March 07, 2008
To Answer Knute Berger's Question

Yes, a Hillary Clinton nomination would help Dino Rossi. If for no other reason than Barack Obama's proven ability to bring newer and younger voters into the fold.

King County's high turnout of 83% in 2004 was challenging enough. A few more percentage points from college-aged voters and other disaffected liberals otherwise inclined to be flaky about their voting privileges isn't terribly high on the to-do list of the Rossi campaign.

Posted by Eric Earling at March 07, 2008 07:42 AM | Email This
Comments
1. Futile, unrealistic wishful thinking! :)

Posted by: Duffman on March 7, 2008 07:43 AM
2. Somehow, I'm betting Dino is going to have his hands full no matter who gets the nomination. With the economy going into the tank and the Iraq war dragging on, there will be a lot of disgruntled folks who ordinarily don't vote showing up to have their say. I seriously doubt these same folks are going to pull the lever for a smiley real-estate agent with no executive experience to be gov.

Posted by: Unkl Witz on March 7, 2008 08:06 AM
3. What can I say, young voters are extremely dumb. I don't buy this "if you don't have a heart when you're young" there's something wrong with you. That's just code for Marxism. There's nothing wrong with using your head from the earliest age.

Posted by: FreedomLover on March 7, 2008 08:10 AM
4. Unkl Putz:

Any evidence that economy is "tanking" other then reading your excrement for signs?

Posted by: FreedomLover on March 7, 2008 08:13 AM
5. Would those be the same folks who would blindly "pull the lever" for a smiley co-dependant enabler with no experience as an executive like Hillary. Or a smiley "Ginsu Knife for change" pitchman with no executive experience like Obama?

Posted by: Huh? on March 7, 2008 08:16 AM
6. I sense Queen Christine will be dethroned by the exulted Dino Rossi in 2008. That is, if this state wants to recover from 25 years of liberal ideas that have taken us into the crapper. The Queen will have her blind, loyal legions of the ignorant out en masse as well however, so it will be a close one........but, with any luck, the King County elections will not disenfranchise the "will of the people" this time like they did in 2004. Had they not interferred 4 years ago, we'd be on the road to recovery instead of the road to nowhere.

Posted by: Rick D. on March 7, 2008 08:24 AM
7. F-lover:

Sounds like you've been out of the country for a few months. The chairman of the Federal Reserve has been testifying before congress to this effect since Christmas and the Dow is off 2,000 points. Even George Bush has voiced concerns.

Feel free to ignore the evidence though if it doesn't fit your ideology.

Posted by: Unkl Witz on March 7, 2008 08:25 AM
8. Freedom, dolts like the troll posters will continue to talk down the economy with talks of taxes, carbon footprints, stopping oil independence and free health care and insurance.

It just has to tank. When the election is decided and it is an R, expect the stock market and economy to rebound.

Rossi will ride the Clinton coattails into the governor's mansion. The question I have is whether Rossi will bring the state to McCain.

Posted by: swatter on March 7, 2008 08:31 AM
9. The economy is slowing because of expectations of the Tax cuts not made permanent. INcrease costs to businesses with tax increases. Means they are expecting to foot a higher tax bill. So not as much hiring. Maybe layoffs. Because of the uncertainty of the situation.
The Banking issues were made by greedy people trying to get people to refinance their homes and increase their income. Eventually people looking at lowering thier monthly bills as Property tax bills started to increase. Or buying homes on expected income increases to cover the increase in INterest rates. And their incomes did not grow as fast as the interest payments grew due to getting a variable rate interest rate.
I never bought in on variable interest rates but too many people went in to get those deals or the interest only loans. What a disaster. People spent the savings instead of paying down principle. Credit Card debt has not dropped so those bills are eating up more money. You eventually do not have a lot of money left to grow the economy.
the best thing for our economy is to make tax cuts permanent and then we would have some stability added to the future. SInce Democrats want to only increase taxes and they run both the House and Senate. Their actions are to let the tax cuts expire and they do not have to vote for tax increases that they so desire. And hide their greed. The comment will be well they expired nothing I could do about it. Their inaction is actualy an action to increase the tax bills on us. Because anyone who got the tax cut was wealthy. They do not deserve any tax cuts. Just as the Alternative Minimium Tax is catching more and more people. So that everyone pays there share of the tax load.
The question is the definition of rich being anyone working? I see rich determined by lower and lower numbers. I make good money but do not have a lot of money to live on. ANd I live very modestly. We all have bills that we can not control. I am doing my best to get bill free. But it will be a few years to meet that goal. Longer if tax rates increase.

