January 30, 2008
Flaying the UW

The biggest water cooler story in local news these days is the Seattle Times' in-depth look at the troubled recent past of the University of Washington football program. The series itself is worth a read, in no small part because of the energy and resources that went into the reporting.

That said, a couple thoughts:

1) The series implies a state of affairs that although recent, should not necessarily be considered current. A new University President, a new Athletic Director, and a new Head Coach are all in place compared to the time period in question. As the Times' itself reports, the result is a change in the culture of the program for the better. Followers of Husky football will further recall that current Coach Ty Willingham came under fire from some corners of the fan base in the discussions after this past football season for not being focused enough on winning, rather than character.

All in all, whether intended or not, the totality of the Times series ends up creating the impression of a program currently run amuck, rather than the more accurate truth of a program that appears to be emerging reasonably well from some serious problems.

2) Speaking of those problems, some of the facts presented in the articles are truly horrifying. On a purely human base it is difficult not to be repelled by the behavior of the bad apples in question as well as the people that enabled them. As someone who has spent some time coaching college athletes and taking seriously the duty to encourage their development outside of sports, I found the stories nauseating. It is a lesson for other athletic programs to avoid assiduously.

3) Despite the validity of the concerns about how the program operated, apparently in the past, there is one nagging issue in my mind. Going back to high school, through college, and then on through professional life, I have consistently found athletic programs of all kinds and the general mood of journalists not covering sports to be antithetical. Reporters as a stereotype tend to have run in very different crowds than most athletes. They're different people with different ideas. And I've rarely found them to be compatible.

Accordingly, even in the midst of obvious attempts to be even-handed, I still detect a whiff of the "nerds v. the jocks" mentality with which just about anyone who has ever gone to high school can identify. As a veteran of both sides of that conflict, I wish it didn't carry over into adult life in such a manner.

Posted by Eric Earling at January 30, 2008 07:17 AM | Email This
Comments
1. 'read the rest link' doesn't apear to work?

Posted by: Duffman on January 30, 2008 07:22 AM
2.
These sorts of issues appear when people don't want to deal with reality.

Reality is: there's a paying market for college athletes.

Fiction is: We'll make all these laws and regulations to pretend their is now.

Ok, so starting from that point, there will always be trouble. My solution is just to tear down the regulations and make star college athletes a kind of "independent study" program where they can get paid as much as their worth and do whatever it takes to be successful. Hire a bunch of tutors (or management consultants)...who cares, as long as they leave with cash in their bank account. Then, when they are 22, if they want to, they can go to class and learn about biology or Dickens or whatever...

Posted by: John Bailo on January 30, 2008 07:42 AM
3. If only they spent as much time investigating state and local government as they do on silly sports investigations from 8 years ago.

Posted by: Palouse on January 30, 2008 07:55 AM
4. #3 Whatever do you mean? Look at what they're focusing on in Olympia?

"House Bill 3284 (Limiting the interest on a small loan to thirty-six percent per annum) Introduced by Rep. Sherry Appleton, (D-Poulsbo) on January 29, 2008, to limit the interest on a small loans available through RCW 31.45 Check cashers and sellers, to thirty-six percent per annum."

Posted by: Duffman on January 30, 2008 08:02 AM
5. I feel bad that I smirk when reading this series about the pain and heartbreak these players were allowed to cause. But I just can't help myself. Would never happen in the Palouse. GO COUGS!

Posted by: ITK on January 30, 2008 08:26 AM
6. No offense but wake up to 'reality' - that's why you'll never win a National Championship...it's rough-going at the top and unfortunately this kind of stuff prevails...'good-guys' winning is in old western movies! :)

Posted by: Duffman on January 30, 2008 08:47 AM
7. It's a GAME........... gezzz get a grip.
I'd be a bit more worried about them understanding the ABC's

Posted by: Army Medic/Vet on January 30, 2008 08:55 AM
8. If you want to see the core difference between Neuheisel and Willingham, it's this: Mike Hunsinger represented 14 players from the 2000 team. He's represented none since Willingham has been the coach.

Posted by: Ed the Head on January 30, 2008 09:02 AM
9. I read the story on Curtis Williams yesterday, and I actually thought that his neck injury and the subsequent death was the best thing that happened to him. I mean no disrespect to Williams and his family, but it was a truly sad story, if you ask me.

Posted by: DopioLover on January 30, 2008 09:02 AM
10. This was a very important story. There are some alums who apparently consider 2000 to be the epitome of success. It wasn't.

Today's story about Anthony Kelley is very inspiring.

