Maybe editorial page editors Mark Trahant and James Vesely will consider running some of his cartoons. (In recent years, most Pulitzer prizes in journalism have been best viewed as reprimands, since they usually go to journalists who have done shoddy work, or worse. It is good to see this exception, to see a prize that goes to someone who has been doing good work.)
The Seattle PI and the Seattle Times both have competent editorial cartoonists. (Though Horsey is often misinformed, and Devericks is not as good as he was a few years ago.) Neither paper makes good choices when they run syndicated cartoons. Typically, their syndicated cartoons manage to be both boring and mildly annoying. (Those in the Seattle Times are more boring; those in the Seattle PI are more annoying.) Neither paper runs many funny syndicated political cartoons. In fact, when I went through an entire month's worth of cartoons at both newspapers, I found only one or two syndicated cartoons that were even mildly funny.
I am not sure how Trahant and Vesely choose their syndicated cartoons. But it is obvious that they need different procedures. Let me make a small suggestion. At least once a week, they should look through cartoons from Ramirez, and other cartoonists who do not follow their editorial lines, and run one of those cartoons.
Both Trahant and Vesely have people on their editorial boards who can help them choose good cartoons — though they will have to use those people in an unconventional way. For example, Trahant should pick out some cartoons and show them to — well, I think I won't name anyone here — and if that person says something nasty and coarse about a cartoon, then Trahant should run that cartoon. Similarly, Vesely should show his cartoon picks to — and again, I think I will skip the name(s) here — and if that person throws a hissy fit over a cartoon, Vesely should run that cartoon.
By adding some funny (and controversial) cartoons to their mix, the two newspapers might gain a little circulation, or, to be more practical, at least reduce their losses in circulation.
(You can see Ramirez's recent cartoons here. I am especially fond of his March 24th Obama cartoon, as I have said before.)
Posted by Jim Miller at April 08, 2008 09:19 AM | Email ThisRamirez is great, because he presents things in such a way that they cannot be denied. My favorite is the firefighters holding the social security net. The left like to pretend that we can continue to fund their massive Ponzi schemes, but reality says different.
Posted by: Jeff B. on April 8, 2008 11:31 AMHorsey had a similar cartoon to this one a co-worker of mine had pinned up that had Uncle Sam shooting oil into his veins back in 2000/01 sometime.
This one in 2008 looks very similar to this one by Horsey in 2006.
Yeah, sure Dick C shot up one very imporant paper. yet the S/C has been doing that for years, but getting back to Dick. If he and GW had really done that you dem's have said, then you guys would have impeached both of them, but guess what... NOTHING.
And why, YA got nothing!
Zip-zero-Nada!
Posted by: Army Medic/Vet on April 8, 2008 04:16 PMRamirez is pure genius, the best and brightest since MacNelly. No wonder the LA Times cut him loose. No wonder "news"papers are flatlining.
Posted by: 'Toon Swoon on April 8, 2008 05:00 PMwell, they can always hope for more US deaths, while they of course support the troops.
Posted by: sherlock on April 9, 2008 06:31 PM