March 16, 2008
Daschle: Each State Should Have Equal Number of Delegates

In last week's Meet the Press, former Senator Tom Daschle said that each state's election is equivalent, from Rhode Island to California: "There's no question in my mind that the strongest candidate is the candidate who wins the most elections. Barack Obama has won 29 contests. Hillary Clinton has won 13 contests. That's the bottom line. There is no, no if, ands or buts about it."

If the number of contests won determines who is the strongest candidate, that means each contest is equal, which means each state should have the same number of delegates to national convention.

Of course, if each state should NOT have the same number of delegates, then the states' contests are not equal, which means that the number of states won is irrelevant.

The Democrats crack me up. Another example of stupidity from this week: Senator Schumer blaming President Bush because the Democrats have been successful at convincing people that Bush can't handle the economy. Seriously. He said one of the main problems of the eocnomy is that people don't believe Bush can handle it. It's the old "stop hitting yourself!" line.

I think George W. Bush will most be remembered for making people forget just how dysfunctional and silly the Democratic Party really is.

Also, I think I henceforth will call insipid lines from Democrats "Daschumers." Used in a sentence: "Wow, did you hear that Daschumer from Ron Sims, when he said that the error rate of King County Elections was something any bank would be envious of?"

Cross-posted on <pudge/*>.

Posted by pudge at March 16, 2008 10:48 AM | Email This
Comments
1. This will an interesting factoid to bring back to the D's attention should McCain win more states but lose an electoral college tally (or the pop vote).

I expect the D's to bring it up if the numbers point the other way, but this has not happened in many years.

I wonder, and you folks with more historical facts at your finger tips can help here, if Carter won more states than Ford.

Posted by: deadwood on March 16, 2008 11:00 AM
2. Carter won 23 states plus DC. Ford won 27 states.

However, I should point out he is only talking about who should win the nomination, not the general election. It is perfectly fine to say those two processes should be different.

Posted by: pudge on March 16, 2008 11:11 AM
3. Daschle is absolutely right. And in Washington's statewide elections, winning Lincoln County should count just as much as winning King County. Whoever wins the most counties should win the election.

deadwood: Ford won 27 states, Carter 23 (+ DC).

However, Carter won more counties.

Posted by: ScottM on March 16, 2008 11:12 AM
4. Thanks pudge and ScottM. Gotta love those Dems.

I think this is indicative of the influence of trial lawyers, whose lives are consumed by intricate parsing of every possible ounce of meaning in every little detail.

Posted by: deadwood on March 16, 2008 11:34 AM
5.
Well, the argument goes to the heart of Republicanism versus Democratism. If the "United States" is a collection of individual governmental entities, each with a separate ideology and rational for governing, who choose to collectively participate in a Federal government, then yes, the important thing is how many states are won.

Posted by: John Bailo on March 16, 2008 12:03 PM
6. The Democratic Party has no one to blame but itself for this mess. The way they handle primaries and caucuses is ridiculous. The Texas two-step was a farce. Obama wins Mississippi by close to 70 pct yet he gets only 2 more delegates than Clinton. Clinton wins Nevada and she gets one less delegate than Obama. Blows your mind.

The Republican party's way of winning delegates is effecient, fast and civil. The Democrats need to revamp their system because they are starting to look really incompetent.

Posted by: carol on March 16, 2008 12:27 PM
7. Yes, these democrats really are hard to take seriously. We will always remember the democrat-designed and approved butterfly ballots in Palm Beach County 2000. They personally approved them and then got all upset claiming that people got confused by them---as if it were someone else's doing. These people never seem to know how to recognize their own mistakes. It's always someone else's fault. People like that give away all their power to someone else constantly, in that way. No wonder they're always claiming victim status.

Posted by: Marlo on March 16, 2008 12:29 PM
8. carol, not for nothing, but the "Texas two-step" is basically the same process we have here for the GOP in Washington. So saying their system is a farce but the Republican system isn't ... well, ours must be just as much of a farce. :-)

Posted by: pudge on March 16, 2008 12:33 PM
9. Senator Tom Daschle has had a habit over the years for running off at the mouth! In this case he is joining the chorus of D's who are trying to turn the democratic (small d) process on its head! I believe that given our experience these last few years with Governor Gargoyle and comic legislators like "Fast" Hans Dunshee, we in Washington know a nut case when we see one! Daschle is one.

Posted by: Bob Clark on March 16, 2008 01:17 PM
10. OT:

Here you go people of Tacoma!

Posted by: dcat on March 16, 2008 01:47 PM
11. There's a reason it's FORMER "Senator Daschle."

Posted by: hinton on March 16, 2008 03:18 PM
12. The man who beat Daschle, John Thune, is a graduate of my alma mater, Biola University. I take a measure of pride in this.

Posted by: pudge on March 16, 2008 03:33 PM
13. Pudge,
Catching up on posts this weekend after a busy week. You are very much correct that Daschle made an idiotic statement. Good post.

TC

Posted by: tc on March 16, 2008 04:25 PM
14. weird thought - since California is going to split it's electoral votes using the popular vote of the country and the it's law makers are mostly democrats, doesn't it follow they should award it's delegates based on who gets the most popular votes in the primary.

Posted by: Ron K on March 16, 2008 05:16 PM
15. #8 - you missed the most obvious idea that could come from this statement - that the Washington State GOP is also a farce.

I'm not sure I could disagree.

Posted by: johnny on March 17, 2008 12:32 PM
16. johnny: thank you for your vapidity.

Posted by: pudge on March 17, 2008 01:09 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?