Posted by: David Anfinrud on March 7, 2008 08:48 AM
10.
If we really want to defang the triple headed Lib hydra (Sims-Gregoirius-Nickles) we also need to start getting some top notch Republican candidates for Mayor and King County.

It's time for a true Republican Reformation movement to sweep out the crooks from WA politics.

Posted by: John Bailo on March 7, 2008 08:53 AM
11. Any evidence that economy is "tanking" other then reading your excrement for signs?

Maybe you missed the facts that bank stocks are tanking due to a slew of bad loans. This has led to huge increases in foreclosures. The huge increase in foreclosures pretty much killed the housing boom. Now that the housing boom is over it's starting to affect other areas of the economy as spending slows. Meanwhile the dollar is at an all time low while oil prices are at all time highs. This effects gas prices which go up, causing prices to inflate, thereby causing people to cut spending. Lack of consumer spending leads to layoffs as companies try to remain profitable. meanwhile recession sits in and stagflation works it's magic.

Would those be clear enough signs for you?

Posted by: Cato on March 7, 2008 09:34 AM
12. David:

Right on the money. Democrats are 100% responsible if the economy tanks.

Posted by: FreedomLover on March 7, 2008 09:34 AM
13. Cato:

Still no evidence of a real recession. Certain sectors are tanking(loan industry, auto industry) but otherwise the $12 trillion economic juggernaut continues apace. Nothing can stop this machine.

Posted by: FreedomLover on March 7, 2008 09:41 AM
14. The economy is slowing because of expectations of the Tax cuts not made permanent. INcrease costs to businesses with tax increases. Means they are expecting to foot a higher tax bill.

The economy is slowing because we're engaged in a war in an oil rich region. This causes investors to worry about supply especially since demand has increased significantly since China and India have become world powers. This increased demand leads to higher prices as demand outstrips the supply. The US economy feels it as prices of gas (an oil byproduct) increases. As people pay more for gas, they pass the price increases onto consumers, causing prices to inflate.

It's simple Economics of Oil Dependency, it has very little to do with the perceived repealing of the Bush tax cuts.

You eventually do not have a lot of money left to grow the economy. The best thing for our economy is to make tax cuts permanent and then we would have some stability added to the future.

Oh yeah, cause decreasing our revenue while increasing out spending has worked so well these last seven years. How big is the deficit?

I think a more reasonable argument would be that 9/11 lowered interest rates to unreasonable levels, people took advantage of it to secure low rate loans to bring about economic gain. People expected the economy to keep growing at an uncharacteristically high level and were caught off guard when housing prices hit their peak.

I see rich determined by lower and lower numbers.

I see the dollar becoming worth less and less, maybe there is some sort of correlation here? Hmmm.

Posted by: Cato on March 7, 2008 09:52 AM
15. Still no evidence of a real recession.

What would you define as a REAL recession? According to Wikipedia a Recession is defined as "a decline in a country's gross domestic product (GDP), or negative real economic growth, for two or more successive quarters of a year."

It seems that many economists at many prominent firms are predicting the GDP to drop this quarter making it the second one in a row. Thereby meeting the definition of a recession.

Posted by: Cato on March 7, 2008 10:00 AM
16. Liberals can't have it both ways. Blame Bush if the economy is bad, but if it is good Gregoire gets credit.

Which is it liberals?

Posted by: pbj on March 7, 2008 10:38 AM
17. Cato:

The fourth quarter actually posted a 0.6% growth, so you're a big fat liar.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-economy-slows-06-growth/story.aspx?guid=%7B9C5A0518-549D-4A8D-8666-881C32657085%7D

Posted by: FreedomLover on March 7, 2008 10:50 AM
18. The 90 day land grab gone bad and $13+ Billion a month in Iraq hasn't helped the economy. If Juan McSame wants to bring a victory to Washington State for himself and Rossi he better learn some cutesy economic talking points. Looking under your bed for terrorists isn't going to carry the day come November.

Posted by: HappyHeathen on March 7, 2008 11:06 AM
19. Liberals can't have it both ways. Blame Bush if the economy is bad, but if it is good Gregoire gets credit.

Which is it liberals?
Posted by pbj at March 7, 2008 10:38 AM

Well Bush is President of the whole UNITED states (though sometimes it's hard to tell, I grant you) But Gregoire is only Governor of one state.

