![]() | I called Mayor Greg Nickels office yesterday to ask whether they wish to respond to my point that all these active government measures about "global warming" seem a little funny when Seattle is experiencing record low temperatures day after day. I was pleasantly surprised when Mayor Nickels himself called me back and granted me a substantive phone interview on his plans for fighting climate change. Excerpts: |
Nickels: First of all, Stefan, I want to thank you and your fellow writers at Sound Politics for your eagle eyes in the area of government accountability. Of course I hotly disagree with much of what you write. But we in government have so many more items on our agenda than is humanly possible to deal with at any point in time and we depend on watchdogs from across the political spectrum to remind us where we've let things fall through the cracks. Like when you busted my chops a couple of years ago on that gas guzzling city car. [link here -- Ed.] That was a welcome kick in the pants to my office to do the right thing that I had been intending to do for a while. So we now have a more fuel-efficient car and we've also slowed the rate of growth in miles driven. We're down from a projected 105 miles a day down to 102 miles a day. So the City of Seattle is grateful to you for your commentary on that one issue.
And of course we have to focus on climate change even, some would say especially, when we have record low temperatures. As you know, I'm not a scientist. I dropped out of college to go into public service before I had the opportunity to take any science classes. I'm humble about my own limits in that regard. But we have a world class team of advising scientists from UW and elsewhere who consult with us constantly. And as they explain it, and this might sound counterintuitive to those of us who aren't educated in science, the predictive models for climate change have very wide confidence intervals. The average trend is moving warmer, but the models also predict that the climate might get colder or might get more or less warm or cold than it would otherwise, or it might even stay more or less the same. So we have to prepare for all of those contingencies. That's why we don't talk about "global warming" so much any more as we do about "climate change", because humankind is changing the climate, especially through carbon emissions, and we have to fight that change by lowering carbon emissions, even if we can't predict with pinpoint accuracy how the climate would be affected if we do nothing at all.
So our priority in the City of Seattle is to do whatever we can to lower our carbon footprint. We've started by reducing dependence on vehicles, especially on carbon-based fuel consumption. We encourage energy efficiency in the home -- better insulation, more energy efficient appliances and the like; More recycling. But that's just the first step. Long-term we have to think very hard about how to reduce our individual carbon footprints. Some of these will be small changes, others may require deeper lifestyle and cultural adjustments, but they're all essential to minimize our impacts on the environment.
Take,for example, carbonated beverages. Most people have no idea how many millions of kilotons of CO
And the CO
Finally, Seattle is going to make a big push on the Zero Waste initiative. You probably saw in the news today that the City Council is making it easier for citizens to recycle. [news link here -- Ed.]. Anything we can do to reduce waste is encouraged. And I do mean anything. Sheryl Crow got a lot of criticism for talking about using less toilet paper. Of course we're not going to legislate anything along those lines. But that's the type of innovative conservationist thinking I personally encourage. Use less toilet paper. And you don't necessarily have to flush every time you use the lavatory. And frankly, we should look to our diverse cultural heritage and learn from what some of the non-western cultures can teach us about conserving resources and minimizing waste. And I know some of these ideas might be difficult for most people from European backgrounds to swallow and I don't expect them to be widely adopted immediately. But here in Seattle, where we care deeply about the environment and where we are open to learning from other cultures, we can at least start the conversation.
Me: I'm not sure I follow what you're talking about.
Nickels: One of the men in 20th century world affairs that I admire the most is a Prime Minister of India from the 1970s named Morarji Desai. He lived to be 99 years old and he was a wonderful example of how to live a healthy and an environmentally responsible life. If you haven't heard about him, just look him up in google and I'll leave it at that. [link here -- Ed.]
Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at April 01, 2008 12:25 PM | Email ThisBut, truly, a good yarn.
Posted by: swatter on April 1, 2008 12:52 PMI asked him which of his three massive energy sucking homes he was calling from, his 10,000-square-foot, 20-room, eight-bathroom home in Nashville, or his 4,000-square-foot home in Arlington, Va, or his third home in Carthage, Tenn?
But he was high above them all in his private climate killing Jet.
It was nice however that he took the time out of his busy lifestyle to call.
Thanks Al! I'll be watching for you in the November race after your other two Rambos rip each other and the party up.
Posted by: GS on April 1, 2008 01:08 PMBravo, Stefan. Very good and clever.
Posted by: Michele on April 1, 2008 01:26 PMI think you missed one avenue ripe for a lampoon, however. My vague HS remembrance of chemistry includes the notion that our exhalations include CO2, so the expanding belt sizes of those mentioned are proof of their commitment to the environment by not exercising. Hmm...there's a joke somewhere in there about toxic emitions, but digress.
Posted by: scott158 on April 1, 2008 01:27 PMWho's up for it?
Posted by: Gary on April 1, 2008 02:59 PM"Massive Greenhouse Gas Emission Identified in Pacific Northwest"
You will all be sorry when the dream Gore-Nickels '08 turns into reality.
Posted by: storsie on April 2, 2008 08:30 AMSolar Cycle 24: Implications for the United States
"Mr. Gore, can we have our Nobel back, you ass?"
Posted by: Reality on April 2, 2008 04:01 PMNice link Reality. There are many more, there is forthcoming work by Watts and Copland that further implicates the Sun as the actual driver of Earth's temperature. Which anyone who's ever noted the difference between day and night could tell you. It's ridiculous to think that the Sun is not the majority driver of Earth's climate.
Interestingly, the Marxist nuts want to simultaneously overstate man's influence, and then kneecap him all the same.
Posted by: Jeff B. on April 2, 2008 04:44 PM