March 31, 2008
Not too Brightwater
The Seattle Times reports that King County officials are surprised by the ever escalating cost of Brightwater:
The Brightwater treatment plant is now expected to cost $1.8 billion -- roughly double what the Metropolitan King County Council was told when it first approved the project.

Officials don't know of a plant this size anywhere that has cost so much.

The soaring price of the most expensive public-works project in county history means higher sewer bills for everyone. Buyers of new single-family homes in most of King County and parts of Snohomish County are paying the most -- on average, more than $1,000 this year.
...
How did Brightwater get so pricey?

Don't King County officials read the Times editorial page? Brightwater isn't "pricey". It's an example of Ron Sims helping to create wealth more efficiently!

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at March 31, 2008 04:53 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Oh lets not even get started, when have they ever built anything on budget.

How about the 4.3 Million in art for a septic plant.

Now that really takes the cake for taxpayer waste, or waste water, whichever you choose.

Posted by: GS on March 31, 2008 05:41 PM
2. We'll make it all back in wedding rentals!

Let's not forget, in addition to sewage treatment, we'll be able to celebrate weddings on the artfully landscaped (if questionably fragrant) grounds of Brightwater:

Colonel and Mrs. Arthur Wienerbarger
invite you to celebrate
the marriage of their daughter

Patricia Hortense

to

Mr. William Stanley Poindexter

Four o'Clock in the afternoon
Saturday, the 25th of June, 2011

At the BRIGHTWATER SEWAGE TREATMENT CENTER...

Dinner reception to follow on-site (YUM!)

Posted by: Insider on March 31, 2008 06:37 PM
3. Get rid of the art part. That'll save some $$. And the rest, well that's just too bad for us, huh Sims? Btw, speaking of public works art, the concrete design on Redmond's new 520 flyover ramp is ugly. I want my money back.

Posted by: Marlo on March 31, 2008 06:50 PM
4. @1: Figures that all conservatives care about are superficial dollar figures, with no understanding of what's really going on.

Seriously, putting in money to beautify the site and placate the neighbors is worth far more than the number they quote. The delays from court actions by neighbors to prevent wastewater treatment plants from going online are a substantive problem. It's better to address their concerns rather than dealing with the nasty process of takings later on.

But let's drop a wastewater treatment plant in *your* neighborhood, and we'll see what you do!

And of course there are overruns. Construction activity is up, labor and materials are more expensive. If there hadn't been a building boom in the region, there wouldn't be the higher costs.

Posted by: cnb on March 31, 2008 06:51 PM
5. If we had just handed out the $4.3 million to owners of nearby property instead of spending it on art, people would have been fighting to have the plant in their neighborhood.

The art is virtually guaranteed to be bad, after all it is the King Cty. Exec. and Council who ultimately are selecting it.

Posted by: russell garrard on March 31, 2008 07:11 PM
6. Take a look you dumb liberals. Exhibit A of waste. This is why we don't want to ever give you a dime of our hard earned money. You piss it down the drain. This fine example of gov waste courtesy exclusively of Liberal Democrat Ron Simms.

Posted by: pbj on March 31, 2008 07:15 PM
7. Lie-ber-alls are so full of shit, I wouldn't be surprised if the plant ends up at four times the cost.

Posted by: pbj on March 31, 2008 07:17 PM
8. There are plants in the US of similar capacity and the same technology that were built for 1/3 of the cost of Brightwater. This is a prime example of a project that should have been a design/build/operate contract. That would have eliminated the cost overruns from change orders, whims of Sims and the Council, and other avoidable circumstances.

Worse, the overruns translate into significant increases in sewer bills for users in two counties. Significant means $1000 to $1500 per year.

It is long past the time to remove Sims and the Council from office. Sadly, the majority of voters are too stupid to realize they are being screwed, much less doin anything about it.

Posted by: Paddy on March 31, 2008 07:37 PM
9. Everyone has conveniently ignored that Brightwater was originally approved by a REPUBLICAN King County Council majority back in the late 1990's to 2001 time frame. There were some Democratic opponents, but the Republican steamrollered them and got the Brightwater site approved.