National Economy is in a downturn, local economy seems to be puttering along not great but better than most.

In previous elections I have voted for a lot of republicans including Carlson and Dino, but I won't be voting for any Republicans this year. Although George Bush is not running his unpopularity will sink all republican ships this year.

Posted by: ExPatBrit on March 7, 2008 11:09 AM
20. Blame Bush if the economy is bad, but if it is good Gregoire gets credit..

National economy is bad, local economy is good. Dem's hold majority's in both places. Dem's have held Governor and local legislature majority since god knows when.

Dem's in DC. have only had it two years and have yet to pass a full budget yet as the majority party, the budget President Bush proposed is the largest in American history (and so is the proposed deficit).

GOP has only themselves to blame.

The fourth quarter actually posted a 0.6% growth, so you're a big fat liar.

I stand corrected, but still I would argue the next two quarters will be negative especially considering the drop in corporate payrolls, oil prices riding, and late mortgage payments continuing to climb. It's going to get worse before it gets better.

Posted by: Catob on March 7, 2008 11:24 AM
21. SOMEbody 'finally' gets it!

Is it me or is he starting to look like Alfred E Neuman !!

BUSH: Party of two - your plane is ready. BUH-bye!

Posted by: Duffman on March 7, 2008 11:50 AM
22. Catob:

You're nothing but a liar and nothing you say is of any relevance to me.

Posted by: FreedomLover on March 7, 2008 11:51 AM
23. You're nothing but a liar and nothing you say is of any relevance to me.

You can plug your ears and stick your head in the sand all you want, thats fine with me. When reality comes calling I'll still be here.

Posted by: Cato on March 7, 2008 11:58 AM
24. I can speak from direct experience. Manufacturing in the Northwest is robust. Nobody is laying off, and many are hiring. My company will be moving out of Seattle in the near future, due to high rental rates (theirs would increase by 4X).No recession here! I see a Seattle populated by aging baby boomers in million-dollar condos, and not many others.

Posted by: Carol Kujawa on March 7, 2008 12:01 PM
25. If I'm to follow the above string, we're definately in a recession....errr, they're predicting a recession coming...err, ok, so it hasn't met the criteria of a "recession", but believe me when I tell you.......it's here.

I'm glad we've cleared up the confusion.

Posted by: Rick D. on March 7, 2008 12:04 PM
26. And there you have it. Carol says no recession here because everything is hunky dory where she lives and works. I sure that's because of George Bush's policies and not Christine Gregiore's.

And don't you worry your pretty little head about those liberally biased facts like the DJIA being down 2,000 points or recent job loss figures.

Posted by: Unkl Witz on March 7, 2008 12:38 PM
27. I agree Unkl, we should just ignore those falling Consumer Confidence numbers, they mean nothing.

Like Freedom Lover says, things in America are just doing peachy, only one or two sectors are bad, "nothing can stop this machine". Let's start blaming the MSM for trying to convince us the American economy is in such bad shape.

Posted by: Cato on March 7, 2008 01:31 PM
28. No doubt Lover-boy will be up for the Nobel prize in economics this year for his cogent analysis.

Posted by: Unkl Witz on March 7, 2008 02:18 PM
29. Get real. If there is one thing that can be manipulated for the short term it is the economy. Look at 2004. We get the Saudis to cut the oil prices/increase production. The real estate industry pumps up the numbers (they can be adjusted downward in Dec.), Wall St. pours billions into the market and behold - the great economic miracle occurs in October!!!! Don't worry - the economy will be roaring come election time. Republicans will sweep into office on the good economic news. I'm sure we can do this, but the problem is cleaning up the long term mess. I'm beginning to wonder if it might be better for the D's to win it all in Nov. and then dump all the blame on them for the bad state of affairs.

Posted by: Rocketdog on March 7, 2008 03:41 PM
30. Wall Street is terrified of the damage dimwitted dems can and DO to the economy... the infighting, the refusal to renew the tax cuts, the possiblility that marxism will move into the executive branch.
It's amazing how the dimwitted cause the problems then whine because of the problems.

I however have to agree with Carol... business is booming and profits are up...
even after the dimwitted dem tax punishment.

And regarding the mortgage crisis... please don't forget who caused it: the whiny dems in congress boohooing about the fact so many couldn't qualify and then forced the industry to relax standards. If you are a moron, you actually think the mortgage companies willingly cursed themselves with deadbeats ans defaults.

Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold on March 7, 2008 03:45 PM
31. the possibility that marxism will move into the executive branch.

Gotts hear how you defend this one. Next thing you'll be telling me the Homosexuals are a greater threat to the nation than Muslims.

I however have to agree with Carol... business is booming and profits are up...

Which is why Bush is so keen to get that $600/per person "Economic Stimulus" into our hands, it's because the economy is doing so well we need to give everyone in America more money to spend. That makes total sense Ragnar.

then forced the industry to relax standards.

I thought you we're against over-regulation of the banking industry. Let the free market decide is the GOP mantra right?

you actually think the mortgage companies willingly cursed themselves with deadbeats ans defaults.

The mortgage industry didn't care, they we're too busy posting record profits for Wall Street. They didn't care as long as Wall Street rewarded them favorably. Like any bubble, people were pointing out the problems long before it happened but no one was paying any attention.

Posted by: Cato on March 7, 2008 04:08 PM
32. Hey Ragnar, here is classic article in the WSJ from 2002 where a noted economist is predicting the Housing Bubble we're currently in.

This is how people treated his ideas:
A Fannie Mae spokeswoman describes the argument as "preposterous," and notes Mr. Greenspan dismissed the chances of a housing bubble in testimony to Congress last week. Robert Van Order, chief international economist for Freddie Mac, says home prices might decelerate in the months ahead, but they're unlikely to crash because interest rates are so low, the inventory of unsold homes is also low and the economy has proven surprisingly resilient.

Hmmmm, which party had control of both houses of Congress, and the Presidency in 2002? Could it be the Republicans? So much for the blame the Democrats theory.

Posted by: Cato on March 7, 2008 04:21 PM
33. And I wonder which party has been in charge in this STATE that short changed our LEOFF 1 STATE Employees retirement fund by 1.75 BILLION DOLLARS?. And these folks want to run healthcare.

Posted by: Smokie on March 8, 2008 06:41 AM
34. Seems like Dino's more serious problem is not who the Dems choose but the fact that the R's have chosen the lefty McCain.
Should Dino ever decide it's a good idea to make a joint apprearence with McCain or otherwise sing his praises he will not get my vote.

Posted by: Guy on March 8, 2008 03:57 PM
35. After 4 years of unchecked liberalism in this state Dino will get my vote and the other three in my families vote. This state cannot take 4 more years of Gregoire's spending spree.

Posted by: GS on March 8, 2008 11:29 PM
36. Guy - cut off your nose to spite your face? Gonna take all your toys and go home because you won't get the perfect candidate? I don't know about you, but I'm not enjoying the prospect of 4 MORE years of total Democrat control.

Posted by: FreedomLover on March 9, 2008 01:21 AM
37. "...voting privileges..."

American citizens do not have voting privileges. We have voting rights.

Also, thanks for admitting how legitimate ballots, cast by legitimate voters, could cause trouble for a candidate who was once shown, in court, to have received the illegal votes of felons. High turnout elections are such a problem in a democracy-- how about having Lori Sotello challenge a whole bunch of legal voters?

Bottom line: anyone in the same party as our miserable failure of a President has a huge risk of going down with him. Worst. President. Ever. might actually have an approval rating in the single digits by October.

Posted by: tensor on March 9, 2008 12:33 PM
38. "...voting privileges..."

American citizens do not have voting privileges. We have voting rights.

Also, thanks for admitting how legitimate ballots, cast by legitimate voters, could cause trouble for a candidate who was once shown, in court, to have received the illegal votes of felons. High turnout elections are such a problem in a democracy-- how about having Lori Sotello challenge a whole bunch of legal voters?

Bottom line: anyone in the same party as our miserable failure of a President has a huge risk of going down with him. Worst. President. Ever. might actually have an approval rating in the single digits by October.

Posted by: tensor on March 9, 2008 12:33 PM
39. I don't know about you, but I'm not enjoying the prospect of 4 MORE years of total Democrat control.

Why not? The local economy is good, housing prices are holding their ground, we have not had any terrorist attacks in the last four years, prices for wheat and apples have gone up, Japan & China are importing our apples, Boeing has it's best selling jetliner to date, they lost that Govt. contract but the GOP Pres. Candidate may have something to do with that. Things are pretty good locally.

Can you tell me what will Dino do differently? Will he somehow get control of the state legislature back? I mean the Dem. Legislature certainly has enough vote to override any legislation he might propose.

Posted by: Cato on March 10, 2008 09:53 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?