April 29, 2008 01:12 PM