November 26, 2007
No One To Blame

As usual.  This Seattle PI editorial on conditions at the county jail is scathing.

Last week's Justice Department report blasting conditions and treatment of inmates at the King County Correctional Facility is infuriating.

While the DOJ commends the jail's staff for fully cooperating with its investigations, the report's findings are plainly, brutally clear.  It concludes that conditions at the jail "violate the constitutional rights of inmates," and enumerates shortcomings and flaws across the board in the jail's system.  There are problems with inmate intake; inmates are "routinely subjected to" unnecessary use of serious force; the jail fails to protect inmates from harm and to provide them with medical assessment and care.

Scathing, but incomplete.  As you will see if you read the whole editorial, no one is to blame for these conditions, or at least no one the PI wants to name.

Who should be blamed?  The King County Council has a Democratic majority.  More important, the King County executive is Ron Sims, Democrat.  If the PI were willing to name and shame those reponsible for these deplorable conditions, they would have to start with Sims — which may be why they didn't name anyone in that editorial.

Unlike the editors at the Seattle PI, I believe that elected Democrats are (mostly) sane adults, who can be held responsible for their actions, and for the actions of those who work for them.  And I think that improvements at the jail (and elsewhere) are unlikely unless officials are held responsible for failures.  Even if those officials are Democrats.

Cross posted at Jim Miller on Politics.

(The PI doesn't give credit, either.  The DOJ in the first line is, of course, the Department of Justice, which works for George W. Bush, Republican.)

Posted by Jim Miller at November 26, 2007 01:56 PM | Email This
Comments
1. It's Bush's fault!

Posted by: Obi-Wan on November 26, 2007 02:05 PM
2. I say put bars on the rail cars of Sims favorite boondoggle and rename it Link Light Jail.

Load it up full of prisoners and never let them off.

Doing this might even reach the ridership claims made by Sound Transit.

Posted by: Smoley on November 26, 2007 02:26 PM
3. Yep. it's George Bush's fault. Why? Who knows---that's just the standard democrat line. But seriously, if Sims and the council were republican, they'd be naming names here. PI, you've been caught.

Posted by: Michele on November 26, 2007 02:35 PM
4. http://www.mcso.org

Bring on Joe Arpaio

Posted by: JDH on November 26, 2007 02:36 PM
5. Question: where is the obligatory reference to 'water boarding'? That seemed to be missing in the article.

Jail funding is one of the first to get cut. And, are the conditions bad or do the inmates expect cable, workout rooms, etc.

Posted by: swatter on November 26, 2007 02:54 PM
6. Of course the answer (I am sure) will be let's throw more $$$ at the problem and let's build more beds. Why????????? I am not fully aware of the KC problem, but the problem in Pierce County has a lot to do with the Court Calendar (i.e., running of the courts) and moving people timely through the courts. Pierce has enough beds. It may not have the staffing to manage the beds it has, but the biggest factor is the backlog in the court system.

I bet if the state totaled the number of county and state jail beds, it would have more than enough, if they would just operate the system better.

Posted by: tc on November 26, 2007 03:06 PM
7. Bring on Joe Arpaio

Now there's the type of tent city I approve of.

Posted by: RBW on November 26, 2007 03:45 PM
8. So King County's jail is worse than Gitmo? The irony is palpable.

Posted by: Doc-T on November 26, 2007 04:28 PM
9. Inmates denied their Constitutional Rights?

Outrageous.

Wait a minute. What "rights" are we speaking of? Not specified in the P-I article.

Perhaps I could muster some sympathy had not each King County inmate violated some of my own constitutional rights by their criminal acts.

Are no-cost room, board, medical, entertainment and legal defense constitutional rights?

If the crimes and their associated denial of the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizen's are grave enough, the "punishment" is no-cost support for the rest of the criminal's life.

I certainly don't enjoy those rights.

Heck, I just fixed the roof over my head. In the sleet. And earlier, I was trying to earn the money to pay for a King County inmate's delicous hot meal. I'm having a Stouffer's tuna casserole, myself, about four minutes from now.

Yum!

I'm joking to suggest that I deserve any pity.

And so should the P-I be joking that the inmates treatment deserves some kind of guilt, outrage and more funding from those they have assaulted.

Posted by: Bart Cannon on November 26, 2007 06:06 PM
10. Bart @9: They have the right to sing the blues. They have the right to color tv. Frankly I also think Sheriff Joe in Arizona has the right idea. I remember onloading food when I was in the Navy that had stamped on it "Rejected by Dept of Corrections". It wasn't good enough for prisoners but good enought for the military. Let them sleep in tents and eat MREs. Just think of the savings.

Posted by: Mike Miller on November 26, 2007 08:22 PM
11. I agree there is a problem! They should beat the criminals more, not less.

Posted by: pbj on November 27, 2007 04:35 AM
12. Good. Crooks deserve nothing but punishment. I don't care about crooks and their feelings. If they don't like it maybe they should not be criminals.

Posted by: Ray Borbon on November 27, 2007 01:16 PM
13. Being out here in the desert, I am directly familiar with Sheriff Joe Arpaio and I concur with the remarks above, "Bring on Sheriff Joe!"

I have always laughed at the fact that the title of the facility is "Correctional Facility." It isn't correcting anybody, despite the concerns of the liberal left. It is a detention facility and perhaps if it isn't so pleasant, the County wont have to detain the same people over and over again. Ask Sheriff Joe what his return rate is on his prisoners.

Posted by: Desert Rat on November 27, 2007 03:21 PM
14. Bart Cannon: "Perhaps I could muster some sympathy had not each King County inmate violated some of my own constitutional rights by their criminal acts."

Each person in jail violated your rights? That's impressive.

I'm sure everyone that's in jail for possession is curious as to how that applies. Heck there are a number of crimes that someone could be in jail for that have no bearing on other people at all.

Posted by: Leonson on November 29, 2007 02:09 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?