Posted by: Richard Pope on March 31, 2008 08:15 PM
10. Hey, how about the "pay for itself Iraq War". " a few billion, tops."

You suckers crack me up.

We spend an extra billion on very much needed infrastructure and you think the world in coming to an end.

We spend and extra 500 billion on a pointless war in Iraq and ....

Posted by: Unkl Witz on March 31, 2008 08:25 PM
11. Let's put Blackwater in charge.
Or maybe KBR.

That'll show everybody.

Posted by: Jim on March 31, 2008 08:29 PM
12. DOES this mean Sno Cty gets more money for "mitigation". My understanding is the total mitigation offered to Sno Cty was based on a percentage of the overall project cost. Did we settle too soon for allowing King County the luxury of dumping their shiat in our backyards?

MAKE THEM GIVE MORE SNOHOMISH COUNTY COUNCIL idiots! (emphasis added)

Posted by: Mike Jones on March 31, 2008 09:18 PM
13. Brightwater's peanuts compared to the Sound Transit massacree.

Up by 900K is Brightwater? The Sound Transit agency takes that much in in tax out of poor peoples' pockets in two years. For nothing.

You all are getting reamed. Brightwater is not in the same zipcode as the real "biggest public works project in King County" and the Seattle Times gets paid to not point that out.

Posted by: knockers on March 31, 2008 09:35 PM
14. Yeh and I now see today bigspender Gregoire signed a bill giving every poor student $47,000 plus book fees to go to college with, do the math on that boondoggle and get back to me will ya!

Liberal tax happy spend happy regulating happy idiots

Posted by: GS on March 31, 2008 09:41 PM
15. This is one part of the story. The issues are:

1. Oversight and accountability

2. Does this overrun have anything to do with the shortfall in the county budget and the investment pool investment in subprime mortgages with at least 83 mill in exposure?

So, when this is added to the county shortfall and the subprime mortgage mess is the county is really, really, really shaky financial condition?

Posted by: WVH on March 31, 2008 09:42 PM
16. Maybe they can give us our 4.3 million back and move their self flushing Outhouses out of Seattle and on to the lawns of the place!

Now there's some art that befits that place! And it's free!

Posted by: GS on March 31, 2008 09:49 PM
17. Seattle's Outhouses = Dressing rooms for the Bride and groom, with self cleaning and timed door opening capabilities.

Just don't get no better than that!

Posted by: gs on March 31, 2008 09:54 PM
18. I would love to see where the overruns are comming from. Look at the original budget and then look at the current spending.
My feeling is we have to look hard at how the money is being spent. What special interests are getting a cut of the money. My nose says follow the money trail. Maybe then we can sue to recover money if it is found to be double the market real cost. Also like to look at the workmanship. Is it up to standards or is it to Substandard workmanship. That will need more repairs in the near future to increase the cost even more.
Efficiency of Government to do the right thing does not exist in the current KC council or Ron Sims. Keeping costs down being a priority or is paying back supporters via juicy contracts.
I have to say Follow the money trail. See where it leads. Or will they call the budget and real expense a secret hiding behind lawyers.

Posted by: David Anfinrud on March 31, 2008 11:03 PM
19. David Anfinrud,

Robert Mak did a show a couple of months back on the investment pool which invested in subprime mortgages. Why? The county is running a deficit. Why? There was the recent story in either the Stranger or Weekly, I can't remember which, about taxi licenses that were supposed to go to campaign donors until the other cabbies made a stink, no pun intended. Then there was the post here recently about some land deal in south King County which was going through, but now not maybe.

Something in the county is fishy, no pun intended.
I think you are right, some one needs to follow the $$$$$$, I guess nowadays, it is better to follow the Euros.

Posted by: WVH on March 31, 2008 11:43 PM
20. These big public works projects, notably including rail transit, are largely designed to provide millions in kickbacks to the politicians. The voters approving many of them are morons, but the politicians make out like bandits. Of course the news media ain't never heard of a thieves kitchen.

