January 08, 2008
Can we still get a Grand Slam at the Ballard Lenny's?

That's Denny's.

The local press and bloggers have glommed onto the story about the Ballard Denny's possibly being nominated on Feb. 6 as a local landmark by Seattle's Landmark Preservation Board; saving the site from transformation to a large mixed use development.

For those who don't know or have recently moved here, drive down to Occupied Ballard and follow Market Street. When you see a cream-colored gawd-awful monstrosity that looks like a rundown IHOP gone to seed then you've found the Ballard Denny's.

Anyone who is a native of Seattle will shake their head at this. The building has always been a joke and a white elephant that was foisted upon poor sleepy Ballard.

Personally I blame the Californians and other out-of-staters for this. They move up here and latch onto the city's seedier side because they think panhandlers and boarded up shacks make a town "gritty" and they can pretend they're tough while navigating the mean streets of the Emerald City...

Supposedly the reason why the Denny's is significant is because of its "googie" inspired design built in 1964 by an architect from San Francisco that no one has ever heard of; Clarence Mayhew. The guy isn't even local. He's a Californian from Berkley. Of note, "googie" is a make believe grab-all term used by people who feel they have artistic taste to describe just about any building built after World War II.

As another example of artistic snobbery one must read a quote in the Seattle PI by Alan Michelson, head of the UW Architecture library who wrote about the Denny's.

"It remains an important artifact of the automobile era in the U.S., and its vibrant, space-age forms crystallized the era's enthusiasm and faith in commerce and technology."

How quaint. Just think, long ago American families would get into "automobiles" in order to drive to places where they desired to exchange their earnings for goods and services. I wonder what it was like when our ancestors parked at morning diners in order to drink coffee and order a $3.99 Grand Slam breakfast with your choice of bacon or sausage links. Those must have been magical times indeed.

First off I have little sympathy for the owner and developers of the site. In order to do an end-around on any future landmark status they actually nominated the building themselves. If the owners' petition was turned down a five-year moratorium would have been placed on any outside party making a later bid.

If anyone thinks betting good money on any governmental entity in the City of Seattle making a rationale decision deserves to have their building taken away and turned into a No Mo Shun Clubhouse and Museum.

The reason why naming the Ballard Denny's is such a lousy idea is that it gives a bad name to historic preservation. What next? Do you start saving car dealerships, strip malls and mini marts? How about mobile home parks? Or Rick's Nightclub?

If you make landmarks out of demonstrably horrible eyesores it makes a laughing stock out of the entire process; a process which should be reserved for structures that have played historically meaningful roles in the community.

Sometimes the lowliest shed or workshop has greater historic value than the most lavishly crafted pleasure palace.

Consider the Pike Place Market. Architecturally it is about as significant as a collection of discarded Chinese take-out boxes. It's a poorly-planned warren of stalls, ramps nooks and blind alleys. Yet it is a vibrant and integral part of the framework of Seattle. Which is why a ballot measure was floated in 1973 to raise taxes to purchase the market and create a PDA to operate the complex.

If you want to start preserving "landmark" buildings and structures in Seattle there are scores of far more worthy candidates. Why not start with the Oddfellows Hall on Capitol Hill. It's the home of the Century Ballroom which attracts hundreds of dancers each week as well as a large artist community.

The building has some great constructive elements which have survived a century of use. There's a unique charm to its creaky floors, steam heaters, poorly hung doors and bare electrical wires. In other words it's a rundown dump.

A developer has purchased the hall and is on the threshold of remodeling the building which will price out the "artists" as well as creating uncertainty about the future of the ballroom. Shouldn't the city "save" the IOOF and keep it a sanctuary for starving actors and professional dancers?

As far as saving monstrously ugly buildings, how about tagging the "Sinking Ship" parking garage in Pioneer Square? Like the Ballard Denny's the structure was also purchased by the Seattle Monorail Project and was slated for demolition to make way for the defunct Green Line.

Farfetched? Not really. Not when you consider the fact that the Sinking Ship is the most significant building in town for the movement of local historical preservation. When the Seattle Hotel, on infamous Skid Row, was torn down in 1961 in the name of urban renewal to make way for the garage it forced the hand of city leaders to create the Pioneer Square Historic District.