I was at the UW Stanford game when Curtis Williams suffered his injury, and the story of the way he played without his mouth guard and would rush in to hit with his face makes me think that the "accident" was bound to happen sooner or later.

Posted by: Stuart Jenner on January 30, 2008 09:33 AM
11. The Times is acting as if this is new news. Anyone paying attention already knew they were thugs and criminals when they were playing.

Posted by: pbj on January 30, 2008 09:34 AM
12. Does it have to be this way? Just look at Penn State under Joe Paterno. He's proved that atheletes can win and be scholars/good citizens. Also, Don James deserves some credit for UW's wayward ways. I remember the mock surprize and dismay that he showed when it was discovered that several Husky boosters were feeding cash to players. I guess he thought it was normal for financialy desitute kids from "The Hood" driving expensive new cars and carrying (then) expensive cell phones. Gimie a break

Posted by: Chuck Berlemann on January 30, 2008 10:20 AM
13. When is Stefan coming back? This site has gotten very stale in his absence.

This story = *yawn* snoozefest *yawn*

Posted by: Cato on January 30, 2008 10:23 AM
14. In the interest of full disclosure, I am a graduate of WAZZU. There are some differences in the way that quality athletic programs are run:

a. WAZZU is undertaking a $70 million remodel of Martin Stadium and we didn't go to the legislature hat in hand. The money is coming from student fees, alumni, and school resources.

b. Can we say ethics or the lack thereof of Rick Neuheisel? Wanna bet UCLA will have the very same problems within a few years.

c. Athletics at all colleges are BIG business and let's get real about it. There has to be a committment from the top to run clean programs. That starts in the prep programs and in school districts like Seattle where their loosey goosey transfer policies have created a "free agent" market at the prep level.

d. There are different types of "racism" and one type is the racism of low expectations usually promoted by the secular progressive philosophy which is whatever ethnic group ________had a hard time and they can only be expected to act this good. Really, Tony Dungy, the head coach of Indianapolis expects better than that. Michael Vick should have had his lame a$$ kicked long before he ended up in federal prision. Some of the Portland Trailblazers should have been kicked to the curb. Oh, and what about the kids with college diplomas that can't even read them? They get injured and never get the pot of gold.

If this is big business, then there has to be some payoff for the players in the form of an education or pension, but this payoff comes only if they adhere to standards, otherwise kick their lame butts to the curb. Word gets around fast if there are rules that MUST be followed.

Oh, you Huskies, on the subject of government money, suck it up like WAZZU did.

Posted by: WVH on January 30, 2008 10:33 AM
15. Reminds me of the Denver Broncos from 20 years ago - if all the players that should have been in jail actually were, the Broncos couldn't have fielded a team.

But, they kept going to the Superbowl and losing, so the local judges made sure that all legal problems were put on hold until after the season, at which point they were made to go away...

Posted by: John Galt on January 30, 2008 11:20 AM
16. If only the Times did this much work on investigating Ron Sims or the crooks down in Olympia....

Seattle will be a better place sans the Times & P-I.

Posted by: AP on January 30, 2008 11:52 AM
17. I feel bad that I smirk when reading this series about the pain and heartbreak these players were allowed to cause. But I just can't help myself. Would never happen in the Palouse. GO COUGS! Posted by ITK at January 30, 2008 08:26 AM

Really? Just scanning today's headlines reveals this:

Ahmu is the second Cougar known to have been arrested this month. Safety Xavier Hicks was arrested for second-degree assault on Jan. 10. In a separate case, Hicks pleaded not guilty Friday in Whitman County Superior Court to second-degree theft for use of a credit card that didn't belong to him, according to The Moscow-Pullman Daily News.

And let's not get started with the credit card fraud ring a group of Coogs had going a few years back. Or the alleged rapist - rhymes with henior jobley. And if you think Ryan Leaf was simply a jerk on the football field, well, you never spent much time around Pullman bars.

My point is, this type of behavior permeates ALL big-time college football programs. No one is exempt.

Posted by: jimg on January 30, 2008 11:57 AM
18. I only read the Sunday one which I found kind of disappointing because 90% of it was about Jerramy Stevens. Yeah, he's always been a jerk, does that mean the entire teams were worse than any other Husky team?

It certainly wasn't just Neuheisel. I really wondered at the time of his investigation and firing why Barbara Hedges wasn't in the docket along with him. UW athletics was rife with bad behavior during her tenure. As it is, I think Slick Rick got kind of a raw deal and was used largely as a scapegoat for a program that had no institutional control.

My guess is Rick'll probably not get himself in trouble at UCLA as he did here, but UCLA is so sick of fielding so-so teams they'll look the other way at a lot of player hooliganism.