Posted by: JB on April 1, 2008 12:48 AM
21. Didn't libs trick people into thinking it was good to vote for prof candidates...that is, vote for good government...not idealogues.

So we get a lifer politician like Ron Sims, who is incompetent. He buys train track to turn into trails, simultaneously pisses away billions on a redundant bus servce, now this....


kudos to mostly lefty Times for running the story

I didn't check; do they mention Sims is a Dem?

Posted by: righton on April 1, 2008 03:58 AM
22. If only there was a way to "treat" the solid waste sitting on the K.C. council that makes these ass-inine decisions with our tax money.

Posted by: Rick D. on April 1, 2008 06:18 AM
23. I heard Sims is advocating that King and Sno County require installation of pay toilets in all private residences by 2012 in order to recapture Brightwater cost overruns. He is quoted as saying, "Turd taxing is the wave of the future", and implied that those who pass gas will be next to feel the assessor's bite. "We're still working out the details on that, specifically how to attach the flatulent meters, composition of collected gasses, etc." Stay tuned for further developments on additional, and even more invasive, budget-balancing measures.

Posted by: Saltherring on April 1, 2008 07:12 AM
24. Richard Pope is once again making up facts not in evidence. If you go to King County Website Brightwater page they have a complete history of the project. I think you will find that the final decision on the location of the Brightwater facility was made on December 1, 2003 by Ron Sims. There were several siting options on the table prior to that, with extensive hearings, run by a Democratic controlled County Council (Since 2001). Now tell us again Richard, how the Republicans "steamrollered" the Democratic opposition when they were not in the majority and Ron Sims made the decision.

Posted by: Huh? on April 1, 2008 07:14 AM
25. #24 Huh.

And Pope is a lawyer right?

Gezzz

Posted by: Army Medic/Vet on April 1, 2008 07:45 AM
26. Isn't Pope in the Reagan Wing of the Democrat party?

I do think there needs to be a change of venue on the County Council and at the State level. The pendulum needs to swing back.

Unfortunately, when it does swing back there will be nothing except more of the same on the other side.

Come on, Medic, Saltherring and HUH, you need to run for office.

Posted by: swatter on April 1, 2008 08:00 AM
27. When we bought our home (outside the growth boundary), we checked with the local wastewater treatment utility to make sure there were no plans to convert us to King County sewage treatment. Fortunately, there weren't. I think we pay about $300 every two years to get our septic tank pumped. We also avoided the boondoggle Sound Transit MVET taxes by being outside that boundary as well.

Posted by: Palouse on April 1, 2008 08:16 AM
28. I have held elected office and volunteer positions in local government. How about you swatter?

Posted by: Huh? on April 1, 2008 08:20 AM
29. SWATTER

Come on, Medic, Saltherring and HUH, you need to run for office.


Geee, thanks buddy. I'm hoping to retire soon and you want to give me a job THAT will kill me. 0-:

Posted by: Army Medic/Vet on April 1, 2008 08:22 AM
30. The news article to which the author responds to when writing this blog answers most of your questions, but you seem unwilling to consider what it says.

The largest single cause of the increase is the 10 year delay in implementing the proposal because of NIMBY delays. Ten years of price increases in all aspects from materials to labor. Indeed, there are design changes that have added to the cost, too. But, had we started building Brightwater ten years ago, it would be done now and much closer to budget, though still over for sure.

Posted by: kmort on April 1, 2008 08:50 AM
31. The news article to which the author responds to when writing this blog answers most of your questions, but you seem unwilling to consider what it says.

The largest single cause of the increase is the 10 year delay in implementing the proposal because of NIMBY delays. Ten years of price increases in all aspects from materials to labor. Indeed, there are design changes that have added to the cost, too. But, had we started building Brightwater ten years ago, it would be done now and much closer to budget, though still over for sure.

Posted by: kmort on April 1, 2008 08:52 AM
32. Turd Tolling, I'll bet Gregoire's democrats are writing the bill right now.

