February 28, 2008
Chasers

Shamelessly influenced by the "Remainders" feature of Politico bloggers Ben Smith and Jonathan Martin, I'm introducing "Chasers," a periodic offering to provide a round-up of material related to recent Sound Politics posts...with some random additions as well.

Accordingly, here they are...

Following-up to our own discussion of the antics of the New York Times newsroom, the Gray Lady's latest attempt to cast a shadow on its own credibility raises an interesting either/or scenario: either the paper is a) guilty of neglecting to cover a serious issue when the GOP nomination was actually in question or b) guilty of reporting a story that is without serious merit.

The trade debate continues. John McCain reaffirms his own free trade bona fides, while fascinating word leaks out supporting the thesis that Obama's anti-free trade rhetoric isn't likely to hold steady into the fall (or beyond).

Parting shot:

Bob Geldof interviews the "person who has quadrupled aid to the poorest people on the planet."

The Hangover:

George Will sums up the angst of many conservatives who seen McCain's behavior from a reasonably close proximity:

Although his campaign is run by lobbyists; and although his dealings with lobbyists have generated what he, when judging the behavior of others, calls corrupt appearances; and although he has profited from his manipulation of the taxpayer-funding system that is celebrated by reformers -- still, he probably is innocent of insincerity. Such is his towering moral vanity, he seems sincerely to consider it theoretically impossible for him to commit the offenses of appearances that he incessantly ascribes to others.

Over time that tends to irritate people.

Posted by Eric Earling at February 28, 2008 07:15 PM | Email This
Comments
1. The Geldolf article might have been a good piece if he could have put aside his ego.
He didn't, and it came across as crass and slimy as he looks.
What makes him think we would be interested in "Bob", much less the fact that he thinks he's much brighter on foreign policy than the leader of the free world?
How ironic, that he noted Bush was both curious and bright, yet when the President gave Bob an opening to put forth his own curiosity about the reasoning behind Iraq, Geldolf declined, choosing instead to denigrate what he assumes are the President's tactical conclusions.
That's neither curious or bright....but do you expect from an aging roadie.

Posted by: 4WB on February 28, 2008 10:56 PM
2. Wow! Sir Bob Geldof, hero of the lefty masses...until he says something nice about Bush. Now THAT'S ironic!
Don't you just feel the hate there, folks??

Posted by: stewart_street on February 28, 2008 11:45 PM
3. George Will's comments could just as easily be about Theodore Roosevelt. TR was morally vain, attributing but rightousness to himself and his positions, and not just wrongness, but outright sinfulness, to his opponents. He often did this in the face of facts to the contrary, like his campaign against Taft in 1912, a man who broke more trusts and brought more anti-trust suits in three years that TR did in seven and a half. Not that this is a good thing, just that we have had fine presidents who did the same.

Posted by: Paul G on February 29, 2008 03:01 PM
4. viagra online
online viagra

Posted by: emeline_aron on March 2, 2008 03:58 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?