December 11, 2007
Just Remember...

...our modern politics is too divisive to bear, at least according to the conventional wisdom of the punditocracy.

On that note, I give this passage from my current reading selection, a biography of Alexander Hamilton. Speaking of a young Hamilton, just entering public political discourse prior to the Revolution, the book says:

He showed himself proficient at elegant insults, an essential literary talent at the time, and possessing a precocious knowledge of history, philosophy, politics, economics, and law. In retrospect, it was clear that he had found his calling as a fearless, swashbuckling intellectual warrior who excelled in bare-knuckled controversy [emphasis mine].

Heh.

UPDATE: formatting fixed.

Posted by Eric Earling at December 11, 2007 09:19 PM | Email This
Comments
1. Never have been a fan of Hamilton. probably the only founding father I can say I would not have voted for.

Posted by: Travis on December 11, 2007 09:21 PM
2. Did any citizen ever vote for him for anything?

Posted by: Doug on December 11, 2007 09:35 PM
3. Yeah, the key fact is that Hamilton sparred with elegance.

Compare and contrast Hamilton with the profane linguistic tantrums we witness routinely from the local liberal blog of equine prat.

Posted by: Jeff B. on December 11, 2007 09:51 PM
4. I am pretty sure he was a member of the continental congress which I am pretty sure were elected positions.

But I was speaking more in hypotheticals. If I were alive and in a jurisdiction that Hamilton was running for office in, I would have a hard time voting for him.

It could be just bad light in restrospect of history but it seems that whenever I read about him I either openly oppose his position or I lose trust that he was an honorable man with noble intentions. He always comes off very power hungry to me.

Posted by: Travis on December 11, 2007 09:59 PM
5. It appears he was also an assemblyman in the NY state legislature which is an elected position.

Posted by: Travis on December 11, 2007 10:04 PM
6. Thanks Travis, I always thought he was, as you put it, power hungry, as well as just an appointed person that kept feeding his position. A modern day bureaucrat, I guess. That he was ever elected is news to me, seems to me to be someone who could have got himself appointed to the continental congress if he couldn't get elected. Looks like I need to read that book.

Posted by: Doug on December 11, 2007 10:13 PM
7.
Hamilton was an elitist.

And I say....we need more like him.

Posted by: John Bailo on December 11, 2007 11:12 PM
8. Yeah, the Kennedy's, Kerry's and Clintons need to produce more elitists, we just can't get enough of them.

Posted by: Doug on December 11, 2007 11:21 PM
9. @3...Jeff B....

As a frequent HA poster and wingnut insult artisan par excellence, I take slight umbrage with your labelling of everyone there as "profane."

It's the HA Happy Hooligans who are the profane ones; Hooligross verbiage is de rigueur with those whose minds obsese on thoughts scatological and sexual. I, on the other hand, seek to raise the level of discourse over there (ugly job, but somebody has to do it!) by taking them on three, four, five or more at a time all without resorting to the use of four-letter words.

Drives 'em nuts!

Would that more right thinkers joined the fray to smite the heathen hip and thigh...rhetorically speaking, that is.

Of course, you'll be subject to insult and ignominy, but you'll be secure in the knowledge that you're engaged in a noble cause: the spreading of the gospel of truth and eventual conversion of heathen Hooligans.

Once more unto the breach, dear friends!

The Piper

Posted by: Piper Scott on December 12, 2007 05:21 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?