All of those quaint brick and masonry buildings still standing on Doc Maynard's old homestead plot are with us because of the Sinking Ship.

So you have the hots for preserving greasy spoons which serve as community watering holes? Screw corporate Denny's. Try Beth's Café off of Aurora Ave. in Green Lake. This is the place to be after a hard night of drinking and partying. Or staying up late studying for classes at UW (read drinking and partying).

Beth's serves the best six and twelve egg omelets in town; the best omelets served at 3:30 a.m. in the morning at any rate. And they've been doing it since 1954.

I'm a third and fourth generation Washingtonian. My great-great-grandfather was a pastor at Seattle's First United Methodist Church (a building richly deserving landmark status). Through the decades Seattle has been cursed by "architects" and "artists" who come here, drop their drawers and leave examples of their creative genius steaming on the city landscape which longtime residents are forced to endure decades later.

Tear down the Ballard Denny's. And while you've got the bulldozers and wrecking balls rented knock down the Experience Music Project, Downtown Seattle Library and toss everything in the Olympic Sculpture Park into Puget Sound to create salmon habitat.

Finally, if you don't like non-descript mixed-used multi-story condos with not enough parking stalls going in everywhere then maybe Seattle residents need to rethink their support of the Growth Management Act... and the politicians they keep in power year after year.

Posted by DonWard at January 08, 2008 04:50 AM | Email This
Comments
1. It shouldn't be saved because it is a Dennys, but because it was a Mannings. Growing up in the NW, I really liked their buffet.

Posted by: rbb on January 8, 2008 05:43 AM
2. I'm from California and I don't think it's a saver. Frankly, not much that was built in the early 60's (I'm sure there are some exceptions) was ever all that attractive.

Posted by: Michele on January 8, 2008 06:42 AM
3. Funny how it was OK to tear down when it was going to be a Monorail station but now that it's going to be condo's it's morphed into an historical site.

Government is run by criminals

Posted by: swassociates on January 8, 2008 06:44 AM
4. Any one advocating saving a 'Denny's' as an historical site borders on being an ignoranus.

Def: ignoranus - A person who's both stupid and an asshole.

Posted by: Transformer on January 8, 2008 06:50 AM
5. If they are going to make it a landmark, they should have to keep landmark prices for a Grand Slam.

If any breakfast joint needs historical landmark status it is the Doghouse and Beth's at GreenLake. For all I know, the Doghouse is gone but they made the best 3 a.m. breakfasts.

Posted by: swatter on January 8, 2008 07:05 AM
6. I have long advocated that the owner of any building that is vacant be given a year to fill it or be given six months to tear or burn it down before it costs the taxpayers big money. I get sick and tired of such nonsense as the Albers Mill, a crumbling derelict building that became another method to suck money from the taxpayers into the pockets of those connected to Tacoma politicians. - "The Albers Mill project included both New Market Tax Credits and Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits, totaling over $10.83 million. It was the first use of New Market Tax Credits on the West Coast."

Posted by: JDH on January 8, 2008 07:24 AM
7. 3AM breakfast... Hmmm Swatter what were you doing up at that time of the morning?
Not drinking and driving I hope. LOL

Posted by: Army Medic/Vet on January 8, 2008 07:41 AM
8. Does anyone remember the Sambo's restaurants? They were lost under the grinder of PC silliness.

Posted by: pbj on January 8, 2008 08:10 AM
9. Medic, it was the 70s.

Yes, pbj, I do remember them. Wenatchee only within the last 10 years (?) lost theirs and is now some pizza joint?

Posted by: swatter on January 8, 2008 08:16 AM
10. "Do you start saving car dealerships, strip malls and mini marts? How about mobile home parks? Or Rick's Nightclub?"

Don, how quickly you forget. Rick's actually did play an historical role in the politics of the Seattle Silly Council ;)

Posted by: TB on January 8, 2008 08:46 AM
11. Ditto the comment regarding that architectural plate of hurl known as the EMP. Just because an architect has achieved worldwide recognition, it doesn't mean all of his designs are works of art. Aside from being an eyesore, that thing has got to be a maintenance nightmare.