If it passes we'll put a booth outside the King County chambers door, outside the legislature in Olympia, and as close to seattle as we can get before the stench overwhelms us.

There should be enough revenue to pay for another Britewater or two from all of that Turd Tolling.

Posted by: GS on April 1, 2008 09:37 AM
33. If you want to really get upset, watch the KC channel when they repeat the latest budget hearing on Brightwater. They are not quite sure yet but they estimate they could be another "45-200 MILLION DOLLARS" over Budget by project end, BUT they are just getting started on the 13 mile tunnel and "anything can happen."

Posted by: Huh? on April 1, 2008 09:46 AM
34. Wrong county, HUH. But, I did move out of the City so I wouldn't be tempted to run for city office.

I do do some committees and have been elected to associations. I got 'burned' out on night meetings in the late 80s and early 90s. I started going to them a few years ago again to see if I could stomach them. I fuond I am still burnt out. A few years at three or four per week wore me out. Sorry.

Medic has no excuse, though.

Someone does need to step up that has 'common sense', though. I sometimes think that once people get elected they lose all perspective- like Sound Transit and Brightwater.

Posted by: swatter on April 1, 2008 10:32 AM
35. Dollars value falls, gas prices rise, inflation occurs, project costs go up.

Simple economics at work...how typical of people on this board to blame the party rather than looking at the actual cause of the problem.

Posted by: Cato on April 1, 2008 10:38 AM
36. Richard Pope:

The project approval is the only first action. All that followed is the source of the damage to the public. The project's scope, design, contracting process and award, and contract administration is overseen by Sims and his minions. Moreover, it is debatable that there is any need for Brightwater.

Sims has to go. Voters wake up.

Posted by: Paddy on April 1, 2008 12:14 PM
37. @18
"I would love to see where the overruns are comming from. Look at the original budget and then look at the current spending."

Let me guess. King County planners cooked the books to hide the impacts to reach Sim's targeted budget. Under fire from Maggi Fimia and her alternative plan to save several hundred million dollars for the taxpayers, Sims probably just told his minions to build him a $1 billion cost and ignore anything that would push it higher. Then once Sims got his approvals based on their routine manipulation of studies, hired-gun experts, bogus forecasts, science and misuse of the law, he could start addressing the real impacts after it was too late to stop it.

And since this was a Master Builders backed idea to open up more development, developer-owned Republicans like Chris Vance were certainly on board to push it through the Council.

Oh, and once approved, a few extra bucks thrown here and there - to friends of Ron - would also certainly be career enhancing. Remember, Sims would be named the Master Builders 2005 Economic Development Champion for his Brightwater efforts. Everyone wins, except those of us paying the bills.

Posted by: MJC on April 1, 2008 02:30 PM
38. Oh, and I might add. If you're out east of Redmond up near Redmond Ridge and you see the For Sale signs for the new Redmond Ridge East development, remember that the King County Council approved that development just a couple years ago, despite it being proven that KCDOT cheated in their road analysis to help the project, and despite the fact that a King County Hearing examiner recommended denial of the project and the rescinding of its ill-gotten transportation concurrency certificate.

And if you happen to notice that area roads, especially during commute hours, have become increasingly congested over the last 15 years, and that not a single capacity-enhancing improvement whatsoever has been made since the original Redmond Ridge and Trilogy first entered public hearings, you should begin to understand how things are done in Ron Sims' King County. That $800 million cost overrun for the developers' new sewage plant would buy a lot of needed road capacity. And so would the wasted $600 million or so on Ron Sims' insistence on a new treatment plant over using available capacity elsewhere.

BTW- Has anyone considered the impacts on our already-overwhelmed road system when all that new housing is constructed that will be supported by Sims' and the Master Builders' Brightwater?

Posted by: MJC on April 1, 2008 04:29 PM
39. for the children...

hey--can we get the "community-payback" Tribes to build (ahem; "invest") in one or more of these?
they aren't exactly volunteering i noticed; how about all the xtra sewage from the new Tulalip Hotel? or is that a federal thing?

Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on April 2, 2008 09:45 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?