Anybody know how USC has been faring in this context? I know of Reggie Bush's possible problems, but I haven't seen a lot of egregious stuff coming out of there (or none that I remember).

Posted by: Frank Black on January 30, 2008 12:20 PM
19. Though I am not a Neuheisel (or Husky) fan, I think it should be noted that these individuals were recruited by Jim Lambright's crew while under pressure to increase the talent pool after mediocre seasons. Neuheisel was just doing what he did at Colorado; bend the rules, use the existing talent to win for a couple of seasons and leave the program a mess.

Posted by: traknut on January 30, 2008 01:10 PM
20. >The series implies a state of affairs that although recent, should not necessarily be considered current.

If one looks only at the UW football program that could very well be true. However the series has done an excellent job of portraying specific events involving the prosecutorial and judicial systems in King County. In that portrayal some very questionable and disturbing events were reported:

The questionable actions of Norm Maleng and his number two man Dan Satterberg in the Prosecutor’s office. Actions tantamount to dictating how the police handle an investigation, timeliness of prosecutive action and declining to prosecute to name a few.

Actions within the judicial system involving questionable acts such as the propriety of sealing records, propriety of sentencing and chumminess with the accused while before the bench to name a few.

Actions by Attorney Mike Hunsinger which possibly indicate a conflict with NCAA rules and regulations to name a few.

This is not just about an atmosphere of “nerds vs. the jocks.” It’s about responsibility and accountability of the major university in the state, responsibility of both King County’s prosecutive and judicial systems, and at least one member of the Sate Bar.

Yes, the individual athletes named are gone and hopefully the new coach will be allowed to carry out his program in the mature manner he has been known for throughout his coaching career.

However as long as Dan Satterberg is King County Prosecutor, judges rule the bench as they have in the reported cases, Mike Hunsinger wants to simply “help” as he claims and the Tyee Club wields so much power and influence then this sordid matter is far, very far, from being something that “should not necessarily be considered current.”

It's time for those elected to maintain the public trust and those sworn to uphold the public trust to use the series in the Times to refocus their priorities and consider this possibley just the first report in what could turn out to be an even darker story or stories of events past, present, and future.

Posted by: Karl on January 30, 2008 03:23 PM
21. eric, could you highlight a few specifics that led you to point 3? while i didn't read every inch of the series, i didn't catch much of a whiff of nerd v jock in what i read. as a reporter/former jock, it struck me as pretty straightahead and about how the paper would cover any institution that had veered into a wrong-headed culture. but maybe i'm wrong.

Posted by: Philip Dawdy on January 30, 2008 04:44 PM
22. RE #17- The difference is that you actually hear about it when Cougar athletes cause trouble. No prosecuters and judges sweeping it all aside and illegally sealing files.

Posted by: ITK on January 30, 2008 06:28 PM
23. I've seen these bumper stickers that say Ted Bundy was a Husky: was he also an athlete?

Posted by: kilroy on January 30, 2008 07:02 PM
24. Bundy wasn't an athlete, but he might have been a tutor.

Posted by: spinmd on January 30, 2008 08:24 PM
25. Not only did Norm Maleng cover up the beatings and rapes of young boys in juvenile detention by Judge Gary Little, he covered up criminal conduct by Husky athletes. Looks like he was the corrupt slime ball I claimed

Posted by: Don on January 31, 2008 09:09 PM
26. I really find it distasteful to talk about people who can't defend themselves. A couple of points:

a. The fact that in Seattle the school transfer policies have created a "free agent" market at the prep level, so kids that think they are going to be the next Lebron James, even though they shoot hoops like me, they are encouraged in that delusion earlier in their life.

b. See, comment #15 by John Gault and his observations of Denver. This is proabaly true of many teams, not all.

c. UCLA has had a few losing seasons, certainly not the glory days of the past and they hire Neuheisel with the brief to just get the job done and one would have to be an idiot to not know what that means.

I think the slimey system of college sports and sports for many major league teams is an engrained cultural affect and at this point is bigger than any one person, dead or alive. If you have an alumni who is really willing and able to write really big checks to bring back the glory days no matter how you get the glory, can you really lay the blame at just individuals or is it a system that has pulled everyone into the muck?

Posted by: WVH on January 31, 2008 10:06 PM
27. One thing that stood out to me was that one of the "those bad, bad student athletes" was a rape suspect never charged. I understand that Washington State statutes now mandate guilt by accusation in the court system, but why should the rest of society abide by this rule?

Posted by: Fergurg on February 4, 2008 02:39 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?