Posted by: Peggy U on January 8, 2008 08:47 AM
12. Tear it down. And EMP too. What passes for architecture is pathetic. Too many architects think of themselves as artists. A building's aesthetics and functionality should go together. Another poor example is the new downtown porn viewing center, I mean Main Library. All that cavernous wasted space.

Posted by: Jeff B. on January 8, 2008 09:42 AM
13. rbb, I think of it as that old Mannings building, too. Denny's seems like a late comer. I bet the old time Ballardites think of it as Mannings.
I think Seattle has too much money to throw around.

Posted by: thatcher on January 8, 2008 10:04 AM
14. i live about 1.5 blocks away from this place. yes...it was a great stop for breakfast before i had to take a redeye flight. other than that, no big loss.

historical landmark? puh-lease.

Posted by: mihir on January 8, 2008 10:07 AM
15. Possible future site of Ballard Light Rail station? Only reason I can possibly think that they're saving it.

Posted by: Cato on January 8, 2008 10:14 AM
16. The same naive fools that want to save this "landmark" building are the same agents of stasis that want the earth's temperature to always be like it was in 1970 in spite of what the universe says. They are the new Luddites and proud of it. If these folks were in charge we'd still be walking on mud streets dodging horse dung.

Tear the damn thing down already. The architectural sixties were bas enough without having to be reminded of it every day on the corner if Market and 15th N.W.

There is some scrap of information in the back of my addled brain that suggests that this building might have been a transplant from the '62 Worlds Fair. Anything to that? If so, let it go out in style and burn it down. WOOWHOO!


Posted by: G Jiggy on January 8, 2008 10:56 AM
17. So, the fact that the owners, not the city, initiated the review by their nomination of the building doesn't come into play here?

I read that they did this to prevent a future nomination. Anyone know if a demolition permit would have triggered the review?

Also, designation doesn't always prevent demolition. Sometimes it means good documentation (drawings, photos) before a building is taken down.

Posted by: BA on January 8, 2008 12:22 PM
18. My letter to the editor on the subject here:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2004110815_monlets07.html

Always nice when the Seattle Times prints some common sense. They actually had a decent editorial along the same lines in Sunday's paper.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorialsopinion/2004108071_googieed06.html

Posted by: Mark Griswold on January 8, 2008 02:30 PM
19. I agree absolutely on the library. That is a truly dicked-up piece of architecture.

I am hoping that is the last project the city will give to George Castanza, LLC.

A lady working there didn't agree with me, however, and told me it was a very efficient use of space - I asked if there was any way to get my money back, if I promised to never come back again. I haven't been back to the central branch but have not seen a check yet....

Posted by: Dave Lincoln on January 8, 2008 05:33 PM
20. keep the frame; lose the windows/doors; bring blue tarps; ba-boom---Tent City Rent-To-Own Condos; from eyesore to tolerant caring community resource and all for under $100k;

Posted by: jimmie-howya-doin on January 8, 2008 11:28 PM
21. "It remains an important artifact of the automobile era in the U.S..."

Well, it's easy to see that Mssr. Michelson is a liberal Gore-sucking asshat.

I bet Michelson drives a Beemer. What a dick.

Posted by: NurseWilliam on January 8, 2008 11:54 PM
22. Well, I have to vote to save the Ballard Denny's. Not for any good reason, but for the fact that when I attended SPU in the 1980's and lived in Ballard in the early 1990's the Ballard Denny's was my place to get away. I often ate their alone, contemplating my work or my life's direction. That's not reason alone to save it. But far better to leave it where it is than to replace it with a bunch of over priced nondescript condo's.

Posted by: Patrick McBurney on January 10, 2008 08:47 PM
23. I love the Ballard Denny's. I don't care about the ugly design, or the smoke once you walk in the doors. I don't care about the homeless people in the back, or the crying babies. I care about the friendliness of the place. The familiar smell, look, and feel. I love Denny's because that is the place to be at 3 am on a Saturday when you're a little tipsy, and just high enough to eat 3 big meals. I miss meeting my friends there, sitting down to eat while reading the Stranger and drawing with the broken in half crayons. I definitely vote to save Denny's. We don't need any more condos. We don't need another classic Ballard feature torn down. And we DEFINITELY don't need any more people coming into Ballard; The traffic sucks already.

Posted by: Nathalie on January 13, 2008 04:43 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?